whatmodel.sh / image / Wan 2.7 Image
Wan 2.7 Image
↗ share
+ contribute
Wan 2.7 Image is a closed-weights image model from Alibaba, released April 2026.
Model information sources
Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The image models ranked either side of Wan 2.7 Image, out of 197 with a score, then more from Alibaba.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | 62±3 | api $0.090/image +local | |||
| 39 | 62±1 | api $0.039/image | |||
| 40 | 62±2 | api $0.030/image | |||
| 41 | 61±2 | api $0.060/image | |||
| 42 | 61±1 | api $0.042/image | |||
| more from Alibaba | |||||
| 11 | 75±2 | api $0.040/image | |||
| 18 | 69±2 | local | |||
| 20 | 67±2 | api $0.075/image | |||
$ what it's good at
text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #52 of 126 * · 46% of its score · 1 test
Trails Qwen-Image-2512, HunyuanImage 3.0, Z-Image (Base) here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena text-to-image | 1101.1 ✎ | ▂▂▃▄▇█▄▂▄▂·▂ beats 25/75 | 46% |
image to image / editing▁▁·▃▂▃█▃▃▄▁▁ #25 of 62 * · 53% of its score · 2 tests
Beats FLUX.2 [max], FLUX.2 [pro], FLUX.2 [flex] here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edit-Compass (EN, overall) | 64.6% ✎ | ▃▃▂·▃▆▂█·▃·▃ beats 18/20 | 36% |
| Arena image edit | 1301.2 ✎ | ▂▁▁▂▆▇█▄▆▅▁▂ beats 28/53 | 17% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · $0.030/image · www.alibabacloud.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per output image, Singapore (international) deployment; only output is billed; China (Beijing) lists $0.027504; wan2.7-image-pro $0.075. Free quota and promotions excluded. Product: Alibaba Cloud Model Studio image generation. API model: wan2.7-image. Settings: region=Singapore (international), n=1. Price basis: published list rate. Currency: USD. Alibaba Cloud official model pricing page, observed 2026-09-26.
$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 63%, Edit-Compass & EditReward-Com… 36%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 63% | |
| 1 | 36% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 61.7 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json