whatmodel.sh / Qwen2.5-Max (2025-01-25)

Qwen2.5-Max (2025-01-25) is a closed-weights language model from Alibaba, released January 2025. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison model from the Epoch AI internal-evaluation CSVs (Epoch release date 2025-01-25). Dated API snapshot qwen-max-2025-01-25 (Epoch display 'Qwen2.5-Max'). Not listed on Model Studio's text-generation or pricing pages (observed 2026-09-28), so api is null. Distinct from arena's 'qwen-max-0919'.

57.1±1.1comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 6 benchmark results across 4 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Qwen2.5-Max (2025-01-25), out of 828 with a score, then more from Alibaba.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
278GPT-4o (2024-11-20) OpenAI57±1api $4.38/M2024-11
279Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google57±2api $0.17/M2025-07
280Qwen2.5-Max (2025-01-25) Alibaba57±1comparison only2025-01
281Qwen2.5-Omni 7B Alibaba57±2local~6.4GB2025-03
282GPT-4o (2024-05-13) OpenAI57±0api $7.50/M2024-05
more from Alibaba
18Qwen3.8 Max (2.4T-A95B) Alibaba78±1api $3.00/M +local~380GB2026-08
34Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Alibaba76±1api $3.00/M2026-09
37Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Alibaba75±1local~59GB2026-08

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #249 of 524 * · 31% of its score · 2 tests

Beats Qwen3.5 4B, Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct, Solar Open 100B (102B-A12B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, Ministral 3 3B Reasoning 2512, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Instruct (0724) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Aider polyglot (225 exercises, two attempts)21.8% ✎▂·▂▃▅▂▃█▆▄▂▂ beats 12/49very hard · avg 8.5%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 27%sharp · at its level
WebApp1K-React pass@1 (onekq-ai)57.6% ✎▃▁▁█▁▄▅▃▄▇▁▄ beats 14/31medium · avg 44%▇▇ 4.7%sharp · at its level · noisy
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #158 of 463 * · 12% of its score · 1 test

Beats o3-mini, EXAONE 4.5 33B, INTELLECT-3 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 8B-A1B, LFM2.5 2.6B, Spark-X2.5 1.7B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1373.8 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 214/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇ 12%blunt
math▁▂▃▅▇▅▅█▄▁▁▁ #241 of 462 * · 36% of its score · 2 tests

Beats DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24), GPT-4o (2024-08-06), Command A (03-2025) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Olmo 3 7B Instruct, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B, Phi-4-mini-reasoning 3.8B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
MATH level 567.2% ✎▂▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅▂▃▄ beats 58/92hard · avg 32%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 26%sharp · at its level
OTIS mock AIME 2024–202516.1% ✎▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 54/193very hard · avg 8.5%▇▇▇▇ 10%sharp · at its level · noisy
other tests1 not in a task · 20% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA Diamond56.1% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 82/208hard · avg 40%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 20%sharp · at its level

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 57%, Aider polyglot benchmark runs 27%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 12% and 1 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Epoch AI — internal evaluations3▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 57%CC BY 4.0
Aider polyglot benchmark runs1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 27%Apache-2.0
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇ 12%CC BY 4.0
WebApp1K models leaderboard (onekq-ai)1▇ 5%MIT
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 57.1

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json