whatmodel.sh / image / FLUX.1 [schnell]

FLUX.1 [schnell] is an open-weights image model from Black Forest Labs, released August 2024. Its published size is 12B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.

41.6±2.3#100 of 144 image modelsfrom 4 benchmark results across 4 sources

Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The image models ranked either side of FLUX.1 [schnell], out of 197 with a score, then more from Black Forest Labs.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
133BAGEL ByteDance Seed42±1api $0.10/image +local~12GB2025-05
134Midjourney V6.1 Midjourney42±4comparison only2024-07
135FLUX.1 [schnell] Black Forest Labs42±2api $0.0030/image +local~7.7GB2024-08
136OmniGen2 BAAI42±2api $0.15/image +local~17GB2025-06
137Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Stability AI42±1api $0.065/image +local~5.4GB2024-10
more from Black Forest Labs
32FLUX.2 [max] Black Forest Labs64±1api $0.070/image2025-12
36FLUX.2 [pro] Black Forest Labs63±2api $0.030/image2025-11
37FLUX.2 [flex] Black Forest Labs62±2api $0.050/image2025-11

see all image models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #83 of 126 * · 59% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Latent Diffusion text2img-large (LDM-KL-8-G, LAION-400M), VQ-Diffusion (ITHQ), FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Playground v2 (1024px aesthetic) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
T2I-ReasonBench (overall)57.6% ✎▅▂█▃▂▂····▂▂ beats 9/13easy · avg 69%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 48%at its level
WISE (WiScore overall, GPT-4o judge)40.0% ✎▄·▆▂▆█▄▆▂▄·▄ beats 7/22medium · avg 60%▇▇▇▇▇ 11%at its level
GenEval67.7% ✎▇▃▅▇▁▄▅▃█▃▃▅ beats 18/39easy · avg 79%—not counted yet: no other model in the same run to compare it with
other tests2 not in a task · 39% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Rapidata human-face generation alignment (Elo)885.1 ✎▃··▅▃··▃▃··█ beats 0/8avg 1012▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 21%typical
VVRBench accuracy (10,000 verifiable synthetic-scene tasks)2.9% ✎▃·█▅▃·▅▃···▃ beats 3/10very hard · avg 7.6%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 18%sharp · too hard for it

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · Replicate · $0.0030/image · replicate.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per output image. Text-to-image; one output image, standard FLUX.1 schnell endpoint. Replicate output/character billing; hardware-time rates are not added to this tariff. Taxes and separate services excluded. Bertrande, https://bertrande.com/en/ai/replicate/black-forest-labs--flux-schnell; observed 2026-09-20T01:44:15Z. CC BY 4.0; units normalized and model identifier mapped.

Other ways to run it

version

  1. Run it as published · needs ~7.7 GB, Mac only · from modelfit.io
    uvx --from mflux mflux-generate --model schnell --prompt "a cat holding a sign" --steps 2 -q 4

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/black-forest-labs ↗

$ how the score was worked out · T2I-ReasonBench: Benchmarking… 48%, Rapidata/Face_Generation_Benc… 21%, Verifiable Visual Rewards Tra… 18% and 1 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

not counted (1)

Breaking the Accuracy-Speed Barrier: How MXFP4/6 Quantization Revolutionizes Image and Video GenerationGenEval [correct]67.7%fewer than three models have this test yet, or this source ran it for this model alone

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json