whatmodel.sh / Command A Reasoning (08-2025)
Command A Reasoning (08-2025)
↗ share
+ contribute
Command A Reasoning (08-2025) is an open-weights language model from Cohere.
Catalogue identity notes
HF repo sha bd39aafe2c5e71a044d2f1674accfd9b384d3dbb, cc-by-nc-4.0, created 2025-08-12; 111B per the Cohere post's comparison table.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Command A Reasoning (08-2025), out of 828 with a score, then more from Cohere.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 322 | 55±1 | api $2.40/M +local | |||
| 323 | 55±1 | local | |||
| 324 | 55±2 | local | |||
| 325 | 55±2 | local | |||
| 326 | 55±2 | local | |||
| more from Cohere | |||||
| 76 | 71±6 | api price unknown | |||
| 175 | 64±1 | api price unknown +local | |||
| 277 | 57±1 | api $4.38/M +local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #148 of 300 · 58% of its score · 3 tests
Beats o4-mini, o1 (2024-12-17), o3-mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Mini, Jamba 1.5 Large here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Telecom lab | 37.0% ✎ | ▁·▅█▆▅▂▃▃▂▃▁ beats 30/89 | 27% |
| BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive) | 57.1% ✎ | ▁▁▁▂██▅▅▆▂▂▂ beats 68/77 | 18% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard lab | 3.0% ✎ | ▂▅▆▂▂▆▂▂█▅▅▂ beats 4/27 | 12% |
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #183 of 458 * · 8.9% of its score · 1 test
Beats Gemini 2.5 Flash, Qwen3.5 4B, Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, OpenThinker 32B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| SciCode (level unspecified) lab | 30.0% ✎ | ▁····▃▄▄▄█▆▂ beats 10/34 | 8.9% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #209 of 398 * · 25% of its score · 1 test
Beats DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24), GPT-4o (2024-08-06), Command A (03-2025) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Olmo 3 7B Instruct, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B, Phi-4-mini-reasoning 3.8B here, though they rank lower overall.
other tests1 not in a task · 6.7% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench prompt-level (loose) lab | 36.0% ✎ | ▃········██▅ beats 0/8 | 6.7% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Command A Reasoning (08-2025) · needs ~67.1 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowskichat in the terminal
llama cli -hf bartowski/CohereLabs_command-a-reasoning-08-2025-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf bartowski/CohereLabs_command-a-reasoning-08-2025-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Command A Reasoning (08-2025) · needs ~67.1 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowski
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/bartowski/CohereLabs_command-a-reasoning-08-2025-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Command A Reasoning (08-2025) · needs ~30.5 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowskichat in the terminal
ollama run hf.co/bartowski/CohereLabs_command-a-reasoning-08-2025-GGUF:IQ2_XXS
MLX (Mac)
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Command A Reasoning (08-2025) · needs ~118 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/mlx-communitychat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/command-a-reasoning-08-2025-8bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/command-a-reasoning-08-2025-8bit
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/CohereLabs ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Cohere vendor-reported benchm… 80%, Berkeley Function Calling Lea… 18%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 80% | |
| 1 | 18% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 2% | |
| weighted average | = 54.8 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json