whatmodel.sh / image / Seedream 4.5

Seedream 4.5 is a closed-weights image model from ByteDance.

63.9±1.3#25 of 144 image modelsfrom 8 benchmark results across 7 sources

Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The image models ranked either side of Seedream 4.5, out of 197 with a score, then more from ByteDance.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
28Grok Imagine Image Pro SpaceXAI (xAI)65±2api $0.050/image
29Seedream 5.0 Lite ByteDance Seed65±2api $0.035/image2026-02
30Seedream 4.5 ByteDance64±1api $0.040/image
31Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro Recraft64±2api $0.21/image2026-05
32FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs64±1api $0.070/image2025-12
more from ByteDance
129UNO ByteDance43±4local~16GB2025-04
156SDXL-Lightning (4-step UNet) ByteDance37±3local~4.9GB2024-02

see all image models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #28 of 126 · 61% of its score · 3 tests

Trails FLUX.2 [flex], FLUX.2 [pro], FLUX.2 [max] here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GenExam (relaxed overall, GPT-5 judge)59.5% ✎▄█▂▂▂▂▆▄·▂·▂ beats 12/16hard · avg 26%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 35%sharp · at its level
LMArena text-to-image1148.5 ✎▂▂▃▄▇█▄▂▄▂·▂ beats 43/75avg 1027▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 23%typical
Qwen-Image-Bench (Q-Judger, v1)56.8% ✎█▅▅·▅▅█·█··▃ beats 11/17medium · avg 46%▇ 2.5%blunt · at its level
image to image / editing▁▁·▃▂▃█▃▃▄▁▁ #24 of 62 · 35% of its score · 4 tests

Trails HunyuanImage 3.0-Instruct, Wan 2.7 Image Pro here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Edit-Compass (EN, overall)64.4% ✎▃▃▂·▃▆▂█·▃·▃ beats 17/20hard · avg 45%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 18%at its level
Arena image edit1301.9 ✎▂▁▁▂▆▇█▄▆▅▁▂ beats 29/53avg 1153▇▇▇▇ 8.9%typical
GEBench GUI state generation (English GE-Score)50.0% ✎▄▄····▄▄█▄·█ beats 3/8hard · avg 34%▇▇ 4.5%at its level
GEditBench v2 (overall Elo)1089.0 ✎▃▂····▂█▂▃▂▃ beats 13/14avg 956▇ 3.5%blunt
other tests1 not in a task · 3.7% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Rapidata Benchmark.ai image benchmark (overall Elo)1046.7 ✎▁▁▁▄▂█▃▁▁▂▁▁ beats 25/34avg 875▇ 3.7%typical

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · BytePlus ModelArk · $0.040/image · docs.byteplus.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per output image on BytePlus ModelArk; input images free; failed/moderated images not billed; sequential generation billed per generated image. Product: BytePlus ModelArk image generation. API model: seedream-4-5-251128. Settings: n=1. Price basis: published list rate. Currency: USD. BytePlus official pricing page, observed 2026-09-25.

$ how the score was worked out · GenExam: A Multidisciplinary… 35%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 32%, Edit-Compass & EditReward-Com… 18% and 4 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json