whatmodel.sh / MPT-30B-Chat

MPT-30B-Chat is an open-weights language model from MosaicML, released June 2023. Its published size is 30B parameters. Licence: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'mpt-30b-chat' (text). LMArena's leaderboard table (arena-leaderboard space @6f2eeeb) labels 'mpt-30b-chat' as 'MPT-30B-chat' (MosaicML, CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0), linking https://huggingface.co/mosaicml/mpt-30b-chat. Parameters: nominal size from the model name. Released 2023-06: Databricks/MosaicML blog databricks.com/blog/mpt-30b (linked from FastChat's registry as mosaicml.com/blog/mpt-30b), datePublished 2023-06-22. LMArena's table links huggingface.co/mosaicml/mpt-30b-chat (CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0), which no longer resolves; no current download verified.

35.4±2.0comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 3 benchmark results across 3 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of MPT-30B-Chat, out of 828 with a score, then more from MosaicML.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
691Mistral 7B v0.1 (base) Mistral AI36±0local~5.8GB2023-09
692Qwen2.5 1.5B Instruct Alibaba36±1local~2.4GB2024-09
693MPT-30B-Chat MosaicML35±2comparison only2023-06
694Gemma 7B (base) Google35±1local~7.1GB2024-02
695Tulu 2 DPO 7B Allen Institute for AI35±1local~5.8GB2023-11
more from MosaicML
744MPT-7B (base) MosaicML30±1comparison only2023-05
765MPT-7B-Chat MosaicML27±2comparison only2023-05

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▆█▇▇▇▃ #416 of 463 · 98% of its score · 3 tests

Beats Gemma 4 E2B, Code Llama 70B Instruct, Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct (June 2024 update) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 3 270M IT, SmolLM2 360M Instruct, Qwen2.5 0.5B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Polyrating rating (bias-aware re-fit of Chatbot Arena votes, mid-2024)1041.0 ✎▂▁▂▁▃▇█▆▇▄▂▂ beats 23/95avg 1201▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 34%blunt
LMArena (text)1150.7 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 40/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 34%blunt
MT-Bench (GPT-4 single-answer grading, LMSYS runs)6.3900 MT-Bench score (1-10) ✎▆▂▂▆▆▄██▂▄▄▆ beats 15/28avg 8.819 MT-Bench score (1-10)▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 30%sharp · noisy

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · Polyrating: A Cost-Effective… 34%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 34%, LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboa… 30%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation (arXiv:2409.00696v3)1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 34%CC-BY-4.0
LMArena leaderboard dataset1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 34%CC BY 4.0
LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboard Space: MT-Bench column of the published leaderboard table1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 30%Apache-2.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 2%
weighted average= 35.4

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json