whatmodel.sh / LFM2 700M
LFM2 700M
↗ share
+ contribute
LFM2 700M is an open-weights language model from Liquid AI, released July 2025. Its published size is 0.742B parameters and a 33k-token context window. Licence: lfm1.0.
Catalogue identity notes
LiquidAI/LFM2-700M @86f49fc (created 2025-07-10, licence lfm1.0). Liquid AI LFM2 hybrid (conv + attention) instruct model, July-Sept 2025; earlier generation than the catalogued LFM2.5 models. Lab rows from the LFM2-1.2B card's own LFM2 columns (3-model runs) plus independent EuroEval rows.
Model information sources
Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗
HF safetensors metadata 742,489,344 parameters (LiquidAI/LFM2-700M @86f49fc).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of LFM2 700M, out of 828 with a score, then more from Liquid AI.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 682 | 36±1 | comparison only | |||
| 683 | 36±1 | local | |||
| 684 | 36±2 | local | |||
| 685 | 36±1 | local | |||
| 686 | 36±1 | local | |||
| more from Liquid AI | |||||
| 370 | 53±1 | local | |||
| 375 | 52±1 | local | |||
| 398 | 51±1 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #277 of 393 * · 7.8% of its score · 1 test
Beats Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512, Gemma 4 E4B, Ministral 3 8B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Flan-T5 XXL here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval (aggregation unspecified) lab | 72.2% ✎ | ▄····█▄···▄█ beats 4/6 | 7.8% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #333 of 398 * · 33% of its score · 2 tests
Beats GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125), Qwen2-VL 7B Instruct, DBRX Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Qwen3 0.6B, Gemma 7B (base) here, though they rank lower overall.
other tests7 not in a task · 58% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU lab | 49.9% ✎ | █·███·█··█·█ beats 4/6 | 21% |
| MMMLU lab | 43.3% ✎ | ▄···▄·▄▄··▄█ beats 4/6 | 10% |
| IFBench (aggregation unspecified) lab | 20.6% ✎ | ▄▄·▄····▄·█▄ beats 4/6 | 9.3% |
| GPQA (subset unspecified) lab | 28.5% ✎ | █······▄▄█·▄ beats 4/6 | 6.3% |
| Open PT-LLM Leaderboard average (9 Portuguese tasks) | 55.0% ✎ | ▃▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▃█▅▁ beats 76/276 | 4.2% |
| EuroEval Life in the UK (English knowledge MC), test split, 5-shot, accuracy | 42.1% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▃▁▂▄█▄▃ beats 14/146 | 3.4% |
| EuroEval HellaSwag (English), test split, 5-shot generative MC, accuracy | 25.1% ✎ | ▃·▁▁▂▁▂▅█▇▄▁ beats 5/100 | 2.8% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run LFM2 700M · needs ~0.47 GB · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)chat in the terminal
llama cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2-700M-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf LiquidAI/LFM2-700M-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run LFM2 700M · needs ~0.47 GB · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/LiquidAI/LFM2-700M-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run LFM2 700M · needs ~0.47 GB · from huggingface.co/LiquidAI (official)chat in the terminal
ollama run hf.co/LiquidAI/LFM2-700M-GGUF:Q4_K_M
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run LFM2 700M · needs ~0.4 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/mlx-communitychat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/LFM2-700M-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/LFM2-700M-4bit
Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/LiquidAI ↗
$ how the score was worked out · LiquidAI/LFM2-1.2B model card 88%, EuroEval leaderboards (result… 6%, Open Portuguese LLM Leaderboa… 4%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 88% | |
| 2 | 6% | |
| 1 | 4% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 1% | |
| weighted average | = 36.1 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json