whatmodel.sh / Magistral Small 1.0 (2506)
Magistral Small 1.0 (2506)
↗ share
+ contribute
Magistral Small 1.0 (2506) is an open-weights language model from Mistral, released June 2025. Its published size is 23.57B parameters and a 128k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Comparison model from the Epoch AI internal-evaluation CSVs (Epoch release date 2025-06-10). Magistral Small 1.0 (version 25.06; API id retired 11/30/2025); distinct from magistral-small-2509 (1.2). 23,572,403,200 parameters.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Magistral Small 1.0 (2506), out of 828 with a score, then more from Mistral.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 310 | 55±1 | local | |||
| 311 | 55±1 | local | |||
| 312 | 55±1 | local | |||
| 313 | 55±1 | api $0.35/M +local | |||
| 314 | 55±2 | local | |||
| more from Mistral | |||||
| 79 | 71±2 | api $2.06/M | |||
| 174 | 65±1 | api $3.00/M +local | |||
| 180 | 64±2 | comparison only | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #276 of 300 * · 2.3% of its score · 1 test
Trails Granite 4.0 H 350M, Qwen3 0.6B, Qwen2.5 1.5B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 (action completion) | 16.0% ✎ | ▅▃·▃▃▅▅█▃█▅▅ beats 1/19 | 2.3% |
coding██········██ #4 of 4 * · 6.7% of its score · 1 test
Trails Magistral Small 1.1 (2507) here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench v5 (window unspecified) lab | 55.8% ✎ | ▄█▄······▄·▄ beats 0/5 | 6.7% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #198 of 398 · 45% of its score · 3 tests
Beats MiniMax-M2.1, Qwen3 235B-A22B (Apr 2025, hybrid), DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Phi-4-mini-reasoning 3.8B, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B, OpenThinker2 7B here, though they rank lower overall.
other tests2 not in a task · 46% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond +1 | 56.1% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 80/208 | 39% |
| BRIDGE clinical text, zero-shot average (87 tasks) | 37.6% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃▄▆█▃ beats 58/97 | 6.5% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Magistral Small 1.0 (2506) · needs ~14.3 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowskichat in the terminal
llama cli -hf bartowski/mistralai_Magistral-Small-2506-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf bartowski/mistralai_Magistral-Small-2506-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Magistral Small 1.0 (2506) · needs ~14.3 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowski
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/bartowski/mistralai_Magistral-Small-2506-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Magistral Small 1.0 (2506) · needs ~14.64 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run magistral:24b-small-2506-q4_K_M
MLX (Mac)
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Magistral Small 1.0 (2506) · needs ~13.3 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-communitychat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Magistral-Small-2506-MLX-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model lmstudio-community/Magistral-Small-2506-MLX-4bit
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/mistralai ↗
$ how the score was worked out · mistralai/Magistral-Small-250… 62%, Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 29%, BRIDGE Medical Leaderboard (H… 7% and 1 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 62% | |
| 2 | 29% | |
| 1 | 7% | |
| 1 | 2% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 55.2 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json