whatmodel.sh / Seed 2.1 Pro (Preview)

Seed 2.1 Pro (Preview) is a closed-weights language model from ByteDance Seed, released June 2026.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'seed-2.1-pro-preview' (webdev). Released 2026-06: ByteDance Seed blog referencing 'Seed2.1 Preview' on Code Arena (June 2026); Seed 2.1 released 2026-06-23. ByteDance publicly named a 'Seed2.1 Preview' evaluated on Code Arena (frontend), matching this webdev entry first listed 2026-06-16, a week before the official Seed 2.1 release; not asserted to equal the released doubao-seed-2-1-pro checkpoints.

73.6±2.5comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Seed 2.1 Pro (Preview), out of 1132 with a score, then more from ByteDance Seed.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
58Gemini 3.6 Flash Google74±1api $1.50/M2026-07
59GLM-5.2 Z.ai74±1api $2.15/M +local~121GB2026-06
60Seed 2.1 Pro (Preview) ByteDance Seed74±3comparison only2026-06
61Dola Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance74±2comparison only
62Qwen3.7 Max Preview Alibaba74±3comparison only
more from ByteDance Seed
66Seed2.0 Lite ByteDance Seed73±4comparison only
235Seed-OSS 36B Instruct ByteDance Seed63±1local~23GB2025-08

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▂▁ #48 of 549 * · 97% of its score · 1 test

Beats GPT-5.4, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp), Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Mistral Large 4 (public preview), Claude Sonnet 4.6, Qwen3.8 27B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)1516.9 ✎▁▂▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 75/119avg 981▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 97%sharp

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 97%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 97%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 3%
weighted average= 73.6

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json