whatmodel.sh / image / FLUX.1 Kontext [dev]

FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] is an open-weights image model from Black Forest Labs, released June 2025. Its published size is 12B parameters. Licence: flux-1-dev-non-commercial-license.

Model information sources

Release date ↗ · Parameter count ↗

12B = the rectified flow transformer as Black Forest Labs states it on the card; the text encoders and VAE used by the pipeline are not included (same convention as flux-1-dev).

44.3±1.3#94 of 144 image modelsfrom 15 benchmark results across 13 sources

Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The image models ranked either side of FLUX.1 Kontext [dev], out of 197 with a score, then more from Black Forest Labs.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
124DeepGen 1.0 DeepGen Team45±3comparison only2026-02
125DALL·E 3 OpenAI44±1comparison only2023-10
126FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] Black Forest Labs44±1api $0.025/image +local~21GB2025-06
127FLUX.1 [dev] Black Forest Labs44±1api $0.025/image +local~7.7GB2024-08
128UniPic2-SD3.5M-Kontext-2B Skywork AI44±6comparison only2025-08
more from Black Forest Labs
32FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs64±1api $0.070/image2025-12
36FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs63±2api $0.030/image2025-11
37FLUX.2 [flex] Black Forest Labs62±2api $0.050/image2025-11

see all image models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #88 of 126 * · 27% of its score · 1 test

Beats Latent Diffusion text2img-large (LDM-KL-8-G, LAION-400M), VQ-Diffusion (ITHQ) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Playground v2.5, Playground v2 (1024px aesthetic), Show-o2 7B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena text-to-image941.1 ✎▃▂▃▄▇█▄▂▄▂·▂ beats 2/75avg 1027▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 27%typical
image to image / editing▁▁·▃▃▃█▃▃▄▁▁ #52 of 62 · 57% of its score · 9 tests

Beats FLUX1.1 [pro] here, though they rank higher overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Edit-Compass (EN, overall)38.6% ✎▃▃▂·▃▆▂█·▃·▃ beats 9/20hard · avg 45%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 15%typical
Arena image edit1149.2 ✎▂▁▁▃▆▇█▄▆▅▁▂ beats 6/53avg 1153▇▇▇▇ 10%typical
CEdit-Bench-CN overall (G_O, GPT-4o judge)15.1% ✎▃·········█▂ beats 1/7medium · avg 42%▇▇▇ 6.9%sharp · at its level · noisy
CEdit-Bench-EN overall (G_O, GPT-4o judge)59.3% ✎▄·▄···▄██··▄ beats 0/7easy · avg 66%▇▇ 6.1%at its level
UnicBench (EN, overall)68.0% ✎▂····▂▄▃▄·█▂ beats 4/11easy · avg 73%▇▇ 5.8%at its level
GEditBench v2 (overall Elo)869.0 ✎▃▂····▂█▂▃▂▃ beats 1/14avg 956▇▇ 4.0%blunt
CREval-Bench creative image editing (Overall, GPT-4o QA evaluator)74.8% ✎▄█▄··█··▄·▄▄ beats 4/8easy · avg 74%▇ 3.4%blunt · at its level
MultiTextEdit cross-lingual text-in-image editing (SemAvg, LVM judge)48.0% ✎▄·▄▄▄▄··█▄·▄ beats 4/8medium · avg 50%▇ 3.0%at its level
1 more test
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
ImagenWorld text-guided editing (human overall)70.0% ✎█··█··██···█ beats 3/4easy · avg 73%▇ 2.5%blunt · at its level
other tests5 not in a task · 16% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
RealPref-Bench image editing (human user-study score)66.9% ✎█▄▄····▄···▄ beats 1/5easy · avg 78%▇▇ 6.1%at its level
WEAVEBench in-context multi-turn editing (Avg)68.9% ✎█▄▄·▄▄▄▄█·▄█ beats 12/12medium · avg 65%▇ 3.7%at its level
EdiVal multi-turn editing overall (EdiVal-O after turn 3)38.7% ✎▂·▂▃·▂·▃▂·▃█ beats 5/14medium · avg 42%▇ 3.5%blunt · at its level
ViGoR-Bench zero-shot visual reasoning, image models (Result Avg)38.9% ✎▂···▂·▂█▆▅·▂ beats 11/15hard · avg 31%▇ 1.3%at its level
PaintBench precise editing (mIoU, 20-task average)3.9% ✎▃·····█▅▃·▃▅ beats 3/9very hard · avg 4.3%▇ 1.3%too hard for it

