whatmodel.sh / Mistral Medium (2312)

Mistral Medium (2312) is a closed-weights language model from Mistral, released December 2023.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'mistral-medium' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'mistral-medium' as 'Mistral Medium' (Mistral, Proprietary), linking https://mistral.ai/news/la-plateforme/. Released 2023-12: Mistral model card 'Mistral Medium 1.0' dated December 11, 2023 (API name mistral-medium-2312). Arena key 'mistral-medium'; LMArena's table labels it 'Mistral Medium' linking mistral.ai/news/la-plateforme (Dec 2023). Mistral card: retired 6/16/2025.

45.7±1.1comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 6 benchmark results across 5 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Mistral Medium (2312), out of 828 with a score, then more from Mistral.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
511WizardCoder Python 34B V1.0 WizardLM46±1local~23GB2023-08
512Gemini 1.0 Pro (001) Google46±2comparison only2023-12
513Mistral Medium (2312) Mistral46±1comparison only2023-12
514GPT-3.5 Turbo (0613) OpenAI46±1comparison only2023-06
515Granite 3.3 8B Instruct IBM46±1local~6.3GB2025-04
more from Mistral
79Mistral Large 4 (public preview) Mistral71±2api $2.06/M2026-10
174Mistral Medium 3.5 (128B) Mistral65±1api $3.00/M +local~42GB2026-04
180Mistral Medium 3.1 (2508) Mistral64±2comparison only2025-08

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▂▆█▆▅▄▄▃▂▁ #283 of 340 * · 2.6% of its score · 1 test

Beats DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B, Magistral Small 1.0 (2506), Llama 4 Scout (109B-A17B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Granite 4.0 H 1B, Granite 4.0 1B, SmolLM3 3B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
BFCL v351.4% ✎▁▁▁▁▁▃▅█▅▄▁▁ beats 39/114medium · avg 52%▇ 2.6%blunt · at its level
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #344 of 463 · 97% of its score · 5 tests

Beats Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512, Gemma 4 E4B, OpenThinker3 7B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Flan-T5 XXL, LFM2 700M, EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled28.6% ✎▁▂▂▃▆▆█▆▄▄▁▁ beats 76/122medium · avg 39%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 42%at its level
Arena-Hard (v0.1, GPT-4-1106 judge)31.9% ✎▂▁▁▅█▅▄▃▃▅▃▁ beats 27/60medium · avg 52%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 29%sharp · at its level
Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024)1153.0 ✎▂▁▂▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 68/95avg 1201▇▇▇▇▇ 12%blunt
LMArena (text)1222.7 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 77/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇ 12%blunt
AlpacaEval 1.0 win rate (vs text-davinci-003, GPT-4 judge)96.8% ✎▂▂·▆·▇▃▆█▆▄▃ beats 44/45very easy · avg 96%▇ 1.9%sharp · maxed out · noisy

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · AlpacaEval 1.0 and 2.0 leader… 44%, Arena-Hard-Auto v0.1 leaderbo… 29%, Polyrating: A Cost-Effective… 12% and 2 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json