whatmodel.sh / Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is an open-weights language model from NVIDIA, released April 2025. Its published size is 253B parameters and a 128k-token context window. Licence: nvidia-open-model.

61.0±1.5#185 of 719 LLMsfrom 10 benchmark results across 5 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, out of 828 with a score, then more from NVIDIA.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
218Grok 4 Fast SpaceXAI (xAI)61±2comparison only2025-09
219GLM-4.5V Z.ai61±2api $0.90/M +local~69GB2025-08
220Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 NVIDIA61±2local~82GB2025-04
221HyperCLOVA X SEED 32B Think NAVER Cloud61±2comparison only2025-12
222Devstral Small 2 24B Mistral61±3local~17GB2025-12
more from NVIDIA
98Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B NVIDIA69±1api $1.35/M +local~89GB2026-06
155Nemotron Cascade 2 30B-A3B NVIDIA66±1local~20GB2026-03
168Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12B NVIDIA65±1api $0.28/M +local~73GB2026-03

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #225 of 300 * · 4.1% of its score · 3 tests

Beats o3-mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Mini, LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BFCL v356.7% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▃▅█▅▄▁▁ beats 64/114medium · avg 52%▇▇ 4.1%blunt · at its level
BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive)10.0% ✎▁▁▁▂▇▆▆▆█▂▄▂ beats 0/111hard · avg 32%—failed run: No function call was ever emitted: 0.00% on every call-producing category and 100% only on Irrelevance Detection, which rewards not calling. The 10% overall is just the irrelevance weight.
BFCL v2 Live lab74.1% ✎█··········█ beats 1/1—not counted yet: no other model in the same run to compare it with
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #77 of 458 * · 1.9% of its score · 2 tests

Beats GPT-5.2, Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), GPT-5.4 mini here, though they rank higher overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LiveCodeBench official release_v5 (Nov 1, 2023–Feb 1, 2025)74.9% ✎█···█····█·█ beats 2/3medium · avg 52%▇ 1.9%at its level · noisy
LiveCodeBench 2024-08 to 2025-02 (version not stated) lab66.3% ✎█··········█ beats 1/1—not counted yet: no other model in the same run to compare it with
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #157 of 393 · 30% of its score · 3 tests

Beats MiniMax-M2, MiniCPM5 2B, Granite 4.2 30B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking, LFM2.5 8B-A1B, LFM2.5 2.6B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1347.6 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 190/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 20%blunt
Arena-Hard (version/judge unspecified) lab87.0% ✎▃▃▂▅▃▆▅█▅▅▂▃ beats 29/30easy · avg 70%▇▇▇ 6.4%small run
IFEval (aggregation unspecified) lab88.9% ✎▁▁▃▁▂▄▄▆█▃▂▁ beats 102/141easy · avg 80%▇▇ 3.9%small run
math█··········█ #2 of 2 · 34% of its score · 3 tests

Trails Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
AIME 2025 lab72.5% ✎▁·▁▁▁▂▅▆█▇▅▁ beats 70/133medium · avg 39%▇▇▇▇▇ 14%sharp · at its level · small run
AIME 2024 lab80.8% ✎▁▁▁▂▁▃▁▅███▃ beats 55/85medium · avg 48%▇▇▇▇▇ 12%sharp · small run
MATH-500 lab97.0% ✎▁▃▂▃▅▇▅▇█▅▂▁ beats 68/84very easy · avg 90%▇▇▇ 8.1%maxed out · small run
other tests2 not in a task · 29% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA Diamond lab76.0% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅███▄ beats 176/310hard · avg 47%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 16%sharp · at its level · small run
EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligence, judge Elo)1139.8 ✎▁·▂▁▄▅▅▃█▄▁▁ beats 17/62avg 1044▇▇▇▇▇ 12%typical

$ where to run it

llama.cpp · recommended

version

  1. Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.
    macOS / Linux
    curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
    Windows
    irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex

    other ways to install ↗

  2. Run Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 · needs ~152.3 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth
    chat in the terminal
    llama cli -hf unsloth/Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL
  3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
    llama serve -hf unsloth/Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL

LM Studio

version

  1. Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.

    download it (macOS / Windows / Linux) ↗

  2. Run Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 · needs ~152.3 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth

    open in LM Studio ↗

  3. Or download it in the terminal
    lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1-GGUF@UD-Q4_K_XL -y
  4. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name

MLX (Mac)

  1. Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.
    with uv
    uv tool install mlx-lm
    or
    pip install mlx-lm
  2. Run Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 · needs ~174.2 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/LibraxisAI
    chat in the terminal
    mlx_lm.chat --model LibraxisAI/Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1-MLX-Q5
  3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
    mlx_lm.server --model LibraxisAI/Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1-MLX-Q5

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/nvidia ↗

$ how the score was worked out · NVIDIA — Llama-Nemotron: Effi… 61%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 20%, EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderbo… 12% and 2 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
NVIDIA — Llama-Nemotron: Efficient Reasoning Models · lab-reported6▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 61%CC BY 4.0
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇▇▇▇ 20%CC BY 4.0
EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results1▇▇▇▇ 12%MIT
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive1▇ 4%Apache-2.0
LiveCodeBench official website results (2025-08-01)1▇ 2%CC-BY-SA-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 61.0

not counted (3)

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archiveBFCL V4 (December 2025 archive) [correct]10.0%failed run: No function call was ever emitted: 0.00% on every call-producing category and 100% only on Irrelevance Detection, which rewards not calling. The 10% overall is just the irrelevance weight.
NVIDIA — Llama-Nemotron: Efficient Reasoning ModelsBFCL v2 Live [correct]74.1%fewer than three models have this test yet, or this source ran it for this model alone
NVIDIA — Llama-Nemotron: Efficient Reasoning ModelsLiveCodeBench 2024-08 to 2025-02 (version not stated) [correct]66.3%fewer than three models have this test yet, or this source ran it for this model alone

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json