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · Replicate · $0.025/image · replicate.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per output image on Replicate's official black-forest-labs/flux-kontext-dev model (billing: $0.025 per output image, "or 40 images for $1"; hardware time not added). The current version is served from replicate-pruna/flux-kontext-dev (Pruna-optimized deployment). Product: Replicate model API. API model: black-forest-labs/flux-kontext-dev. Settings: one output image. Price basis: published list rate. fal's fal-ai/flux-kontext/dev bills $0.025 per megapixel, rounded up to the nearest megapixel. Currency: USD. Not a BFL direct tariff. Replicate official model page, observed 2026-09-26.

Other ways to run it

version

  1. Run it as published · needs ~21.3 GB · from github.com/leejet
    sd-cli -r input.png --diffusion-model models/flux1-kontext-dev-Q4_K_M.gguf --vae models/ae.safetensors --clip_l models/clip_l.safetensors --t5xxl models/t5xxl_fp16.safetensors -p "change 'flux.cpp' to 'kontext.cpp'" --cfg-scale 1.0 --sampling-method euler -v --clip-on-cpu

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/black-forest-labs ↗

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 37%, Edit-Compass & EditReward-Com… 15%, Meituan LongCat — LongCat-Ima… 13% and 10 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 37%CC BY 4.0
Edit-Compass & EditReward-Compass: A Unified Benchmark for Image Editing and Reward Modeling1▇▇▇▇ 15%CC-BY-4.0
Meituan LongCat — LongCat-Image technical report2▇▇▇▇ 13%CC BY 4.0
HP-Edit: A Human-Preference Post-Training Framework for Image Editing (arXiv:2604.19406v1)1▇▇ 6%CC-BY-4.0
UnicEdit-10M: A Dataset and Benchmark Breaking the Scale-Quality Barrier via Unified Verification for Reasoning-Enriched Edits1▇▇ 6%CC-BY-4.0
GEditBench v2: A Human-Aligned Benchmark for General Image Editing1▇ 4%CC-BY-4.0
WEAVE: Unleashing and Benchmarking the In-context Interleaved Comprehension and Generation (arXiv:2511.11434v1)1▇ 4%CC-BY-4.0
EdiVal-Agent: An Object-Centric Framework for Automated, Fine-Grained Evaluation of Multi-Turn Editing (arXiv:2509.13399v3)1▇ 3%CC-BY-4.0
CREval: An Automated Interpretable Evaluation for Creative Image Manipulation under Complex Instructions (arXiv:2603.26174v1)1▇ 3%CC-BY-4.0
MultiTextEdit: Benchmarking Cross-Lingual Degradation in Text-in-Image Editing (arXiv:2605.08163v2), Table 31▇ 3%CC BY 4.0
ImagenWorld: Stress-Testing Image Generation Models with Explainable Human Evaluation on Open-ended Real-World Tasks1▇ 2%CC-BY-4.0
ViGoR-Bench: How Far Are Visual Generative Models From Zero-Shot Visual Reasoners? (arXiv:2603.25823v1)1▇ 1%CC-BY-4.0
PaintBench: Deterministic Evaluation of Precise Visual Editing (arXiv:2606.00188v1)1▇ 1%CC-BY-4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 44.3

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json