whatmodel.sh / Hunyuan-Vision-1.5-Thinking

Hunyuan-Vision-1.5-Thinking is a closed-weights language model from Tencent, released September 2025.

Catalogue identity notes

Arena entry 'hunyuan-vision-1.5-thinking' (text, vision). Released 2025-09: date in the API snapshot id hunyuan-t1-vision-20250916. Tencent's Hunyuan-Vision-1.5 GitHub README points to LMArena's 'hunyuan-vision-1.5-thinking' and uses API model hunyuan-t1-vision-20250916; TokenHub maps HY-Vision-1.5-Thinking to that id. Weights not released as of 2026-09-28.

63.0±2.5#179 of 949 LLMsfrom 2 benchmark results across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Hunyuan-Vision-1.5-Thinking, out of 1132 with a score, then more from Tencent.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
226Hunyuan-TurboS (20250416) Tencent63±3comparison only2025-04
227Granite 4.2 30B IBM63±1api $0.28/M +local~19GB2026-08
228Hunyuan-Vision-1.5-Thinking Tencent63±3api price unknown2025-09
229Sonar Pro Perplexity63±5comparison only2025-01
230o1-preview OpenAI63±1comparison only2024-09
more from Tencent
16Hy4 preview (770B-A49B) Tencent79±1api $1.25/M +local~248GB2026-08
57Hunyuan Hy3 (295B-A21B) Tencent74±1api $0.23/M +local~96GB2026-07
139Hy3 preview (295B-A21B) Tencent68±1local~629GB2026-04

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

chat & writing▁▁▁▄▆▅▆█▆▆▆▂ #116 of 466 * · 57% of its score · 1 test

Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B), GPT-5 mini here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Nemotron-Cascade-8B, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Mistral Large 3 (675B-A41B) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1394.9 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 238/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 57%blunt
vision & documents▁▁▃▂▁▃▄▃▆▇█▄ #93 of 150 * · 40% of its score · 1 test

Beats DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails GPT-4o (2024-11-20), Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Thinking here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena vision (style controlled)1155.6 ✎▁▁▂▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 51/145avg 1068▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 40%blunt

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · Tencent Cloud TokenHub · price unknown · 40k context · cloud.tencent.com ↗

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 97%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 97%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 3%
weighted average= 63.0

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json