whatmodel.sh / MiniMax-M2
MiniMax-M2
↗ share
+ contribute
MiniMax-M2 is an open-weights language model from MiniMax, released October 2025. Its published size is 230B parameters (10B active per token) and a 205k-token context window. Licence: modified-mit.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of MiniMax-M2, out of 828 with a score, then more from MiniMax.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 169 | 65±1 | api $1.00/M +local | |||
| 170 | 65±2 | api $0.53/M | |||
| 171 | 65±1 | api $0.53/M +local | |||
| 172 | 65±2 | local | |||
| 173 | 65±1 | api $0.20/M +local | |||
| more from MiniMax | |||||
| 84 | 70±1 | api $0.48/M +local | |||
| 120 | 68±1 | api $0.53/M +local | |||
| 150 | 66±1 | api $0.53/M +local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #104 of 300 · 34% of its score · 3 tests
Beats Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), Grok 4.3, o3-pro here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Nova 2 Pro (Preview), Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B) here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| ContractBench success rate (33 observation-contract tool tasks) | 53.5% ✎ | ▆··▆▄▂▄▂▆▆█▄ beats 14/23 | 12% |
| τ²-bench Telecom lab | 87.0% ✎ | ▁·▅█▆▅▂▃▃▂▃▁ beats 64/89 | 12% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 with Terminus 2 agent (benchmark authors' runs) | 30.0% ✎ | ▃··▃·▃▃██▅▃▅ beats 8/14 | 11% |
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #133 of 458 * · 23% of its score · 1 test
Beats Qwen3.5 Plus, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Devstral Small 2 24B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena WebDev (Code Arena) | 1296.6 ✎ | ▁▂▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 20/119 | 23% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #166 of 393 * · 13% of its score · 1 test
Trails LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct, LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking, LFM2.5 8B-A1B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena (text) | 1343.4 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 184/379 | 13% |
other tests2 not in a task · 29% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medmarks-V mean win rate (19 verifiable medical benchmarks, 71 configurations) | 0.5708 ✎ | ▁▄▃▃▇▄█▃▅▁▁▁ beats 26/30 | 20% |
| Medmarks-V weighted mean win rate (61 models, 71 configurations) | 57.1% ✎ | ▂▃▅▂▆▃█▅█▅▃▆ beats 27/34 | 9.5% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · Amazon Bedrock · $0.52/M · $0.3 in / $1.2 out per 1M tokens · 205k context · docs.aws.amazon.com ↗ · price sourceStandard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ.
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run MiniMax-M2 · needs ~138.5 GB · from huggingface.co/unslothchat in the terminal
llama cli -hf unsloth/MiniMax-M2-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf unsloth/MiniMax-M2-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run MiniMax-M2 · needs ~138.5 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/MiniMax-M2-GGUF@UD-Q4_K_XL -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/MiniMaxAI ↗
$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 36%, Medmarks: A Comprehensive Ope… 29%, ContractBench: Can LLM Agents… 12% and 2 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 36% | |
| 2 | 29% | |
| 1 | 12% | |
| 1 | 12% | |
| 1 | 11% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 64.6 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json