whatmodel.sh / MiniMax-M1 (80k)
MiniMax-M1 (80k)
↗ share
+ contribute
MiniMax-M1 (80k) is an open-weights language model from MiniMax, released June 2025. Its published size is 456B parameters (45.9B active per token) and a 1M-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of MiniMax-M1 (80k), out of 828 with a score, then more from MiniMax.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 199 | 63±2 | api $0.39/M +local | |||
| 200 | 63±2 | comparison only | |||
| 201 | 62±1 | api $0.96/M +local | |||
| 202 | 62±1 | local | |||
| 203 | 62±1 | api $3.50/M | |||
| more from MiniMax | |||||
| 84 | 70±1 | api $0.48/M +local | |||
| 120 | 68±1 | api $0.53/M +local | |||
| 150 | 66±1 | api $0.53/M +local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks······█····· #1 of 1 * · 8.7% of its score · 3 tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified lab | 56.0% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁▁ beats 45/131 | 8.7% |
| τ-bench Airline (GPT-4.1 user) lab | 62.0% ✎ | █··········█ beats 1/1 | — |
| τ-bench Retail (GPT-4.1 user) lab | 63.5% ✎ | █··········█ beats 0/1 | — |
coding······█····· #1 of 1 * · 13% of its score · 2 tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified lab | 56.0% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁▁ beats 45/131 | 8.7% |
| LiveCodeBench 2024-08–2025-05 (version unstated) lab | 65.0% ✎ | ▃···█··▅··▃▃ beats 3/7 | 4.3% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #143 of 393 * · 14% of its score · 1 test
Beats INTELLECT-3, Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12B, MiniMax-M2 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 1.2B Thinking, LFM2.5 8B-A1B, LFM2.5 2.6B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena (text) | 1363.9 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 207/379 | 14% |
math······█····· #1 of 1 · 26% of its score · 3 tests
other tests7 not in a task · 46% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond lab | 70.0% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅███▄ beats 153/310 | 12% |
| LongBench v2 lab | 61.5% ✎ | ▂·▁·▂▂▁▃▄▁█▄ beats 24/28 | 6.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam lab | 8.4% ✎ | ▁▁▁▃▆▆▇██▆▁▃ beats 11/104 | 6.5% |
| SimpleQA lab | 18.5% ✎ | ▄▄▄▆█▆███·▂█ beats 19/32 | 5.8% |
| MMLU-Pro lab | 81.1% ✎ | ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂▄▅█▁ beats 131/188 | 5.7% |
| ZebraLogic lab | 86.8% ✎ | █·▁▁▁▇·▄▄▁▄▁ beats 14/24 | 5.6% |
| MultiChallenge lab | 44.7% ✎ | ▁·▁·▁▃▆▅▃▁█▅ beats 9/29 | 3.8% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · Novita AI · $0.96/M · $0.55 in / $2.2 out per 1M tokens · 1M context · novita.ai ↗ · price sourceUSD per 1M text tokens, standard uncached input and output. Model endpoint minimaxai/minimax-m1-80k. Product: Serverless chat completions. API model: minimaxai/minimax-m1-80k. Settings: service tier=standard, batch=no, cache=uncached input. Additional/excluded charges: Tools, cache storage, priority service and other modalities excluded.. Currency: USD.
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~912.21 GB · from huggingface.co/MiniMaxAI (official)
pip install transformers torch accelerate && python -c "from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, GenerationConfig; p='MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M1-80k'; m=AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(p, device_map='auto', trust_remote_code=True); t=AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(p, trust_remote_code=True); x=t(t.apply_chat_template([{'role': 'user', 'content': [{'type': 'text', 'text': 'Do you have mayonnaise recipes?'}]}], tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True), return_tensors='pt').to(m.device); o=m.generate(**x, generation_config=GenerationConfig(max_new_tokens=20, eos_token_id=t.eos_token_id, use_cache=True)); print(t.batch_decode([o[0][x.input_ids.shape[1]:]], skip_special_tokens=True)[0])"
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/MiniMaxAI ↗
$ how the score was worked out · MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M1-80k mode… 85%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 14%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 85% | |
| 1 | 14% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 62.4 |
not counted (2)
| MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M1-80k model card | τ-bench Airline (GPT-4.1 user) [correct] | 62.0% | fewer than three models have this test yet, or this source ran it for this model alone |
| MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M1-80k model card | τ-bench Retail (GPT-4.1 user) [correct] | 63.5% | fewer than three models have this test yet, or this source ran it for this model alone |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json