Best image editing models
A leaderboard of the best image editing models. GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst is #1 right now, followed by GPT Image 2.5 Flare and GPT Image 2. Models are ranked on human votes and image editing tests. Filter by your computer or budget to find the best one you can use.
Scores use reviewed image to image / editing evaluations only. Compare scores within this task. Models without task measurements are excluded.
+ more
$ terminal
↗ share
detecting your OS…
Score vs API price
● open weights ◆ API only ─┘ best score for the price · x: USD per image (log)
| # | model | task score↓ | where↓ | speed↓ | sources |
|---|
| # | model | task score↓ | where↓ | speed↓ | sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 83±3* | api $0.013/image | |||
| 2 | 78±3* | api $0.013/image | |||
| 3 | 76±3* | api $0.053/image | |||
| 4 | 72±3* | comparison only | |||
| 5 | 72±3* | api $0.034/image | |||
| 6 | 72±3* | api $0.040/image | |||
| 7 | 69±3* | api $0.010/image | |||
| 8 | 69±3* | comparison only | |||
| 9 | 68±2 | api $0.13/image | |||
| 10 | 68±3* | api $0.050/image | |||
| 11 | 68±3* | api $0.034/image | |||
| 12 | 68±2 | api $0.067/image | |||
| 13 | 66±3* | api $0.25/image | |||
| 14 | 66±7* | api $0.050/image | |||
| 15 | 66±3* | local | |||
| 16 | 65±3* | api $0.25/image | |||
| 17 | 63±3* | comparison only | |||
| 18 | 63±2 | api $0.034/image | |||
| 19 | 62±3* | api $0.10/image | |||
| 20 | 61±3* | api $0.020/image | |||
| 21 | 60±3* | api $0.040/image | |||
| 22 | 59±3* | api $0.034/image | |||
| 23 | 59±3* | api $0.035/image | |||
| 24 | 58±3* | api $0.075/image | |||
| 25 | 58±3* | api $0.090/image +local | |||
| 26 | 58±3* | api $0.075/image | |||
| 27 | 58±2 | api $0.040/image | |||
| 28 | 58±2* | api $0.030/image | |||
| 29 | 54±8* | comparison only | |||
| 30 | 54±3* | api $0.070/image | |||
| 31 | 54±3* | comparison only | |||
| 32 | 53±3* | api $0.030/image | |||
| 33 | 53±3* | api $0.028/image | |||
| 34 | 52±2 | api $0.039/image | |||
| 35 | 52±2 | api $0.040/image | |||
| 36 | 51±3 | api $0.030/image +local | |||
| 37 | 51±2 | api $0.042/image | |||
| 38 | 51±2 | api $0.030/image +local | |||
| 39 | 51±3* | api $0.015/image +local | |||
| 40 | 51±3* | comparison only | |||
| 41 | 50±2 | api $0.15/image +local | |||
| 42 | 50±3* | api $0.030/image | |||
| 43 | 50±3* | api $0.050/image | |||
| 44 | 49±5* | comparison only | |||
| 45 | 49±3* | comparison only | |||
| 46 | 49±5* | api $0.040/image | |||
| 47 | 49±2 | api $0.030/image +local | |||
| 48 | 49±2 | api $0.046/image +local | |||
| 49 | 48±3* | api $0.010/image | |||
| 50 | 48±3* | comparison only | |||
| 51 | 47±3* | api $0.0011/image +local | |||
| 52 | 47±6* | api $0.015/image +local | |||
| 53 | 47±3* | comparison only | |||
| 54 | 46±2 | local | |||
| 55 | 46±5* | api $0.060/image | |||
| 56 | 46±5* | api $0.025/image +local | |||
| 57 | 45±3* | api $0.030/image | |||
| 58 | 45±3* | api $0.080/image | |||
| 59 | 44±3* | comparison only | |||
| 60 | 42±5*† | comparison only | |||
| 61 | 42±3* | api $0.011/image | |||
| 62 | 39±4 | local | |||
| 63 | 39±3 | comparison only | |||
| 64 | 39±2 | api $0.040/image | |||
| 65 | 36±2 | api $0.025/image +local | |||
| 66 | 36±3* | comparison only | |||
| 67 | 34±3* | local | |||
| 68 | 34±7* | api $0.040/image | |||
| 69 | 34±2 | api $0.15/image +local | |||
| 70 | 33±2 | api $0.10/image +local | |||
| 71 | 33±7* | api $0.065/image +local | |||
| 72 | 32±7* | local | |||
| 73 | 32±3* | comparison only | |||
| 74 | 30±7*† | local | |||
| 75 | 30±3 | comparison only | |||
| 76 | 27±3* | comparison only | |||
| 77 | 24±3* | comparison only | |||
| 78 | 19±5* | local | |||
| 79 | 18±5* | comparison only | |||
| 80 | 14±5* | local | |||
| 81 | 10±4 | local |
Includes 19 comparison-only models with no verified API or download · hide them
81 of 81 catalogue models listed here · sources and licences
* new or thinly tested: ranked on too few benchmark results · † only the maker’s own numbers so far · ~RAM is estimated; full context may need more memory