whatmodel.sh / LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking
LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking
↗ share
+ contribute
LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking is an open-weights language model from Liquid AI, released January 2026. Its published size is 1.17B parameters and a 33k-token context window. Licence: lfm1.0.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking, out of 828 with a score, then more from Liquid AI.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 431 | 49±1 | local | |||
| 432 | 49±1 | local | |||
| 433 | 49±2 | local | |||
| 434 | 49±1 | local | |||
| 435 | 49±1 | local | |||
| more from Liquid AI | |||||
| 370 | 53±1 | local | |||
| 375 | 52±1 | local | |||
| 398 | 51±1 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #216 of 300 * · 3.1% of its score · 1 test
Beats o1 (2024-12-17), o3-mini, DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Mini here, though they rank lower overall.
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #140 of 393 * · 8.0% of its score · 1 test
Beats INTELLECT-3, Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12B, MiniMax-M2 here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval mean of four measures lab | 88.4% ✎ | █·█··█·██·██ beats 6/6 | 8.0% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #210 of 398 · 38% of its score · 3 tests
Beats DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24), GPT-4o (2024-08-06), Command A (03-2025) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Olmo 3 7B Instruct, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B, Phi-4-mini-reasoning 3.8B here, though they rank lower overall.
other tests5 not in a task · 49% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond lab | 37.9% ✎ | █··········█ beats 4/5 | 18% |
| MMLU-Pro lab | 49.6% ✎ | █···█·██·███ beats 5/6 | 13% |
| IFBench (aggregation unspecified) lab | 44.9% ✎ | ▄·█·█······█ beats 5/6 | 11% |
| EuroEval HellaSwag (English), test split, 5-shot generative MC, accuracy | 38.9% ✎ | ▃·▁▁▂▃▂▅█▇▄▁ beats 20/100 | 4.9% |
| EuroEval Life in the UK (English knowledge MC), test split, 5-shot, accuracy | 75.2% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▄▃ beats 50/146 | 3.3% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking · needs ~0.7 GB · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)chat in the terminal
llama cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking · needs ~0.7 GB · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking · needs ~1.2 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run lfm2.5-thinking:1.2b
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking · needs ~0.7 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)chat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking-MLX-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking-MLX-4bit
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/LiquidAI ↗
$ how the score was worked out · LiquidAI/LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking… 90%, EuroEval leaderboards (result… 8%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 90% | |
| 2 | 8% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 48.9 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json