whatmodel.sh / Qwen3.5 Flash

Qwen3.5 Flash is a closed-weights language model from Alibaba, released February 2026. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison model from the Epoch AI internal-evaluation CSVs (Epoch release date 2026-02-25). API model qwen3.5-flash; Epoch model_metadata: 'Qwen 3.5 Flash (hosted 35B-A3B)'. Kept distinct from open-weights qwen3-5-35b-a3b (hosted product, qwen3-6-flash precedent). Default (thinking) runs used; '_none' runs not mixed in.

64.8±1.1#144 of 719 LLMsfrom 9 benchmark results across 3 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Qwen3.5 Flash, out of 828 with a score, then more from Alibaba.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
163DeepSeek R1 0528 DeepSeek65±1api $0.91/M +local~110GB2025-05
164EXAONE 4.5 33B LG AI Research65±2local~24GB2026-04
165Qwen3.5 Flash Alibaba65±1api $0.17/M2026-02
166ChatGPT-4o (2025-03-26) OpenAI65±2comparison only2025-03
167INTELLECT-3 Prime Intellect65±1local~48GB2025-11
more from Alibaba
18Qwen3.8 Max (2.4T-A95B) Alibaba78±1api $3.00/M +local~380GB2026-08
34Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Alibaba76±1api $3.00/M2026-09
37Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Alibaba75±1local~59GB2026-08

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #163 of 458 * · 19% of its score · 1 test

Beats Gemini 2.5 Pro, Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, Ministral 3 8B Reasoning 2512, Phi-4-reasoning 14B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)1243.1 ✎▁▂▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 11/119avg 981▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 19%sharp
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #113 of 393 * · 11% of its score · 1 test

Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B), GPT-5 mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Nemotron-Cascade-8B, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Mistral Large 3 (675B-A41B) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1395.9 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 241/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇ 11%blunt
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #156 of 398 * · 42% of its score · 2 tests

Beats MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B), MiniMax-M2.7, MiniMax-M2.1 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen3-VL 4B Thinking, Granite 4.2 3B, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
FrontierMath tiers 1–3 v29.5% ✎▂··▁▃▃▄▄█▅▃▃ beats 6/82very hard · avg 1.2%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 32%sharp
OTIS mock AIME 2024–202584.4% ✎▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 123/193very hard · avg 8.5%▇▇▇▇ 10%sharp · at its level · noisy
other tests5 not in a task · 28% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA Diamond82.3% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 132/208hard · avg 40%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 18%sharp · at its level
SimpleQA Verified20.3% ✎▁▁▃▂▃▃▆▆█▃▂▅ beats 13/78very hard · avg 8.0%▇ 3.3%at its level
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)21.0% ✎█▁▁▁▁▂▁▄▂▂▁▁ beats 83/135very hard · avg 5.9%▇ 3.2%sharp · too hard for it · noisy
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)20.0% ✎█··▂▃▇▄█▂▃▁▁ beats 33/74very hard · avg 9.4%▇ 2.9%sharp · too hard for it · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate)89.5% ✎▁▂▁▂▅█▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 41/98very easy · avg 90%▇ 0.0%blunt

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · $0.18/M · $0.1 in / $0.4 out per 1M tokens · 1M context · www.alibabacloud.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per 1M tokens, Singapore (International), qwen3.5-flash (currently equivalent to qwen3.5-flash-2026-02-23), 0<Token<=1M single tier: input $0.1, output $0.4. Batch and context-cache discounts, higher tiers and free quota excluded. Observed 2026-09-28.

$ how the score was worked out · Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 69%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 30%, Vectara hallucination leaderb… 0%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Epoch AI — internal evaluations6▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 69%CC BY 4.0
LMArena leaderboard dataset2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 30%CC BY 4.0
Vectara hallucination leaderboard (vectara/hallucination-leaderboard repository)1▇ 0%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 64.8

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json