whatmodel.sh / GLM-4.6V
GLM-4.6V
↗ share
+ contribute
GLM-4.6V is an open-weights language model from Z.ai, released December 2025. Its published size is 106B parameters and a 128k-token context window. Licence: mit.
Catalogue identity notes
Arena entry 'glm-4.6v' (text, vision). Maker repo zai-org/GLM-4.6V @4e2d47e: licence tag mit. Parameters: card: 'GLM-4.6V (106B), a foundation model designed for cloud ...' (active count not stated on the card). Released 2025-12: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2025-12-07).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of GLM-4.6V, out of 828 with a score, then more from Z.ai.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 203 | 62±1 | api $3.50/M | |||
| 204 | 62±2 | api $0.087/M +local | |||
| 205 | 62±2 | api $0.45/M +local | |||
| 206 | 62±2 | local | |||
| 207 | 62±1 | comparison only | |||
| more from Z.ai | |||||
| 33 | 76±1 | api $2.15/M +local | |||
| 52 | 74±1 | api $0.24/M +local | |||
| 57 | 74±1 | api $2.15/M +local | |||
$ what it's good at
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #129 of 393 * · 27% of its score · 1 test
Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), o3-mini, K-EXAONE (236B-A23B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 8B-A1B, LFM2.5 2.6B, Nemotron-Cascade-8B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena (text) | 1378.7 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 219/379 | 27% |
vision & documents▁▁▃▂▁▃▄▃▆▇█▄ #88 of 147 · 61% of its score · 7 tests
Beats DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct, GPT-4.1 mini here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena vision (style controlled) | 1161.5 ✎ | ▁▁▂▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 56/145 | 18% |
| CharXiv (reasoning questions) lab | 63.2% ✎ | ▂▅▃▅▅▆▆▅▆█▆▂ beats 48/100 | 10% |
| SciDocBench scientific-document workflows (overall, 496 instances) | 42.4% ✎ | ▃▃···█▃▅▃·▃▅ beats 1/11 | 8.5% |
| MMMU (val) lab | 76.0% ✎ | ▁····▁▁▄█▇▆▆ beats 41/52 | 8.5% |
| MMMU Pro lab | 66.0% ✎ | ▂▃▁▃▆▇▃▇▇██▅ beats 26/52 | 8.0% |
| MMStar lab | 75.9% ✎ | ▃▅▂▃▂▂▆█▆▆█▅ beats 22/34 | 6.3% |
| OCRBench lab | 86.5% ✎ | ▁·▃▁▆▅▂█▅█▁▃ beats 21/37 | 1.9% |
other tests2 not in a task · 11% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVBench lab | 59.5% ✎ | ▇·█▅▅▄▄··▃▁▁ beats 12/28 | 5.7% |
| AndroidWorld lab | 57.0% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▂▃█▅▂▂·▂ beats 11/24 | 5.1% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · $0.45/M · $0.3 in / $0.9 out per 1M tokens · 128k context · docs.z.ai ↗ · price sourceUSD per 1M tokens, Z.ai API pricing page, Vision Models table, GLM-4.6V: input $0.3, output $0.9; cached input $0.05 excluded. Currency: USD. Z.ai official pricing page, observed 2026-09-28.
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run GLM-4.6V · needs ~67.22 GB · from huggingface.co/unslothchat in the terminal
llama cli -hf unsloth/GLM-4.6V-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf unsloth/GLM-4.6V-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run GLM-4.6V · needs ~67.22 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/GLM-4.6V-GGUF@UD-Q4_K_XL -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/zai-org ↗
$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 45%, Z.ai GLM-V GitHub repository… 45%, SciDocBench: A Workflow-Cente… 9%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 45% | |
| 7 | 45% | |
| 1 | 9% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 62.2 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json