whatmodel.sh / image / FLUX.2 [max]

FLUX.2 [max] is a closed-weights image model from Black Forest Labs, released December 2025. Licence: proprietary.

63.6±1.4#27 of 144 image modelsfrom 7 benchmark results across 6 sources

Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The image models ranked either side of FLUX.2 [max], out of 197 with a score, then more from Black Forest Labs.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
30Seedream 4.5 ByteDance64±1api $0.040/image
31Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro Recraft64±2api $0.21/image2026-05
32FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs64±1api $0.070/image2025-12
33Wan 2.7 Image Pro Alibaba63±2api $0.075/image2026-04
34Reve V1.5 Reve63±3comparison only2026-02
more from Black Forest Labs
36FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs63±2api $0.030/image2025-11
37FLUX.2 [flex] Black Forest Labs62±2api $0.050/image2025-11
61FLUX.2 [dev] Black Forest Labs58±1api $0.046/image +local~20GB2025-11

see all image models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #23 of 126 · 78% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Grok Imagine Image Pro, Seedream 5.0 Lite, Seedream 4.5 here, though they rank higher overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GenExam (relaxed overall, GPT-5 judge)61.6% ✎▄█▂▂▂▂▆▄·▂·▂ beats 13/16hard · avg 26%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 45%sharp · at its level
LMArena text-to-image1162.1 ✎▂▂▃▄▇█▄▂▄▂·▂ beats 50/75avg 1027▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 30%typical
Qwen-Image-Bench (Q-Judger, v1)55.3% ✎█▅▅·▅▅█·█··▃ beats 9/17medium · avg 46%▇ 3.2%blunt · at its level
image to image / editing▁▁·▃▂▃█▃▃▄▁▁ #26 of 62 * · 11% of its score · 1 test

Trails Wan 2.7 Image, HunyuanImage 3.0-Instruct, Wan 2.7 Image Pro here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena image edit1261.7 ✎▂▁▁▂▆▇█▄▆▅▁▂ beats 23/53avg 1153▇▇▇▇▇ 11%typical
other tests3 not in a task · 10% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Rapidata Benchmark.ai image benchmark (overall Elo)992.8 ✎▁▁▁▄▂█▂▁▁▂▁▁ beats 16/34avg 875▇▇ 4.7%typical
EdiVal multi-turn editing overall (EdiVal-O after turn 3)58.1% ✎▂·▂▃·▂·▃▂·▃█ beats 11/14medium · avg 42%▇▇ 4.2%blunt · at its level
Knowledge Visualization T2I (Brief Caption, English overall)35.0% ✎▅·▃·▃··▃·█▃▃ beats 7/9hard · avg 28%▇ 1.0%blunt · at its level

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · $0.070/image · docs.bfl.ai ↗ · price sourceUSD for a text-to-image output of up to 1 megapixel (the first-megapixel rate; each additional output megapixel adds $0.03). Matches the "from $0.07" text-to-image figure in the BFL API docs (1 credit = $0.01). Product: BFL API. API model: flux-2-max. Settings: output <=1 MP (e.g. 1024×1024), no input images, single image. Price basis: published first-megapixel list rate. Currency: USD. Black Forest Labs official pricing page, observed 2026-09-25.

$ how the score was worked out · GenExam: A Multidisciplinary… 45%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 41%, Rapidata/text-to-image-human-… 5% and 3 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json