whatmodel.sh / image / Playground v2 (1024px aesthetic)
Playground v2 (1024px aesthetic)
↗ share
+ contribute
Playground v2 (1024px aesthetic) is an open-weights image model from Playground, released December 2023. Its published size is 2.57B parameters. Licence: playground-v2-community.
Catalogue identity notes
playgroundai/playground-v2-1024px-aesthetic. No parameter count on the card; memory estimated as for SDXL 1.0 (same SDXL-architecture UNet).
Model information sources
UNet only: HF Hub safetensors total for the official repo (pinned revision), 2,567,463,684 = unet/diffusion_pytorch_model.safetensors (SDXL-architecture UNet). The two CLIP text encoders and the VAE are not included. Observed 2026-10-07.
Score within the LMArena text-to-image comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The image models ranked either side of Playground v2 (1024px aesthetic), out of 197 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 137 | 42±1 | api $0.065/image +local | |
| 138 | 42±3 | local | |
| 139 | 41±4 | local | |
| 140 | 41±2 | local | |
| 141 | 41±3 | api $0.035/image +local |
$ what it's good at
text to image▂▅▅▃▄▄█▃▁▂▁▁ #81 of 126 * · 95% of its score · 1 test
Beats Latent Diffusion text2img-large (LDM-KL-8-G, LAION-400M), VQ-Diffusion (ITHQ), FLUX.1 Kontext [dev] here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GenAI-Arena text-to-image (Elo, 4 Jun 2024) | 1101.0 ✎ | ▃▃··▃·▃·█·▃▃ beats 7/8 | 95% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
version
- Run it as published · needs ~8.9 GB, NVIDIA only · from huggingface.co/playgroundai (official)
uv run --with diffusers --with transformers --with accelerate --with torch python -c "import torch; from diffusers import DiffusionPipeline; p=DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained('playgroundai/playground-v2-1024px-aesthetic', torch_dtype=torch.float16, use_safetensors=True, add_watermarker=False, variant='fp16').to('cuda'); p(prompt='a cat holding a sign', guidance_scale=3.0).images[0].save('out.png')"
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/playgroundai ↗
$ how the score was worked out · GenAI Arena: An Open Evaluati… 95%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 95% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 5% | |
| weighted average | = 41.2 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json