whatmodel.sh / image / GPT Image 1 Mini

GPT Image 1 Mini is a closed-weights image model from OpenAI, released October 2025. Licence: proprietary.

58.6±1.5#49 of 144 image modelsfrom 5 benchmark results across 3 sources

Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The image models ranked either side of GPT Image 1 Mini, out of 197 with a score, then more from OpenAI.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
55FireRed-Image-Edit-1.1 FireRedTeam (Xiaohongshu)59±4comparison only2026-03
56Krea 2 Turbo Krea59±3api $0.015/image +local~20GB2026-06
57GPT Image 1 Mini OpenAI59±2api $0.011/image2025-10
58Krea 2 Large Krea59±3api $0.060/image2026-05
59Qwen-Image-Edit-2509 Alibaba59±3api $0.030/image +local~26GB2025-09
more from OpenAI
1GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst OpenAI92±2api $0.013/image2026-09
2GPT Image 2.5 Flare OpenAI88±2api $0.013/image2026-09
3GPT Image 2 OpenAI85±1api $0.053/image2026-04

see all image models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #45 of 126 * · 48% of its score · 2 tests

Beats Wan 2.7 Image, Krea 2 Turbo here, though they rank higher overall. Trails FLUX.2 [dev] here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena text-to-image1109.8 ✎▂▂▃▄▇█▄▂▄▂·▂ beats 27/75avg 1027▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 34%typical
ServImage task acceptance (human payment decisions, commercial design tasks)32.4% ✎▂▃··▂··▃█··▂ beats 10/11hard · avg 18%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 15%sharp · at its level
image to image / editing▁▁·▃▂▃█▃▃▄▁▁ #49 of 62 * · 27% of its score · 2 tests

Trails GLM-Image, FLUX.2 [klein] 4B, Ideogram 3.0 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
ServImage task acceptance (human payment decisions, commercial design tasks)32.4% ✎▂▃··▂··▃█··▂ beats 10/11hard · avg 18%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 15%sharp · at its level
Arena image edit1124.2 ✎▂▁▃▂▆▇█▄▆▅▁▂ beats 3/53avg 1153▇▇▇▇▇ 13%typical
other tests2 not in a task · 38% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
VVRBench accuracy (10,000 verifiable synthetic-scene tasks)26.4% ✎▃·█▅▃·▅▃···▃ beats 9/10very hard · avg 7.6%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 35%sharp
VVRBench-Challenge accuracy (720 harder verifiable tasks)0.3% ✎▄·▄···█·▄▄·▄ beats 0/6very hard · avg 0.6%▇ 2.3%sharp · too hard for it

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · $0.011/image · developers.openai.com ↗ · price sourceUSD for one generated 1024×1024 medium-quality image. Output-only published price; input text/image token charges are additional. Scheduled deprecation 2026-12-01. Product: Image generation API. API model: gpt-image-1-mini. Settings: quality=medium, width=1024, height=1024, n=1. Price basis: generated image output component. Additional/excluded charges: input text/image tokens. Currency: USD.

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 47%, Verifiable Visual Rewards Tra… 38%, ServImage: An Image Generatio… 15%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 47%CC BY 4.0
Verifiable Visual Rewards Transfer from Synthetic Scenes to Natural Prompts (VVRBench), arXiv:2609.35641v12▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 38%CC-BY-4.0
ServImage: An Image Generation and Editing Benchmark from Real-world Commercial Imaging Services (arXiv:2604.24023v2)1▇▇▇▇ 15%CC-BY-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 58.6

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json