whatmodel.sh / Dola Seed 2.0 Pro
Dola Seed 2.0 Pro
↗ share
+ contribute
Dola Seed 2.0 Pro is a closed-weights language model from ByteDance. Licence: proprietary.
Catalogue identity notes
Exact Arena entry 'dola-seed-2.0-pro' in the October 2026 pinned dataset. Comparison identity; no public run route inferred from leaderboard inclusion.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Dola Seed 2.0 Pro, out of 828 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 56 | 74±1 | api $1.50/M | |
| 57 | 74±1 | api $2.15/M +local | |
| 58 | 74±2 | comparison only | |
| 59 | 73±1 | api $1.60/M +local | |
| 60 | 73±2 | api $1.56/M |
$ what it's good at
agent tasks······█····· #1 of 1 * · 33% of its score · 1 test
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Telecom lab | 94.2% ✎ | ▁·▅█▆▅▂▃▃▂▃▁ beats 73/89 | 33% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #49 of 463 * · 38% of its score · 1 test
Beats MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B), GPT-6 Luna, GPT-5.6 Luna here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Claude Sonnet 4.5, MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B), GLM-5 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena (text) | 1456.5 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 326/379 | 38% |
vision & documents▁▁▃▃▂▃▅▄▇▇█▃ #45 of 182 * · 26% of its score · 1 test
Beats MiMo-V2.6-Pro, MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B), DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, Qwen3.6 Plus here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena vision (style controlled) | 1256.6 ✎ | ▁▁▂▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 107/145 | 26% |
$ where to run it
No verified API or download recorded yet · add one
$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 65%, ByteDance Seed - Seed2.0 Mode… 33%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 65% | |
| 1 | 33% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 2% | |
| weighted average | = 73.6 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json