whatmodel.sh / LFM2.5 2.6B
LFM2.5 2.6B
↗ share
+ contribute
LFM2.5 2.6B is an open-weights language model from Liquid AI, released July 2026. Its published size is 2.7B parameters and a 131k-token context window. Licence: lfm1.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Liquid AI's LFM2.5-2.6B (LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B @654f946, created 2026-07-28, LFM Open License v1.0), post-trained for agentic workloads. Scored through OpenBMB's internally reproduced 'LFM2.5-2.6B' column in the MiniCPM5-2B card (independent). Its own card's comparison table is held for the owner (no statement that Liquid ran the comparators).
Model information sources
Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗
HF safetensors metadata 2,697,198,592 parameters (card names it 2.6B).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of LFM2.5 2.6B, out of 828 with a score, then more from Liquid AI.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 368 | 53±1 | local | |||
| 369 | 53±0 | comparison only | |||
| 370 | 53±1 | local | |||
| 371 | 53±3 | local | |||
| 372 | 52±1 | api $0.72/M +local | |||
| more from Liquid AI | |||||
| 375 | 52±1 | local | |||
| 398 | 51±1 | local | |||
| 433 | 49±2 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #163 of 300 · 16% of its score · 6 tests
Beats o1 (2024-12-17), o3-mini, DeepSeek R1 0528 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Mini, Jamba 1.5 Large here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive) +1 | 61.1% ✎ | ▄·█·▄▄▄▄·▄·▄ beats 7/8 | 5.6% |
| BrowseComp-ZH | 9.8% ✎ | ▄▄·▄▄▄·█···█ beats 3/8 | 2.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 6.0% ✎ | ▄··▄▄█··▄·▄█ beats 4/8 | 2.5% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 90.4% ✎ | ▁·▅█▆▅▂▃▃▂▃▁ beats 68/89 | 1.9% |
| SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified) | 0.6% ✎ | █▂···▂···▄·▂ beats 3/8 | 1.7% |
| τ³-bench Banking lab | 5.7% ✎ | ▂▂·▅█▂▂▃▂▅▂▃ beats 7/20 | 1.6% |
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #351 of 458 · 22% of its score · 5 tests
Trails Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct (Apr 2024), Code Tulu 2 13B, DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench v6 (window unspecified) +1 | 42.1% ✎ | ▃····█·▃▅▃·▃ beats 2/8 | 10% |
| LiveCodeBench Pro 2025Q2 (Easy) | 30.9% ✎ | ▄···█▄··▄█▄▄ beats 3/8 | 5.0% |
| LiveCodeBench Pro 2025Q2 (Medium) | 0.0% ✎ | █···▂··▄▂··▂ beats 3/8 | 3.0% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 6.0% ✎ | ▄··▄▄█··▄·▄█ beats 4/8 | 2.5% |
| SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified) | 0.6% ✎ | █▂···▂···▄·▂ beats 3/8 | 1.7% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #114 of 393 * · 0.3% of its score · 1 test
Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B), GPT-5 mini here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval (aggregation unspecified) | 93.4% ✎ | ▄▄····▄··███ beats 7/8 | 0.3% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #233 of 398 · 39% of its score · 4 tests
Beats GPT-4o (2024-08-06), Command A (03-2025), GPT-4o (2024-11-20) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails OpenThinker 7B, Olmo 3 7B Instruct, Tulu 2 70B here, though they rank lower overall.
web search█·█▄██·▄▄·▄▄ #10 of 13 * · 2.6% of its score · 1 test
Beats Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, Gemma 4 E4B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen3.5 2B, LFM2.5 8B-A1B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseComp-ZH | 9.8% ✎ | ▄▄·▄▄▄·█···█ beats 3/8 | 2.6% |
other tests8 not in a task · 27% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 65.2% ✎ | ▂··▂█·▂▂···▂ beats 3/8 | 5.1% |
| MMLU-Redux | 80.0% ✎ | ▂···█··▂▂··▂ beats 5/8 | 4.6% |
| IFBench (aggregation unspecified) +1 | 59.0% ✎ | ▅····▃▃·█·▃▃ beats 6/8 | 4.4% |
| OJBench | 11.2% ✎ | ▃····▃▅··█▃▃ beats 2/8 | 3.2% |
| SuperGPQA | 26.2% ✎ | ▃·▃·▃▅█····▃ beats 0/8 | 2.9% |
| LongBench v2 | 30.3% ✎ | ▃······▅▅▃·█ beats 1/8 | 2.5% |
| Multi-IF (aggregation unspecified) +1 | 76.8% ✎ | ▄▄···▄·▄·▄██ beats 8/8 | 2.2% |
| Claw-Eval average score lab | 62.8% ✎ | ▄·▄··█▄▄▄▄▄▄ beats 3/9 | 1.8% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run LFM2.5 2.6B · needs ~1.67 GB · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)chat in the terminal
llama cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run LFM2.5 2.6B · needs ~1.67 GB · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run LFM2.5 2.6B · needs ~1.67 GB · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)chat in the terminal
ollama run hf.co/LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF:Q4_K_M
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run LFM2.5 2.6B · needs ~1.6 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)chat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-MLX-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-MLX-4bit
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/LiquidAI ↗
$ how the score was worked out · openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B model card 81%, LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B model ca… 18%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 81% | |
| 7 | 18% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 52.5 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json