whatmodel.sh / Claude Sonnet 4

Claude Sonnet 4 is a closed-weights language model from Anthropic, released May 2025. Licence: proprietary.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison model from the Epoch AI internal-evaluation CSVs (Epoch release date 2025-05-22). Dated API snapshot claude-sonnet-4-20250514; distinct from Sonnet 4.5/4.6. Thinking budgets recorded per result. Anthropic model deprecations page: retired June 15, 2026.

65.3±0.6comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 48 benchmark results across 18 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Claude Sonnet 4, out of 828 with a score, then more from Anthropic.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
158o3-mini OpenAI65±1api $1.93/M2025-01
159Claude 3.7 Sonnet Anthropic65±1comparison only2025-02
160Claude Sonnet 4 Anthropic65±1comparison only2025-05
161MiMo-V2.6-Distill-Qwen-9B Xiaomi65±2local~7.8GB2026-09
162K-EXAONE (236B-A23B) LG AI Research65±1local~152GB2025-12
more from Anthropic
2Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic87±1api $8.00/M2026-09
4Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic85±1api $20.00/M2026-09
5Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic84±1api $4.00/M2026-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▂▆█▆▅▄▄▃▂▁ #145 of 340 · 22% of its score · 11 tests

Beats o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Large, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
τ²-bench Telecom +146.2% ✎██··███···██ beats 4/6very hard · avg 9.5%▇▇ 5.5%sharp · at its level · several runs
BrowserGym WorkArena-L2 (AgentLab GenericAgent)40.4% ✎▃▅▃·▅▃▃··█·▃ beats 9/11very hard · avg 3.9%▇ 2.7%sharp · at its level · noisy
τ-bench Retail lab80.5% ✎▁····▃·▂▇█▂▆ beats 26/28medium · avg 44%▇ 2.4%small run
BrowserGym WorkArena-L1 (AgentLab GenericAgent)63.3% ✎█···█▄▄·▄█·█ beats 10/10hard · avg 29%▇ 2.1%at its level
τ²-bench Retail80.0% ✎▅···█·▃····▃ beats 6/6medium · avg 41%▇ 2.0%at its level
τ-bench Airline lab60.0% ✎▁▁▁·▅▄▁█▇▁▁▇ beats 25/28hard · avg 26%▇ 1.5%at its level · small run
τ²-bench Airline60.0% ✎▄·▄··▄···█▄▄ beats 6/6hard · avg 26%▇ 1.3%at its level
BFCL V4 (2025-08-26 archive, models absent from later archives)70.3% ✎▄▄····█▄···▄ beats 5/5hard · avg 27%▇ 1.3%at its level
3 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BrowserGym MiniWoB (AgentLab GenericAgent)70.7% ✎▅····▅▅▃▃·▃█ beats 9/11medium · avg 55%▇ 1.1%blunt · at its level
Terminal-Bench (pre-2.0 release)40.7% ✎▄·▄···▄▄···█ beats 5/5very hard · avg 12%▇ 0.9%at its level
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 (action completion)55.0% ✎▅▃·▃▃▅▅█▃█▅▅ beats 16/19hard · avg 27%▇ 0.7%at its level
coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #140 of 524 · 22% of its score · 6 tests

Beats Qwen3.5 Plus, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Seed-OSS 36B Instruct, Gemma 4 26B-A4B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Aider polyglot (225 exercises, two attempts)61.3% ✎▂·▂▃▅▂▃█▆▄▂▂ beats 36/49very hard · avg 8.5%▇▇▇▇ 10%sharp · at its level
Luau Leetcode fully solved (Torpedo Software)68.3% ✎▁▁▁▁·▁▂▃▅▃█▇ beats 20/49hard · avg 18%▇ 3.1%at its level
LiveCodeBench (version unspecified)45.6% ✎█·······▄▄▄▄ beats 2/5hard · avg 21%▇ 2.9%at its level
LiveCodeBench official (Aug 1, 2024–May 1, 2025)55.9% ✎▃▃▅▃··▃▅█▅▅▃ beats 5/15hard · avg 25%▇ 2.7%at its level
MBPP+80.2% ✎▃·····▃█▃··▃ beats 5/6medium · avg 61%▇ 1.9%typical
HumanEval+94.5% ✎▄▄▄·····▄▄·█ beats 5/6easy · avg 67%▇ 1.8%sharp · maxed out
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #127 of 463 * · 5.0% of its score · 2 tests

Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B), GPT-5 mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Nemotron-Cascade-8B, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Mistral Large 3 (675B-A41B) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1401.6 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 247/379avg 1268▇ 3.5%blunt
IFEval (aggregation unspecified)88.3% ✎█··█·█··████ beats 3/6easy · avg 75%▇ 1.4%typical
math▁▂▃▅▇▅▅█▄▁▁▁ #195 of 462 · 9.4% of its score · 5 tests

Beats MiniMax-M2.1 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails OpenThinker3 7B, Olmo 3 7B Think, OpenThinker2 32B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
OTIS mock AIME 2024–202568.9% ✎▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 99/193very hard · avg 8.5%▇ 3.0%sharp · at its level · noisy
MATH level 584.4% ✎▂▂▅▆▄█▆▃▅▂▃▄ beats 71/92hard · avg 32%▇ 3.0%sharp
AIME 202537.0% ✎▄▄···▄▄··▄·█ beats 1/6hard · avg 19%▇ 1.7%sharp · at its level · noisy
AIME 202447.0% ✎▁▁▁▂▁▃▁▅███▃ beats 20/85hard · avg 32%▇ 0.9%sharp · noisy
MATH-50093.8% ✎▄·▄··█··▄·▄▄ beats 1/6very easy · avg 86%▇ 0.8%maxed out · noisy
vision & documents▁▁▃▃▂▃▅▄▇▇█▃ #82 of 182 * · 2.4% of its score · 1 test

Beats DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp), GPT-5.4 nano, GPT-5 mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 4 12B, Qwen3.5 9B, Gemma 4 26B-A4B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena vision (style controlled)1206.2 ✎▁▁▂▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 74/145avg 1068▇ 2.4%blunt
other tests21 not in a task · 39% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GPQA Diamond +179.2% ✎▁▁▁▁▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 125/208hard · avg 40%▇▇▇▇ 9.4%sharp · at its level · several runs
MMLU91.8% ✎▄·····█▄▄▄·▄ beats 6/6medium · avg 71%▇ 3.7%typical
MMLU-Pro83.7% ✎█▄·▄···▄··▄▄ beats 4/6medium · avg 59%▇ 3.0%typical
KCL-Essay vanilla35.5% ✎▁···▁▃▂█▃▃▃▂ beats 14/23hard · avg 18%▇ 2.7%at its level
EQ-Bench 3 (emotional intelligence, judge Elo)1224.3 ✎▁·▂▁▄▅▅▃█▄▁▁ beats 34/62avg 1044▇ 2.2%typical
CMMLU86.5% ✎█····▄··▄▄▄▄ beats 3/6medium · avg 67%▇ 1.9%typical
AraGen-v3 3C3H score (Inception, Claude Sonnet 4 judge)75.6% ✎▁▁·▁▂▂▄█▄▅▄▄ beats 59/66hard · avg 31%▇ 1.7%at its level
C-Eval86.6% ✎█····▄·▄·▄▄▄ beats 2/6medium · avg 68%▇ 1.7%typical
13 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
VitaBench23.0% ✎█·······▄█·█ beats 5/6very hard · avg 6.4%▇ 1.6%typical
COLLIE (constrained text generation)51.2% ✎▄···▄█▄····█ beats 4/6hard · avg 30%▇ 1.5%at its level
RPC-Bench overall, text input (Z.ai)24.2% ✎▄··▄▄·▄▄█·▄▄ beats 1/8very hard · avg 11%▇ 1.4%at its level
KCL-MCQA vanilla45.7% ✎▂···█▂▆▆██▆▂ beats 15/23very hard · avg 30%▇ 1.4%at its level
RobloxQA v2.0 multiple choice (Torpedo Software)92.3% ✎▁▁▃▁█▄▃▃▆▂▂▂ beats 21/49easy · avg 78%▇ 1.4%typical
DROP73.1% ✎▄···▄·▄█·▄·▄ beats 2/6medium · avg 41%▇ 1.3%noisy
HindiGen-v1 3C3H score (Inception, Claude 3.5 Sonnet judge)69.8% ✎▁▁▁▁·▂·█▆█▇▁ beats 18/31medium · avg 48%▇ 1.3%typical
LongSocialBench (full-context, 4-option MCQ over discussion threads)52.0% ✎▆▂·▄█·▂▂·▄▄▂ beats 14/16very hard · avg 36%▇ 1.2%blunt · at its level
DiagnosticIQ industrial maintenance MCQ (macro accuracy, 4 options)62.5% ✎▁··▃▁▁▁▅█▅▁▅ beats 13/24medium · avg 52%▇ 0.7%blunt · at its level
ZebraLogic75.8% ✎█···█··███·█ beats 1/5medium · avg 53%▇ 0.6%noisy
BeyondAIME20.5% ✎█····█·▄▄··▄ beats 0/6hard · avg 25%▇ 0.5%at its level
Vectara hallucination leaderboard, 2025 dataset (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate)95.5% ✎▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 76/140very easy · avg 94%▇ 0.1%blunt · maxed out · noisy
Vectara hallucination leaderboard (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate)89.7% ✎▁▂▁▂▅█▂▃▄▃▁▁ beats 43/98very easy · avg 90%▇ 0.0%blunt

