whatmodel.sh / Seed-OSS 36B Instruct

Seed-OSS 36B Instruct is an open-weights language model from ByteDance Seed, released August 2025. Its published size is 36.2B parameters and a 524k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.

62.6±1.0#169 of 719 LLMsfrom 21 benchmark results across 2 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Seed-OSS 36B Instruct, out of 828 with a score.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
195GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai63±1api $0.42/M +local~35GB2025-07
196Qwen3.5 9B Alibaba63±1api $0.11/M +local~7.4GB2026-03
197Seed-OSS 36B Instruct ByteDance Seed63±1local~23GB2025-08
198GPT-4.5 Preview OpenAI63±1comparison only2025-02
199Trinity-Large-Thinking Arcee AI63±2api $0.39/M +local~141GB2026-04

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #136 of 300 · 15% of its score · 4 tests

Beats DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, o4-mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Large, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
SWE-bench Verified lab56.0% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁▁ beats 44/131hard · avg 17%▇▇ 5.0%sharp · at its level · small run
τ-bench Retail lab70.4% ✎▁····▃·▂▇█▃▆ beats 21/28hard · avg 34%▇▇ 4.2%at its level · small run
τ-bench Airline lab46.0% ✎▁▁▁·▅▄▁█▇▁▁▇ beats 16/28hard · avg 25%▇▇ 3.9%at its level · small run
Multi-SWE-bench (scaffold per note) lab17.0% ✎█··█·······█ beats 2/2very hard · avg 5.7%▇ 2.3%small run
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #122 of 458 · 12% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Qwen3.5 Plus, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Kimi K2 Thinking here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
SWE-bench Verified lab56.0% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁▁ beats 44/131hard · avg 17%▇▇ 5.0%sharp · at its level · small run
LiveCodeBench v6 (Feb–May 2025) lab67.4% ✎▁▁▃▁█▅▄▇▅▅▃█ beats 18/38medium · avg 41%▇▇ 4.3%at its level
Multi-SWE-bench (scaffold per note) lab17.0% ✎█··█·······█ beats 2/2very hard · avg 5.7%▇ 2.3%small run
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #191 of 393 * · 1.6% of its score · 1 test

Trails LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct, LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking, Gemma 3 12B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
IFEval (aggregation unspecified) lab85.8% ✎▁▁▃▁▂▄▄▆█▃▂▁ beats 80/141easy · avg 80%▇ 1.6%typical
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #140 of 398 · 20% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Claude Sonnet 4.6, MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B), MiniMax-M2.7 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Olmo 3 32B Think, Olmo 3.1 32B Think, gpt-oss-20b here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
OTIS mock AIME 2024–202567.5% ✎▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 97/193very hard · avg 8.5%▇▇▇▇ 8.9%sharp · at its level · noisy
AIME 2024 lab91.7% ✎▁▁▁▂▁▃▁▅███▃ beats 78/85easy · avg 68%▇▇ 6.0%sharp
AIME 2025 lab84.7% ✎▁·▁▁▁▂▅▆█▇▅▁ beats 98/133medium · avg 56%▇▇ 5.4%sharp
other tests11 not in a task · 58% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA Diamond +171.5% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 108/208hard · avg 40%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 26%sharp · at its level · several runs
MMLU lab87.4% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▅█▃▆▃ beats 170/183medium · avg 72%▇▇ 5.3%typical
Humanity's Last Exam lab10.1% ✎▁▁▁▃▆▆▇██▆▁▃ beats 16/104very hard · avg 4.2%▇▇ 5.2%typical
MMLU-Pro lab82.7% ✎▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂▄▅█▁ beats 151/188medium · avg 63%▇▇ 4.6%typical
MMMLU lab78.4% ✎▂▁▁▂▃▂▄▄▅██▃ beats 26/46medium · avg 64%▇▇ 4.0%typical
SuperGPQA lab55.7% ✎▂▁▂▂▅▆▃▇▇▇█▃ beats 27/46medium · avg 37%▇ 3.3%at its level
SimpleQA lab9.7% ✎▄▄▄▆█▆███·▂█ beats 10/32very hard · avg 6.4%▇ 2.9%typical
KOR-Bench lab70.6% ✎▄·······█··▄ beats 2/3medium · avg 55%▇ 2.5%at its level
3 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)13.0% ✎█▁▁▁▁▃▁▄▂▂▁▁ beats 64/135very hard · avg 5.9%▇ 2.0%sharp · too hard for it · noisy
RULER 128k lab94.6% ✎▃··▅▄▇▅█▇·▃▃ beats 32/32easy · avg 72%▇ 1.7%typical
BeyondAIME lab65.0% ✎▄·▂·▂▄··▄▄▄█ beats 10/15medium · avg 36%▇ 1.0%at its level

$ where to run it

llama.cpp · recommended

version

  1. Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.
    macOS / Linux
    curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
    Windows
    irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex

    other ways to install ↗

  2. Run Seed-OSS 36B Instruct · needs ~22.22 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth
    chat in the terminal
    llama cli -hf unsloth/Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M
  3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
    llama serve -hf unsloth/Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M

LM Studio

version

  1. Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.

    download it (macOS / Windows / Linux) ↗

  2. Run Seed-OSS 36B Instruct · needs ~22.22 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth

    open in LM Studio ↗

  3. Or download it in the terminal
    lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y
  4. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name

Ollama

version

  1. Install Ollama

    download it (macOS / Windows) ↗

    Linux
    curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
  2. Run Seed-OSS 36B Instruct · needs ~22.22 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth
    chat in the terminal
    ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M

MLX (Mac)

version

  1. Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.
    with uv
    uv tool install mlx-lm
    or
    pip install mlx-lm
  2. Run Seed-OSS 36B Instruct · needs ~20.3 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-community
    chat in the terminal
    mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-MLX-4bit
  3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
    mlx_lm.server --model lmstudio-community/Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-MLX-4bit

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/ByteDance-Seed ↗

$ how the score was worked out · ByteDance-Seed/Seed-OSS-36B-I… 73%, Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 27%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
ByteDance-Seed/Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct model card · lab-reported18▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 73%apache-2.0
Epoch AI — internal evaluations3▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 27%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 0%
weighted average= 62.6

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json