whatmodel.sh / Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
↗ share
+ contribute
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is an open-weights language model from Alibaba, released November 2024. Its published size is 32.8B parameters and a 131k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, out of 828 with a score, then more from Alibaba.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 284 | 57±1 | api $0.42/M +local | |||
| 285 | 57±1 | comparison only | |||
| 286 | 57±1 | api $0.74/M +local | |||
| 287 | 57±1 | local | |||
| 288 | 56±1 | comparison only | |||
| more from Alibaba | |||||
| 18 | 78±1 | api $3.00/M +local | |||
| 34 | 76±1 | api $3.00/M | |||
| 37 | 75±1 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #184 of 458 · 88% of its score · 17 tests
Beats Gemini 2.5 Flash, Qwen3.5 4B, Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, OpenThinker 32B, Command A Reasoning (08-2025) here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval +1 | 92.1% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▃▄▆▅█▃▃▁ beats 97/99 | 19% |
| HumanEval+ +1 | 87.2% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▁▃▄▄▄█▃▃ beats 97/99 | 18% |
| LiveCodeBench official (Jan 1–Nov 1, 2024) | 41.6% ✎ | ▁▁·▁▂▄▆█▅▂·▂ beats 25/31 | 12% |
| Aider polyglot (225 exercises, two attempts) | 16.4% ✎ | ▂·▂▃▅▂▃█▆▄▂▂ beats 7/49 | 10% |
| Aider code editing (133 Exercism Python exercises, two attempts) | 71.4% ✎ | ▁·▁▂▄▁▆▄█▆▂▂ beats 51/62 | 7.0% |
| MBPP+ +1 | 77.0% ✎ | ▁···▁▁▂▅▇█▆▃ beats 73/75 | 5.9% |
| Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpedo Software) | 24.5% ✎ | ▁▁▁▃·▁▂▃▅▃█▇ beats 5/49 | 3.3% |
| WebApp1K-Duo-React pass@1 (onekq-ai) | 41.6% ✎ | ▁··▁·▁▃▁▆█▇█ beats 4/45 | 2.3% |
9 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| MBPP lab | 90.2% ✎ | █···███·██·█ beats 6/6 | 2.3% |
| MultiPL-E lab | 79.4% ✎ | ▄·▄····▄▄·▄█ beats 5/6 | 2.1% |
| WebApp1K-React pass@1 (onekq-ai) | 66.8% ✎ | ▃▁▁█▁▄▅▃▄▇▁▄ beats 16/31 | 1.8% |
| CodeReviewQA: change localisation (hard), invariant accuracy | 64.3% ✎ | █▂▁▁▂▂▂▃▅▅▅▇ beats 43/47 | 1.5% |
| CRUXEval-I lab | 75.2% ✎ | █·██·█··█·██ beats 6/6 | 1.1% |
| CodeReviewQA: automated code refinement, exact match rate | 44.1% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▃█▅▄ beats 41/47 | 1.0% |
| CodeReviewQA: solution identification (hard), invariant accuracy | 85.7% ✎ | ▃··▁▂▂▃▂█▃▄▃ beats 45/47 | 1.0% |
| CRUXEval-O lab | 83.4% ✎ | ▄·█··▄·▄··▄▄ beats 6/6 | 0.4% |
| CodeReviewQA: change type recognition, invariant accuracy | 79.1% ✎ | ▁▁▁······▁▃█ beats 46/47 | 0.0% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #253 of 393 * · 4.3% of its score · 1 test
Beats Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Flan-T5 XXL, Granite 4.0 H 1B, Granite 4.0 1B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena (text) | 1270.6 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 103/379 | 4.3% |
other tests4 not in a task · 7.6% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSEffi-Bench Pass (1,000 data-science tasks, greedy) | 34.1% ✎ | ▅··▃▅·█·▃██▃ beats 4/15 | 2.8% |
| RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (Torpedo Software) | 84.6% ✎ | ▁▁▃▁█▄▃▃▆▂▂▂ beats 5/49 | 2.4% |
| BigCodeBench (Instruct) lab | 49.6% ✎ | ▄······▄▄█·█ beats 6/6 | 1.6% |
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 74.7% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 222/276 | 0.8% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · Cloudflare · $0.74/M · $0.66 in / $1 out per 1M tokens · 131k context · developers.cloudflare.com ↗ · price sourceWorkers AI published marginal USD per 1M tokens after free allocation. Workers plan fees excluded; billed in Neurons. Published USD rates are rounded. Product: Workers AI. API model: @cf/qwen/qwen2.5-coder-32b-instruct. Settings: plan=Workers Paid, free allocation=excluded, billing=published marginal USD rates; service bills Neurons. Currency: USD.
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct · needs ~19.9 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-communitychat in the terminal
llama cli -hf lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct · needs ~19.9 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-community
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct · needs ~20.18 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run qwen2.5-coder:32b
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct · needs ~18.4 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-communitychat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-MLX-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-MLX-4bit
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/Qwen ↗
$ how the score was worked out · EvalPlus / EvalPerf published… 34%, Qwen (Alibaba) vendor-reporte… 16%, LiveCodeBench official websit… 12% and 8 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json