whatmodel.sh / Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B A9B

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B A9B is an open-weights language model from NVIDIA, released October 2026. Its published size is 74B parameters (9B active per token) and a 262k-token context window. Licence: open-mdw-1.1.

Catalogue identity notes

Precision is retained in each measurement: lab rows BF16; Super VL Arena rows NVFP4. Quantized deployment is not a separate checkpoint ranking.

Model information sources

Release date ↗

68.4±2.0#98 of 729 LLMsfrom 5 benchmark results across 1 source

Score within the LMArena (text) comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B A9B, out of 882 with a score, then more from NVIDIA.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
105Ring-2.6-1T inclusionAI (Ant Group)68±2comparison only2026-05
106Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVIDIA68±1local~254GB2026-10
107Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B A9B NVIDIA68±2local~157GB2026-10
108A.X K2 (688B-A33B) SK Telecom68±1local~1454GB2026-07
109MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B) Xiaomi68±1api $0.21/M +local~100GB2026-04
more from NVIDIA
102Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B NVIDIA69±1api $1.35/M +local~89GB2026-06
168Nemotron Cascade 2 30B-A3B NVIDIA65±1local~20GB2026-03
179Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12B NVIDIA64±1api $0.28/M +local~73GB2026-03

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▅▅▅▅▄▂▁ #83 of 310 · 39% of its score · 3 tests

Beats GPT-5, Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), GPT-5.1 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails MiMo-V2.5 (310B-A15B) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Terminal-Bench 2.1 lab53.9% ✎▁·▁·▁▁▄▃▅█▅█ beats 19/61hard · avg 15%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 20%sharp · at its level · small run
BrowseComp lab70.0% ✎▂·▃▁▂▂▆▄█▂▂▄ beats 33/44hard · avg 29%▇▇▇▇▇ 13%at its level · small run
τ³-bench Banking lab17.0% ✎▂▂·▅█▂▃▃▃▆▂▅ beats 16/24very hard · avg 6.3%▇▇ 6.0%blunt · small run
codingnot ranked on this task yet · 1 test
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
SciCode (level unspecified) lab44.5% ✎▁····▃▄▄▅█▇▃ beats 32/37very hard · avg 13%—not counted yet: no other model in the same run to compare it with
web search█··········█ #2 of 2 * · 13% of its score · 1 test
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BrowseComp lab70.0% ✎▂·▃▁▂▂▆▄█▂▂▄ beats 33/44hard · avg 29%▇▇▇▇▇ 13%at its level · small run
other tests3 not in a task · 59% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA Diamond lab88.8% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅█▇█▄ beats 258/315hard · avg 46%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 34%sharp · small run
Humanity's Last Exam lab28.7% ✎▁▁▁▄▅▆▆██▆▁▃ beats 69/108very hard · avg 5.4%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 25%at its level · small run
MCP-Atlas v1 public500 lab55.6% ✎█·····█····█ beats 0/2—not counted yet: no other model in the same run to compare it with

$ where to run it

Other ways to run it

  1. Run it as published · needs ~148 GB, NVIDIA only · from huggingface.co/nvidia (official)
    wget https://huggingface.co/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-BF16/resolve/main/ultra_v3_reasoning_parser.py export VLLM_USE_V2_MODEL_RUNNER=1 vllm serve nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Bolt-74B-A9B-BF16 \ --trust-remote-code \ --load-format auto \ --tensor-parallel-size 1 \ --max-model-len 262144 \ --max-num-seqs 1 \ --enable-chunked-prefill \ --attention-backend FLASHINFER \ --mamba-backend flashinfer \ --mamba-cache-mode align \ --seed 42 \ --allowed-local-media-path / \ --limit-mm-per-prompt '{"video":1,"image":1}' \ --video-pruning-rate 0.5 \ --media-io-kwargs '{"video":{"fps":2,"num_frames":256}}' \ --enable-auto-tool-choice \ --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder \ --reasoning-parser-plugin ultra_v3_reasoning_parser.py \ --reasoning-parser ultra_v3

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/nvidia ↗

$ how the score was worked out · NVIDIA vendor-reported benchm… 98%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
NVIDIA vendor-reported benchmark scores for its own Nemotron models (Hugging Face model cards) · lab-reported5Factual vendor-reported score (not licensed content)
prior · pull toward the middle
weighted average= 68.4

not counted (2)

NVIDIA vendor-reported benchmark scores for its own Nemotron models (Hugging Face model cards)SciCode (level unspecified) [correct]44.5%fewer than three models have this test yet, or this source ran it for this model alone
NVIDIA vendor-reported benchmark scores for its own Nemotron models (Hugging Face model cards)MCP-Atlas v1 public500 [correct]55.6%fewer than three models have this test yet, or this source ran it for this model alone

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json