whatmodel.sh / Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (09-2025)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (09-2025) is a closed-weights language model from Google, released September 2025.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only. Arena entry 'gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-09-2025-no-thinking' (text, vision). Released 2025-09: Gemini API changelog: 'Launched following preview models: ... gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-09-2025'. The only Arena entry is the '-no-thinking' setting (thinking off). Gemini API changelog: 'The gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-09-2025 model has been shut down'.

62.8±2.5comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 2 benchmark results across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (09-2025), out of 1132 with a score, then more from Google.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
230o1-preview OpenAI63±1comparison only2024-09
231Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (04-17) Google63±1comparison only2025-04
232Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (09-2025) Google63±3comparison only2025-09
233GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai63±1api $0.42/M +local~35GB2025-07
234Qwen3.5 9B Alibaba63±1api $0.11/M +local~7.4GB2026-03
more from Google
9Gemini 4 Argon (limited preview) Google82±1limited preview2026-09
23Gemini 3.8 Flash Google77±1api $1.50/M2026-09
32Gemini 3.7 Flash Google76±1api $1.50/M2026-08

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▅▆█▆▆▆▂ #171 of 579 * · 57% of its score · 1 test

Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), o3-mini, K-EXAONE (236B-A23B) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 8B-A1B, LFM2.5 2.6B, Nemotron-Cascade-8B here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1379.4 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 220/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 57%blunt
vision & documents▁▁▃▃▂▃▅▅▇▇█▃ #109 of 199 * · 40% of its score · 1 test

Beats DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp), Hunyuan-Vision-1.5-Thinking here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Qwen3-VL 32B Instruct, GPT-4.1 mini here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena vision (style controlled)1174.5 ✎▁▁▂▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 59/145avg 1068▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 40%blunt

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 97%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 97%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 3%
weighted average= 62.8

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json