whatmodel.sh / Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B is an open-weights language model from NVIDIA, released June 2026. Its published size is 550B parameters (55B active per token) and a 1M-token context window. Licence: openmdw.

69.4±0.7#90 of 719 LLMsfrom 32 benchmark results across 5 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B, out of 828 with a score, then more from NVIDIA.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
96Inkling (975B-A41B) Thinking Machines70±1api $1.73/M +local~156GB2026-07
97Muse Glimmer 30B Meta70±1api $0.64/M +local~19GB2026-08
98Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B NVIDIA69±1api $1.35/M +local~89GB2026-06
99Qwen3.6 27B Alibaba69±1api $1.20/M +local~18GB2026-04
100Ring-2.6-1T inclusionAI (Ant Group)69±2comparison only2026-05
more from NVIDIA
155Nemotron Cascade 2 30B-A3B NVIDIA66±1local~20GB2026-03
168Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12B NVIDIA65±1api $0.28/M +local~73GB2026-03
177Nemotron-Labs-3 Puzzle 75B-A9B NVIDIA64±1local~35GB2026-06

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #83 of 300 · 22% of its score · 7 tests

Beats Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), GPT-5.1, Grok 4.3 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Hy3 preview (295B-A21B), MiniMax-M2.7, Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
SWE-bench Verified lab70.7% ✎█····██·████ beats 0/6hard · avg 22%▇▇ 6.0%sharp · at its level
SWE-bench Multilingual lab67.7% ✎▄··▄▄···▄▄·█ beats 0/6hard · avg 30%▇▇ 4.3%at its level
Terminal-Bench 2.1 lab56.4% ✎█··▄█·▄····▄ beats 4/6very hard · avg 12%▇▇ 4.2%at its level
BrowseComp lab44.4% ✎▄·▄▄···▄··█▄ beats 1/6hard · avg 16%▇ 2.4%at its level
Humanity's Last Exam with tools lab37.4% ✎▄····▄·█·▄·▄ beats 0/5hard · avg 16%▇ 2.2%at its level
τ³-bench lab70.9% ✎▄····▄·█·▄·█ beats 2/6medium · avg 40%▇ 2.0%blunt · at its level
τ³-bench telecom (tau2-bench ≥ v1.0.1) lab92.9% ✎▄·▄···▄·▄·█▄ beats 1/6easy · avg 77%▇ 1.4%maxed out
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #84 of 458 · 20% of its score · 6 tests

Beats Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), GPT-5.4 mini, GPT-5.1 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, GPT-5.4 nano, GLM-4.7 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
SWE-bench Verified lab70.7% ✎█····██·████ beats 0/6hard · avg 22%▇▇ 6.0%sharp · at its level
SWE-bench Multilingual lab67.7% ✎▄··▄▄···▄▄·█ beats 0/6hard · avg 30%▇▇ 4.3%at its level
LiveCodeBench v6 (window unspecified) lab89.0% ✎██···█··████ beats 3/6medium · avg 45%▇ 2.8%typical
SciCode subproblems lab44.6% ✎▃····▃··█·▃▃ beats 1/6hard · avg 17%▇ 2.7%at its level
LiveCodeBench v6 (Feb–May 2025)76.4% ✎▄··█····▄▄·█ beats 2/6medium · avg 45%▇ 2.2%typical
SciCode (level unspecified)39.9% ✎▄·····▄█▄▄·▄ beats 1/6hard · avg 16%▇ 2.2%at its level
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #81 of 393 * · 4.4% of its score · 1 test

Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), Inkling Small (266B-A12B), Muse Glimmer 30B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 4 12B, Gemma 4 26B-A4B, Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1426.2 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 279/379avg 1268▇▇ 4.4%blunt
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #108 of 398 · 6.6% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Claude Sonnet 4.6, MiniMax-M3 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemini 2.5 Flash, Qwen3-VL 32B Thinking, gpt-oss-120b here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
IMO-AnswerBench lab88.6% ✎▄····▄·▄▄·█▄ beats 3/6medium · avg 40%▇ 2.4%typical
OTIS mock AIME 2024–202586.7% ✎▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 135/193very hard · avg 8.5%▇ 2.3%sharp · noisy
AIME 202685.4% ✎▄·▄·▄▄··█··▄ beats 0/6medium · avg 56%▇ 1.9%sharp · maxed out · noisy
web search▂▁▃▆▄█▃▃▁▁·▁ #71 of 80 * · 4.6% of its score · 2 tests

