whatmodel.sh / HyperCLOVA X SEED 32B Think

HyperCLOVA X SEED 32B Think is an open-weights language model from NAVER Cloud, released December 2025. Its published size is 33.31B parameters and a 128k-token context window. Licence: hyperclovax.

Catalogue identity notes

NAVER Cloud's open-weights vision-language thinking model, repo naver-hyperclovax/HyperCLOVAX-SEED-Think-32B @3c2b633 (created 2025-12-23; licence tag other / hyperclovax; 14 safetensors shards, 66.63 GB). Subject of arXiv 2601.03286v1 ('HyperCLOVA X 32B Think', abbreviated THINK). Comparison-only for now: the card's only documented run route is NAVER's OmniServe Docker stack on 4x A100 80GB (clone, convert_model.py, docker compose), not a single command; no maker GGUF/ollama tag or first-party API page verified. New provider string 'NAVER Cloud' (no existing NAVER entry in data/models.json).

Model information sources

Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗

Card @3c2b633 says 'Parameters : 32B'; safetensors metadata 33,313,410,304 (vision-language model, includes the vision encoder).

61.0±1.9comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 8 benchmark results across 2 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of HyperCLOVA X SEED 32B Think, out of 828 with a score.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
219GLM-4.5V Z.ai61±2api $0.90/M +local~69GB2025-08
220Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 NVIDIA61±2local~82GB2025-04
221HyperCLOVA X SEED 32B Think NAVER Cloud61±2comparison only2025-12
222Devstral Small 2 24B Mistral61±3local~17GB2025-12
223o1-mini OpenAI61±1comparison only2024-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▂▆█▆▅▄▄▃▂▁ #143 of 340 · 81% of its score · 5 tests

Beats o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Large, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Terminal-Bench Hard lab9.9% ✎▂▅▆▂▂▆▂▂█▅▅▂ beats 13/27very hard · avg 2.3%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 23%sharp · small run
τ²-bench Telecom lab65.1% ✎▁·▅█▆▅▂▃▃▂▃▁ beats 52/89very hard · avg 13%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 19%sharp · at its level · noisy
τ²-bench Retail lab71.6% ✎▁····▂▁▃▆█▃▁ beats 30/44medium · avg 38%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 16%at its level
τ²-bench Airline lab58.0% ✎▁▁·▂▁▃▂▁█▅▂▃ beats 21/42hard · avg 29%▇▇▇▇▇ 13%at its level
K-BrowseComp-Verified (Korean web-browsing agent questions, pass@1) lab2.3% ✎▃····█··▃█·▃ beats 0/8very hard · avg 3.4%▇▇▇▇▇ 12%typical
web search▃·▂▇▅█▃▄▁▂▁▁ #92 of 92 * · 12% of its score · 1 test

Trails GPT-4.1 nano, GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18), Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
K-BrowseComp-Verified (Korean web-browsing agent questions, pass@1) lab2.3% ✎▃····█··▃█·▃ beats 0/8very hard · avg 3.4%▇▇▇▇▇ 12%typical
other tests3 not in a task · 17% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
HellaSwag lab57.2% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▇█▆▅▃ beats 17/85medium · avg 64%▇▇▇▇ 9.1%at its level · small run
MMLU lab87.7% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▅█▃▆▃ beats 171/183medium · avg 71%▇▇ 5.6%noisy · small run
PIQA lab76.7% ✎▁▁▁▃▃▄▇█▄▃▁▁ beats 48/83easy · avg 84%▇ 2.3%blunt · small run

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/naver-hyperclovax ↗

$ how the score was worked out · HyperCLOVA X 32B Think (NAVER… 87%, K-BrowseComp: A Web Browsing… 12%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
HyperCLOVA X 32B Think (NAVER Cloud, arXiv:2601.03286v1) · lab-reported7▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 87%CC-BY-4.0
K-BrowseComp: A Web Browsing Agent Benchmark Grounded in Korean Contexts (arXiv:2606.02404v1) · lab-reported1▇▇▇▇ 12%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 2%
weighted average= 61.0

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json