whatmodel.sh / Mistral Medium 3.1 (2508)

Mistral Medium 3.1 (2508) is a closed-weights language model from Mistral, released August 2025.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'mistral-medium-2508' (text, vision). Released 2025-08: Mistral model card: 'released August 2025'. Mistral card status 'Deprecated' (deprecation date 5/22/2026). Mistral Medium 3 (2505), deprecated the same day, is recorded in the catalogue as retired 8/31/2026, so no current API is asserted.

64.0±2.4comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 4 benchmark results across 3 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Mistral Medium 3.1 (2508), out of 828 with a score, then more from Mistral.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
178Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking Alibaba64±1local~111GB2025-09
179Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Alibaba64±1api $0.67/M +local~78GB2025-07
180Mistral Medium 3.1 (2508) Mistral64±2comparison only2025-08
181Gemma 4 26B-A4B Google64±1api $0.14/M +local~18GB2026-04
182Kimi K2 Instruct (0905) Moonshot AI64±2local~298GB2025-09
more from Mistral
79Mistral Large 4 (public preview) Mistral71±2api $2.06/M2026-10
174Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B) Mistral65±1api $3.00/M +local~42GB2026-04
200Magistral Medium 1.2 (2509) Mistral63±2comparison only2025-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▂▆█▆▅▄▄▃▂▁ #113 of 340 * · 11% of its score · 1 test

Beats Grok 4.3, o3-pro, Qwen3.6 Plus here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Nova 2 Pro (Preview) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 (action completion)61.0% ✎▅▃·▃▃▅▅█▃█▅▅ beats 18/19hard · avg 27%▇▇▇▇ 11%at its level
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #116 of 463 * · 50% of its score · 1 test

Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), Inkling Small (266B-A12B), GPT-5.4 nano here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Mistral Large 3 (675B-A41B), GPT-4.1, Gemma 4 12B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1407.9 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 252/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 50%blunt
vision & documents▁▁▃▃▂▃▅▄▇▇█▃ #112 of 182 * · 35% of its score · 1 test

Beats DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails GPT-4o (2024-11-20), Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena vision (style controlled)1159.4 ✎▁▁▂▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 53/145avg 1068▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 35%blunt
other tests1 not in a task · 1.7% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard, 2025 dataset (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate)88.6% ✎▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 18/140very easy · avg 94%▇ 1.7%blunt · maxed out · noisy

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 85%, Galileo Agent Leaderboard (v1… 11%, Vectara hallucination leaderb… 2%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 85%CC BY 4.0
Galileo Agent Leaderboard (v1 and v2 results)1▇▇▇ 11%Apache-2.0
Vectara hallucination leaderboard (vectara/hallucination-leaderboard repository)1▇ 2%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 3%
weighted average= 64.0

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json