whatmodel.sh / Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker
Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker
↗ share
+ contribute
Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker is an open-weights language model from ServiceNow, released November 2025. Its published size is 14.9B parameters. Licence: mit.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker, out of 828 with a score.
| # | model | score | where |
|---|---|---|---|
| 212 | 62±2 | comparison only | |
| 213 | 62±1 | api $0.75/M +local | |
| 214 | 62±2 | local | |
| 215 | 62±2 | comparison only | |
| 216 | 62±1 | api $0.85/M |
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #195 of 300 · 31% of its score · 3 tests
Beats o1 (2024-12-17), o3-mini, DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Mini, Mellum2 12B-A2.5B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Retail lab | 66.7% ✎ | █▄··▄··▄·▄·▄ beats 3/6 | 13% |
| SWE-bench Verified lab | 23.0% ✎ | █·█▄·······█ beats 1/6 | 10% |
| τ²-bench Airline lab | 58.0% ✎ | ▄▄······▄█▄▄ beats 4/6 | 9.1% |
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #176 of 458 * · 61% of its score · 2 tests
Beats Qwen3.5 9B, Devstral 2 (2512) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, Ministral 3 8B Reasoning 2512, Phi-4-reasoning 14B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot (225 exercises, two attempts) lab | 37.7% ✎ | █▄····▄··█·▄ beats 0/6 | 52% |
| SWE-bench Verified lab | 23.0% ✎ | █·█▄·······█ beats 1/6 | 10% |
vision & documents▁▁▃▂▁▃▄▃▆▇█▄ #89 of 147 * · 11% of its score · 2 tests
Beats DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp), GPT-5 nano here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct, GPT-4.1 mini here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| CharXiv (reasoning questions) lab | 56.0% ✎ | ▄·····▄▄·▄·█ beats 1/5 | 6.6% |
| CharXiv descriptive questions lab | 89.8% ✎ | ▄····▄···█▄▄ beats 2/5 | 4.0% |
other tests1 not in a task · 5.2% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-IF (aggregation unspecified) lab | 83.3% ✎ | ▄·····▄█▄▄·▄ beats 3/6 | 5.2% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker · needs ~9.44 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowskichat in the terminal
llama cli -hf bartowski/ServiceNow-AI_Apriel-1.6-15b-Thinker-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf bartowski/ServiceNow-AI_Apriel-1.6-15b-Thinker-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker · needs ~9.44 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowski
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/bartowski/ServiceNow-AI_Apriel-1.6-15b-Thinker-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker · needs ~9.44 GB · from huggingface.co/bartowskichat in the terminal
ollama run hf.co/bartowski/ServiceNow-AI_Apriel-1.6-15b-Thinker-GGUF:Q4_K_M
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker · needs ~8.1 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/cnfusionchat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model cnfusion/Apriel-1.6-15b-Thinker-mlx-4Bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model cnfusion/Apriel-1.6-15b-Thinker-mlx-4Bit
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/ServiceNow-AI ↗
$ how the score was worked out · ServiceNow-AI/Apriel-1.6-15b-… 99%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 99% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 61.7 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json