whatmodel.sh / Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast is a closed-weights language model from SpaceXAI (xAI), released September 2025.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entries 'grok-4-fast-reasoning' (text, webdev), 'grok-4-fast-chat' (text), 'grok-4-fast-search' (search). Released 2025-09: xAI 'Grok 4 Fast' post dated Sep 19, 2025. xAI: 'Grok 4 Fast introduces a unified architecture where reasoning ... and non-reasoning ... are handled by the same model weights, steered via system prompts', so the reasoning/chat entries are one model. grok-4-fast-reasoning/-non-reasoning retired from the API on May 15, 2026.

61.3±1.5comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 9 benchmark results across 5 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Grok 4 Fast, out of 828 with a score, then more from SpaceXAI (xAI).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
216Gemini 2.5 Flash Google62±1api $0.85/M2025-06
217MiniMax-M1 (40k) MiniMax61±1comparison only2025-06
218Grok 4 Fast SpaceXAI (xAI)61±2comparison only2025-09
219GLM-4.5V Z.ai61±2api $0.90/M +local~69GB2025-08
220Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 NVIDIA61±2local~82GB2025-04
more from SpaceXAI (xAI)
30Grok 4.6 SpaceXAI (xAI)77±1api $3.00/M2026-08
42Grok 4.5 SpaceXAI (xAI)75±1api $3.00/M2026-07
47Grok 4.7 SpaceXAI (xAI)75±1api $3.00/M2026-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▂▆█▆▅▄▄▃▂▁ #128 of 340 * · 7.0% of its score · 1 test

Beats o3-pro, o3, GPT-5 mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Large here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
τ³-bench banking_knowledge (v1.0.1 grading)15.7% ✎▃▃▃▃·▆▃▂█▅▅▂ beats 4/25very hard · avg 4.1%▇▇▇ 7.0%typical
coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #240 of 524 * · 35% of its score · 1 test

Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, Ministral 3 3B Reasoning 2512, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Instruct (0724) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)1158.9 ✎▁▃▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 1/119avg 981▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 35%sharp
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #120 of 463 * · 20% of its score · 1 test

Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), GPT-5.4 nano, Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B) here, though they rank higher overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1404.9 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 250/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 20%blunt
vision & documents▁▁▃▃▂▃▅▄▇▇█▃ #154 of 182 * · 11% of its score · 2 tests

Trails Qwen3.5 2B, Qwen3-VL 2B Thinking, Molmo 72B (0924) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
CharXiv (reasoning questions)33.5% ✎▄·····▄▄·▄·█ beats 0/5hard · avg 33%▇▇▇ 7.0%at its level
CharXiv descriptive questions68.2% ✎▄····▄···█▄▄ beats 0/5easy · avg 68%▇▇ 4.3%noisy
web search▂·▂▇▅█▃▄▁▂▁▁ #59 of 92 * · 8.1% of its score · 1 test

Beats Kimi K2.6, GPT-5 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro (Preview, Apr 2026) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18), Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503), Llama 4 Scout (109B-A17B) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena search systems (style controlled)1160.3 ✎▁·▁▁▂▃▂█▅▂▁▁ beats 6/30avg 1055▇▇▇ 8.1%blunt
other tests3 not in a task · 17% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
ARC-AGI-1 public evaluation set (ARC Prize model_baseline, pass@2)58.1% ✎▁·▇▃▁·█▇▁·▇▃ beats 10/27very hard · avg 4.1%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 14%sharp · at its level · noisy
ARC-AGI-2 public evaluation set (ARC Prize model_baseline, pass@2)4.6% ✎█··▂▅▁▃▁▃·▁▃ beats 9/24very hard · avg 0.3%▇ 3.5%sharp · too hard for it · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate)79.8% ✎▁▃▁▂▅█▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 4/98very easy · avg 90%▇ 0.0%blunt

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 63%, ARC Prize Foundation model_ba… 17%, ServiceNow-AI/Apriel-1.6-15b-… 11% and 2 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json