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · Meituan LongCat-Flash-Chat mo… 37%, Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 12%, Aider polyglot benchmark runs 10% and 15 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Meituan LongCat-Flash-Chat model card (evaluation table)21▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 37%MIT
Epoch AI — internal evaluations3▇▇▇▇ 12%CC BY 4.0
Aider polyglot benchmark runs1▇▇▇ 10%Apache-2.0
LMArena leaderboard dataset2▇▇ 6%CC BY 4.0
ServiceNow BrowserGym leaderboard (AgentLab GenericAgent runs)3▇▇ 6%MIT
Roblox LLM Leaderboard (Torpedo Software): RobloxQA v2.0 and Luau Leetcode2▇ 5%MIT
Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs’ Legal Reasoning Capabilities2▇ 4%CC BY 4.0
τ-bench leaderboard: Anthropic's own submissions · lab-reported2▇ 4%MIT
Moonshot AI Kimi-K2-Instruct model card (instruction-model evaluation table)1▇ 4%Modified MIT License (Kimi K2)
Inception Arabic/Hindi leaderboards (AraGen-v3, HindiGen-v1, Arabic IFEval)2▇ 3%Apache-2.0
LiveCodeBench official website results (2025-08-01)1▇ 3%CC-BY-SA-4.0
EQ-Bench 3 canonical leaderboard results1▇ 2%MIT
RPC-Bench leaderboard (Z.ai research paper comprehension)1▇ 1%Apache-2.0
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard result archive1▇ 1%Apache-2.0
LongSocialBench: Do Long-Context LLMs Understand Online Discussion Threads? (arXiv:2610.04118v1)1▇ 1%CC BY 4.0
Galileo Agent Leaderboard (v1 and v2 results)1▇ 1%Apache-2.0
DiagnosticIQ: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Industrial Maintenance Action Recommendation from Symbolic Rules (arXiv:2605.08614v1)1▇ 1%CC BY 4.0
Vectara hallucination leaderboard (vectara/hallucination-leaderboard repository)2▇ 0%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 0%
weighted average= 65.3

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json