whatmodel.sh / Vicuna 33B v1.3
Vicuna 33B v1.3
↗ share
+ contribute
Vicuna 33B v1.3 is an open-weights language model from LMSYS, released June 2023. Its published size is 33B parameters and a 2k-token context window. Licence: non-commercial.
Catalogue identity notes
Arena entry 'vicuna-33b' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'vicuna-33b' as 'Vicuna-33B' (LMSYS, Non-commercial), linking https://huggingface.co/lmsys/vicuna-33b-v1.3. Maker repo lmsys/vicuna-33b-v1.3 @ef8d6be: licence tag none tagged. Parameters: nominal size from the model name. Released 2023-06: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2023-06-21). Only one Vicuna 33B checkpoint (v1.3) was released; card licence 'Non-commercial license'. The ollama vicuna 33b tags are the only 33B build in that library.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Vicuna 33B v1.3, out of 828 with a score, then more from LMSYS.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 633 | 39±2 | local | |||
| 634 | 39±1 | local | |||
| 635 | 39±1 | local | |||
| 636 | 39±1 | local | |||
| 637 | 39±1 | local | |||
| more from LMSYS | |||||
| 679 | 36±2 | local | |||
| 716 | 33±1 | local | |||
| 804 | 17±2 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #331 of 393 · 77% of its score · 6 tests
Beats OpenThinker3 7B, Gemma 4 E2B, Code Llama 70B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Granite 4.0 H 350M, LFM2 350M, Gemma 3 1B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled | 17.6% ✎ | ▁▂▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 44/122 | 27% |
| Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judge) | 8.6% ✎ | ▂▁▃▅█▅▄▃▃▅▃▁ beats 4/60 | 15% |
| Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024) | 1105.0 ✎ | ▂▁▂▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 49/95 | 11% |
| LMArena (text) | 1172.9 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 52/379 | 11% |
| MT-Bench (GPT-4 single-answer grading, LMSYS runs) lab | 7.1200 MT-Bench score (1-10) ✎ | ▆▂▂▆▆▄██▃▄▄▆ beats 21/28 | 10% |
| AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-davinci-003, GPT-4 judge) | 89.0% ✎ | ▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 28/45 | 3.6% |
other tests4 not in a task · 23% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factual knowledge recall, Premium2k exact match (zero-shot) | 34.3% ✎ | ▅····▃▅·██·█ beats 11/13 | 9.5% |
| Factual knowledge recall, Premium2k exact match (10-shot) | 44.0% ✎ | ▃▅▃··▅▃·█▃▃▅ beats 10/13 | 6.0% |
| EQ-Bench v1 (60 questions, paper run) | 36.5% ✎ | ▂··▄·▂▆▄▂█·▂ beats 4/14 | 4.9% |
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 65.3% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 115/276 | 2.3% |
$ where to run it
Ollama · recommended
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Vicuna 33B v1.3 · needs ~20.3 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run vicuna:33b-q4_K_M
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/lmsys ↗
$ how the score was worked out · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 30%, Towards a Holistic Evaluation… 15%, Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderbo… 15% and 5 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json