whatmodel.sh / Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (0309)

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (0309) is a closed-weights language model from SpaceXAI (xAI), released March 2026.

Catalogue identity notes

Arena entry 'grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309' (text, vision, search). Released 2026-03: xAI API release notes, March 2026: 'Grok 4.20 and Grok 4.20 Multi-agent are live'. xAI model page 'Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta': model name grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309, aliases include grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309 (the Arena entry name). A multi-agent system served as one API model; distinct from grok-4-20 (grok-4.20-0309-reasoning).

73.1±2.3#56 of 719 LLMsfrom 3 benchmark results across 1 source

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (0309), out of 828 with a score, then more from SpaceXAI (xAI).

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
58Dola Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance74±2comparison only
59Qwen3.8 27B Alibaba73±1api $1.60/M +local~18GB2026-08
60Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (0309) SpaceXAI (xAI)73±2api $1.56/M2026-03
61Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI73±1api $1.71/M +local~317GB2026-04
62GPT-5 Pro OpenAI73±1api $41.25/M2025-10
more from SpaceXAI (xAI)
30Grok 4.6 SpaceXAI (xAI)77±1api $3.00/M2026-08
42Grok 4.5 SpaceXAI (xAI)75±1api $3.00/M2026-07
47Grok 4.7 SpaceXAI (xAI)75±1api $3.00/M2026-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #33 of 393 * · 47% of its score · 1 test

Beats Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Terra here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), Claude Opus 4.5, Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1470.6 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 341/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 47%blunt
vision & documents▁▁▃▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█▄ #45 of 147 * · 32% of its score · 1 test

Beats MiMo-V2.6-Pro, MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B), DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, Kimi K2.5 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena vision (style controlled)1250.3 ✎▁▁▂▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 102/145avg 1068▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 32%blunt
web search▂▁▂▆▄█▃▃▁▁·▁ #25 of 80 * · 19% of its score · 1 test

Beats Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Haiku 5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18), Mistral Small 3.1 24B (2503), GPT-4o (2024-08-06) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena search systems (style controlled)1204.9 ✎▁·▁▁▂▂▂█▅▂▁▁ beats 24/30avg 1055▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 19%blunt

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · xAI · $1.56/M · $1.25 in / $2.5 out per 1M tokens · 1M context · docs.x.ai ↗ · price sourceUSD per 1M tokens, xAI API text pricing table, grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309 (< 200k prompt tokens): input $1.25, output $2.50; cached input $0.20 and the ≥200k long-context tier ($2.50/$5.00) excluded. Currency: USD. xAI official models and pricing page, observed 2026-09-28.

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 98%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset3▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 98%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 2%
weighted average= 73.1

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json