whatmodel.sh / Deita 7B v1.0
Deita 7B v1.0
↗ share
+ contribute
Deita 7B v1.0 is an open-weights language model from HKUST NLP, released December 2023. Its published size is 7.24B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Maker repo hkust-nlp/deita-7b-v1.0 @de16c09: licence tag apache-2.0. 7,241,732,096 parameters from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata (dense, so active = total). Released 2023-12: month the maker's Hugging Face repo was created (createdAt 2023-12-20).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Deita 7B v1.0, out of 828 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 621 | 40±2 | local | |
| 622 | 40±2 | local | |
| 623 | 40±2 | local | |
| 624 | 40±1 | local | |
| 625 | 40±1 | local |
$ what it's good at
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #329 of 393 * · 92% of its score · 2 tests
Beats OpenThinker3 7B, Gemma 4 E2B, Code Llama 70B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2 350M, Gemma 3 1B, Flan-T5 XXL here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled | 16.1% ✎ | ▁▂▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 41/122 | 82% |
| AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-davinci-003, GPT-4 judge) | 90.1% ✎ | ▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█▆▄▂ beats 31/45 | 9.5% |
other tests1 not in a task · 6.8% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 66.3% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▅▁ beats 124/276 | 6.8% |
$ where to run it
Other ways to run it
- Run it as published · needs ~28.97 GB · from huggingface.co/hkust-nlp (official)
uv run --with torch --with 'transformers<5' --with accelerate python -c "from transformers import pipeline; print(pipeline('text-generation', model='hkust-nlp/deita-7b-v1.0', torch_dtype='auto', device_map='auto')('Once upon a time', max_new_tokens=40)[0]['generated_text'])"
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/hkust-nlp ↗
$ how the score was worked out · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 92%, Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboa… 7%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 92% | |
| 1 | 7% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 2% | |
| weighted average | = 40.1 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json