whatmodel.sh / Vicuna 13B v1.1

Vicuna 13B v1.1 is an open-weights language model from LMSYS, released April 2023. Its published size is 13B parameters.

Catalogue identity notes

LMSYS Vicuna 13B v1.1 (LLaMA 13B fine-tuned on ShareGPT), released as delta weights lmsys/vicuna-13b-delta-v1.1 (created 2023-04-12). Not v0 (March 2023) or v1.3/v1.5.

Model information sources

Release date ↗

41.8±2.1comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 5 benchmark results across 3 sources

Score within the LMArena (text) comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Vicuna 13B v1.1, out of 877 with a score, then more from LMSYS.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
636North Micro Vision Instruct (2.4B) Cohere42±2local~3.8GB2026-08
637Deita 7B v1.0 HKUST NLP42±2local~32GB2023-12
638Vicuna 13B v1.1 LMSYS42±2comparison only2023-04
639OpenHermes 2.5 Mistral 7B Nous Research42±1local~5.9GB2023-10
640Code Llama 34B Instruct Meta42±1local~22GB2023-08
more from LMSYS
643Vicuna 33B v1.3 LMSYS41±1local~23GB2023-06
693Vicuna 13B v1.5 LMSYS38±1local~9.8GB2023-08
715Vicuna 13B v1.3 LMSYS37±2local~29GB2023-06

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

other tests5 not in a task · 98% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
CommonsenseQA50.6% ✎█·····▂▂▃▂▄▄ beats 23/38easy · avg 80%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 35%sharp · at its level · small run
ARC Challenge53.2% ✎▄▁▁▂▁▄█▇▃▂▃▂ beats 94/140medium · avg 70%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 25%sharp · at its level · small run
This is not a Dataset (negation), zero-shot accuracy57.8% ✎█▁····▃▁·▃·▁ beats 13/14hard · avg 67%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 15%sharp · noisy
OpenBookQA49.0% ✎▅▁▁▁▂▂▃█▃▁▃▁ beats 67/107medium · avg 55%▇▇▇▇▇▇ 15%small run
SummEdits factual-consistency detection (zero-shot, balanced accuracy)56.1% ✎▄····▄·█···▄ beats 1/4hard · avg 65%▇▇▇ 8.2%noisy

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · Search Augmented Instruction… 75%, This is not a Dataset: A Larg… 15%, SummEdits: Measuring LLM Abil… 8%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json