whatmodel.sh / Command R Plus (08-2024)
Command R Plus (08-2024)
↗ share
+ contribute
Command R Plus (08-2024) is an open-weights language model from Cohere, released August 2024. Its published size is 104B parameters and a 128k-token context window. Licence: cc-by-nc-4.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Arena entry 'command-r-plus-08-2024' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'command-r-plus-08-2024' as 'Command R+ (08-2024)' (Cohere, CC-BY-NC-4.0), linking https://docs.cohere.com/docs/command-r-plus#model-details. Maker repo CohereLabs/c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 @e808c1a: licence tag cc-by-nc-4.0. 103,810,674,688 parameters from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata (dense, so active = total). Released 2024-08: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2024-08-21). Cohere models page lists command-r-plus-08-2024 as Live.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Command R Plus (08-2024), out of 828 with a score, then more from Cohere.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 469 | 47±1 | local | |||
| 470 | 47±1 | local | |||
| 471 | 47±1 | api $4.38/M +local | |||
| 472 | 47±2 | local | |||
| 473 | 47±3 | local | |||
| more from Cohere | |||||
| 76 | 71±6 | api price unknown | |||
| 175 | 64±1 | api price unknown +local | |||
| 277 | 57±1 | api $4.38/M +local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #265 of 300 * · 6.0% of its score · 1 test
Beats Magistral Small 1.0 (2506), Llama 4 Scout (109B-A17B), Bielik 11B v2.3 Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen2.5 1.5B Instruct, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Granite 4.0 1B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified lab | 17.0% ✎ | ▃···▃·▃·▃█·▃ beats 2/7 | 6.0% |
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #327 of 458 · 37% of its score · 6 tests
Beats GLM-4.7-Flash, Qwen3-VL 4B Instruct, LFM2.5 2.6B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct (Apr 2024), DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat, WizardLM 70B V1.0 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider code editing (133 Exercism Python exercises, two attempts) | 38.3% ✎ | ▁·▁▂▄▁▆▄█▆▂▂ beats 10/62 | 16% |
| SWE-bench Verified lab | 17.0% ✎ | ▃···▃·▃·▃█·▃ beats 2/7 | 6.0% |
| MBPP+ lab | 78.8% ✎ | ██·██···████ beats 2/7 | 4.9% |
| LiveCodeBench v5 (Oct 2024–Feb 2025) lab | 14.4% ✎ | ▄▄·▄·····█▄█ beats 2/7 | 4.3% |
| Aider polyglot (225 exercises, two attempts) lab | 2.2% ✎ | █▄··█·█····▄ beats 1/7 | 3.0% |
| BIRD-SQL (dev) lab | 52.7% ✎ | ▄··▄·▄·█··▄█ beats 3/7 | 3.0% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #249 of 393 * · 8.1% of its score · 1 test
Beats Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Flan-T5 XXL, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Granite 4.0 1B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena (text) | 1276.3 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 108/379 | 8.1% |
other tests9 not in a task · 55% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench 2024-07-26 | 34.5% ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▂▃▂█▆▃▅▃ beats 36/61 | 33% |
| RepoQA (32K, threshold 0.8) lab | 77.0% ✎ | ▄▄▄··▄▄··▄·█ beats 2/7 | 7.4% |
| BigCodeBench (Instruct) lab | 25.8% ✎ | ▄··▄▄···▄▄█▄ beats 0/7 | 3.6% |
| Open Persian LLM Leaderboard v2 average (21 tasks) | 63.0% ✎ | ▂▄▂▃█▄▃▆▃▅▂▂ beats 60/81 | 3.5% |
| RULER 128k +1 | 64.6% ✎ | ▄··▂▄▂▆██▄▄▂ beats 7/21 | 2.8% |
| LongBench v2 lab | 27.8% ✎ | ▂·▃·▂▂▁▃▄▁█▄ beats 2/28 | 2.1% |
| RULER 64k | 85.4% ✎ | ▁▁·▁·▂▃▄█▂·▁ beats 16/22 | 1.9% |
| Vectara hallucination leaderboard, 2025 dataset (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate) | 94.6% ✎ | ▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 56/140 | 0.6% |
1 more test
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vectara hallucination leaderboard (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate) | 93.1% ✎ | ▁▂▁▂▅█▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 72/98 | 0.0% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · $4.38/M · $2.5 in / $10 out per 1M tokens · 128k context · docs.cohere.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per 1M text tokens, standard input and output (LiteLLM @c19ce71 row 'command-r-plus-08-2024', litellm_provider cohere_chat). Product: Cohere Chat API. API model: command-r-plus-08-2024 (Cohere models page: Live). Currency: USD.
llama.cpp · recommended
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Command R Plus (08-2024) · needs ~62.8 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-communitychat in the terminal
llama cli -hf lmstudio-community/c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf lmstudio-community/c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Command R Plus (08-2024) · needs ~62.8 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-community
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Command R Plus (08-2024) · needs ~62.9 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run command-r-plus:104b-08-2024-q4_K_M
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Command R Plus (08-2024) · needs ~58.4 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/mlx-communitychat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024-4bit
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/CohereLabs ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Cohere — Command A technical… 36%, LiveBench model judgments (HF… 33%, Aider code editing benchmark… 16% and 4 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 36% | |
| 1 | 33% | |
| 1 | 16% | |
| 1 | 8% | |
| 1 | 4% | |
| 2 | 3% | |
| 2 | 1% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 47.2 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json