whatmodel.sh / Command A+ (05-2026)

Command A+ (05-2026) is an open-weights language model from Cohere, released May 2026. Its published size is 218B parameters (25B active per token) and a 128k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.

64.3±1.0#153 of 719 LLMsfrom 23 benchmark results across 3 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Command A+ (05-2026), out of 828 with a score, then more from Cohere.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
173Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 Alibaba65±1api $0.20/M +local~76GB2025-07
174Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B) Mistral65±1api $3.00/M +local~42GB2026-04
175Command A+ (05-2026) Cohere64±1api price unknown +local~71GB2026-05
176Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic64±1api $2.00/M2025-10
177Nemotron-Labs-3 Puzzle 75B-A9B NVIDIA64±1local~35GB2026-06
more from Cohere
76North Small Translate 1.0 Cohere71±6api price unknown2026-08
277Command A (03-2025) Cohere57±1api $4.38/M +local~37GB2025-03
324Command A Reasoning (08-2025) Cohere55±2local~34GB

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #138 of 300 · 25% of its score · 6 tests

Beats DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, o4-mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Large, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Terminal-Bench Hard +125.0% ✎▄········██▄ beats 1/5very hard · avg 4.2%▇▇▇ 8.6%sharp · small run · several runs
τ²-bench Telecom lab85.0% ✎▁·▅█▆▅▂▃▃▂▃▁ beats 63/89hard · avg 25%▇▇ 5.9%sharp · at its level · small run
APEX-Agents (pass@1)1.6% ✎▄▄····▄···█▄ beats 0/5very hard · avg 1.8%▇▇ 3.9%too hard for it
MCP-Atlas (public set)27.2% ✎▄▄▄·······█▄ beats 0/5hard · avg 19%▇ 3.4%at its level
SWE-bench Verified14.4% ✎▄··········█ beats 0/5hard · avg 16%▇ 2.5%sharp · at its level · noisy
τ³-bench Banking5.8% ✎█·▄▄······▄▄ beats 1/5very hard · avg 5.1%▇ 1.0%blunt
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #152 of 458 · 9.2% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B-A3B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Ministral 3 8B Reasoning 2512, Phi-4-reasoning 14B, DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LiveCodeBench v6 (window unspecified)86.1% ✎▄······▄▄▄·█ beats 2/5medium · avg 50%▇▇ 4.3%typical
SWE-bench Verified14.4% ✎▄··········█ beats 0/5hard · avg 16%▇ 2.5%sharp · at its level · noisy
SciCode (level unspecified) lab38.0% ✎▁····▃▄▄▄█▆▂ beats 21/34hard · avg 19%▇ 2.4%at its level · small run
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #104 of 398 · 17% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Claude Sonnet 4.6, MiniMax-M3, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemini 2.5 Flash, gpt-oss-120b, GLM-4.5-Air here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
AIME 202696.0% ✎▄▄··▄····█·▄ beats 4/5medium · avg 64%▇▇▇ 8.7%sharp
AIME 2025 lab90.0% ✎▁·▁▁▁▂▅▆█▇▅▁ beats 116/133medium · avg 47%▇▇ 4.5%sharp · small run
HMMT February 202673.5% ✎█▄▄········█ beats 3/5hard · avg 31%▇▇ 3.8%sharp · at its level · noisy
vision & documents······█····· #1 of 1 * · 5.8% of its score · 2 tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
CharXiv (reasoning questions) lab52.7% ✎▂▅▃▅▅▆▆▅▆█▆▂ beats 32/100hard · avg 34%▇ 2.9%at its level · small run
CharXiv descriptive questions lab88.0% ✎▂▄▄▅▇▄█▇▇▂▁▂ beats 42/58easy · avg 71%▇ 2.9%small run
other tests9 not in a task · 45% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA Diamond75.6% ✎█···██·█··██ beats 1/5hard · avg 42%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 20%sharp · at its level
MMLU-Pro79.0% ✎▄·▄▄····▄··█ beats 0/5medium · avg 55%▇▇▇ 6.5%typical
Humanity's Last Exam11.4% ✎█▄······▄·▄▄ beats 0/5very hard · avg 4.7%▇▇ 6.1%typical
IFBench (aggregation unspecified)73.9% ✎▄···▄▄··▄··█ beats 3/5medium · avg 43%▇▇ 4.2%at its level
MultiChallenge45.8% ✎█··▄·▄·····█ beats 2/5hard · avg 25%▇ 3.3%at its level
WMT25 Terminology Translation (term success rate) lab68.7% ✎▂·▃··▂·▄▂·█▆ beats 1/12medium · avg 64%▇ 1.7%noisy
IFBench prompt-level (loose) lab74.0% ✎▃········██▅ beats 2/8medium · avg 41%▇ 1.5%at its level · small run
WMT24++ lab81.0% ✎█·▃·▅▅▃···▃▃ beats 10/10easy · avg 71%▇ 0.8%blunt
1 more test
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
WMT26 General MT (GEMBA-ESA, LLM judge) lab76.5% ✎▄·▄▄▄·▄██▄█▄ beats 6/12easy · avg 65%▇ 0.6%blunt · at its level

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · price unknown · 128k context · docs.cohere.com ↗

llama.cpp · recommended

version

  1. Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.
    macOS / Linux
    curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
    Windows
    irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex

    other ways to install ↗

  2. Run Command A+ (05-2026) · needs ~131.3 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowski
    chat in the terminal
    llama cli -hf bartowski/command-a-plus-05-2026-GGUF:Q4_K_M
  3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
    llama serve -hf bartowski/command-a-plus-05-2026-GGUF:Q4_K_M

LM Studio

version

  1. Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.

    download it (macOS / Windows / Linux) ↗

  2. Run Command A+ (05-2026) · needs ~131.3 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowski

    open in LM Studio ↗

  3. Or download it in the terminal
    lms get https://huggingface.co/bartowski/command-a-plus-05-2026-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y
  4. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/CohereLabs ↗

$ how the score was worked out · Solar Open 2 Technical Report… 72%, Cohere vendor-reported benchm… 25%, Cohere — North Small Translat… 3%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Solar Open 2 Technical Report (Upstage, arXiv:2607.20062v2)13▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 72%CC-BY-4.0
Cohere vendor-reported benchmark scores for its own models (cohere.com blog) · lab-reported7▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 25%Factual vendor-reported score (not licensed content)
Cohere — North Small Translate (arXiv:2609.13916v1) · lab-reported3▇ 3%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 0%
weighted average= 64.3

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json