Trails GPT-4.1 nano, GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18), Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BrowseComp lab44.4% ✎▄·▄▄···▄··█▄ beats 1/6hard · avg 16%▇ 2.4%at its level
Humanity's Last Exam with tools lab37.4% ✎▄····▄·█·▄·▄ beats 0/5hard · avg 16%▇ 2.2%at its level
other tests15 not in a task · 56% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA Diamond +185.4% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 147/208hard · avg 45%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 14%sharp · several runs
Humanity's Last Exam lab +126.7% ✎▄··█▄··▄·▄·▄ beats 1/6very hard · avg 5.6%▇▇▇ 8.2%at its level · several runs
GPQA (subset unspecified) lab87.0% ✎▄█▄▄·▄·····▄ beats 2/6hard · avg 47%▇▇▇ 7.6%sharp
MMLU-Pro lab86.8% ✎▄·····▄▄▄·▄█ beats 3/6medium · avg 53%▇▇ 4.4%typical
Global-MMLU-Lite90.9% ✎▃······▅··█▃ beats 5/6medium · avg 60%▇▇ 4.1%typical
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch)20.0% ✎█··▂▃▇▄█▂▃▁▁ beats 35/74very hard · avg 9.4%▇ 2.6%sharp · too hard for it · noisy
LongBench v2 lab61.9% ✎▂·▁·▂▂▁▃▄▁█▄ beats 25/28very hard · avg 34%▇ 2.5%at its level
MMLU-ProX lab83.0% ✎▄·····▄·▄▄█▄ beats 1/6medium · avg 57%▇ 2.5%typical
7 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
IFBench (aggregation unspecified)81.4% ✎▃······█▃▃·▃ beats 6/6medium · avg 44%▇ 2.4%typical
Chess Puzzles (Epoch)12.0% ✎█▁▁▁▁▃▁▄▂▂▁▁ beats 62/135very hard · avg 5.9%▇ 2.3%sharp · noisy
IFBench prompt-level (loose) lab81.7% ✎▄▄·▄··▄▄···█ beats 5/6medium · avg 45%▇ 2.1%typical
MultiChallenge lab63.8% ✎▁··········█ beats 4/6hard · avg 27%▇ 1.9%at its level
CritPt lab3.1% ✎▄····▄█···█▄ beats 2/6very hard · avg 1.0%▇ 1.0%too hard for it · noisy
WMT25 Terminology Translation (term success rate)84.8% ✎▂·▂··▂·▄▂·█▆ beats 4/12medium · avg 64%▇ 0.7%noisy
WMT26 General MT (GEMBA-ESA, LLM judge)67.1% ✎▄·▄▄▄·▄██▄█▄ beats 1/12easy · avg 65%▇ 0.3%blunt

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · Together AI · $1.35/M · $0.6 in / $3.6 out per 1M tokens · 1M context · docs.together.ai ↗ · price sourceStandard base token rate from models.dev. Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ.

llama.cpp · recommended

version

  1. Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.
    macOS / Linux
    curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
    Windows
    irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex

    other ways to install ↗

  2. Run Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B · needs ~330.5 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth
    chat in the terminal
    llama cli -hf unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL
  3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
    llama serve -hf unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL

LM Studio

version

  1. Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.

    download it (macOS / Windows / Linux) ↗

  2. Run Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B · needs ~330.5 GB · from huggingface.co/unsloth

    open in LM Studio ↗

  3. Or download it in the terminal
    lms get https://huggingface.co/unsloth/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-GGUF@UD-Q4_K_XL -y
  4. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name

MLX (Mac)

version

  1. Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.
    with uv
    uv tool install mlx-lm
    or
    pip install mlx-lm
  2. Run Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B · needs ~309.3 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/pipenetwork
    chat in the terminal
    mlx_lm.chat --model pipenetwork/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-MLX-4bit
  3. Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
    mlx_lm.server --model pipenetwork/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-MLX-4bit

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/nvidia ↗

$ how the score was worked out · NVIDIA — Nemotron 3 Ultra tec… 57%, A.X K2 Technical Report (SK T… 25%, Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 13% and 2 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
NVIDIA — Nemotron 3 Ultra technical report · lab-reported18▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 57%CC BY 4.0
A.X K2 Technical Report (SK Telecom), arXiv 2608.30181v17▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 25%CC BY 4.0
Epoch AI — internal evaluations4▇▇▇▇ 13%CC BY 4.0
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇ 4%CC BY 4.0
Cohere — North Small Translate (arXiv:2609.13916v1)2▇ 1%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 0%
weighted average= 69.4

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json