whatmodel.sh / MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is an open-weights language model from Xiaomi, released September 2026. Its published size is 1020B parameters (42B active per token) and a 1M-token context window. Licence: mit.

Catalogue identity notes

Arena entry 'mimo-v2.6-pro' (webdev). Maker repo XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL @73875d0: licence tag mit. Parameters: card: 'Sparse MoE, 1.02T total / 42B activated parameters'. Released 2026-09: Xiaomi MiMo model updates: '2026-09-22 MiMo-V2.6 Series Release mimo-v2.6-pro'. The webdev split (published 2026-09-24) predates the MiMo-V2.6-Pro-MOPD upload (2026-09-27), so the rated API model is taken as the launch checkpoint MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL ('the flagship checkpoint of the MiMo-V2.6 series'); Xiaomi does not state which checkpoint the API id serves.

79.2±1.1#15 of 719 LLMsfrom 13 benchmark results across 2 sources

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of MiMo-V2.6-Pro, out of 828 with a score, then more from Xiaomi.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
13GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI81±1api $67.50/M2026-03
14GPT-5.5 OpenAI80±1api $11.25/M2026-04
15MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi79±1api $0.54/M +local~443GB2026-09
16Hy4 preview (770B-A49B) Tencent79±1api $1.25/M +local~248GB2026-08
17GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI79±1api $4.50/M2026-07
more from Xiaomi
27MiMo-V2.6-Flash (309B-A15B) Xiaomi77±1api $0.17/M +local~136GB2026-09
91MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi70±1comparison only2026-03
95MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1T-A42B) Xiaomi70±1api $0.65/M +local~163GB2026-04

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #17 of 300 · 50% of its score · 7 tests

Beats GPT-5.5 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails GLM-5.3, Claude Haiku 5.5, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena Agent (October 2026 aggregate IPS)0.0352 IPS ✎▁▁▁▄▂▃▇█▂▂▁▃ beats 31/49avg -0.312 IPS▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 22%sharp
Terminal-Bench 4.0 lab34.9% ✎▁·▁··▁▇▇▅██▃ beats 17/30very hard · avg 0.4%▇▇▇▇▇ 12%sharp · at its level · small run
Terminal-Bench 2.1 lab89.9% ✎▁·▁·▁▁▄▃▄█▃▇ beats 54/56hard · avg 21%▇▇ 5.6%small run
OSWorld-Verified lab82.0% ✎█▄·▂▆▂▄▂▆▄▆█ beats 21/25hard · avg 25%▇▇ 4.2%small run
Agents' Last Exam (metric/harness unspecified) lab31.6% ✎▂·▂·█▃···▂▄▄ beats 6/11very hard · avg 6.4%▇ 3.2%at its level · small run
Toolathlon-Verified lab76.9% ✎▂·▂▂▅▃···▂██ beats 13/18hard · avg 31%▇ 1.8%blunt · at its level · small run
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) lab71.9% ✎▂····▁▁▁▆██▆ beats 22/28hard · avg 18%▇ 1.4%at its level · noisy · small run
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #23 of 458 * · 21% of its score · 2 tests

Beats GPT-5.5 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Grok 4.7, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena WebDev (Code Arena)1618.4 ✎▁▂▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 98/119avg 981▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 19%sharp
DeepSWE v1.1 (resolved) lab71.9% ✎▂····▁▁▁▆██▆ beats 22/28hard · avg 18%▇ 1.4%at its level · noisy · small run
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #20 of 393 * · 11% of its score · 1 test

Beats GPT-6 Astra, Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6 Sol here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemini 3.6 Flash, Claude Opus 4.6, Muse Spark 1.1 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LMArena (text)1480.1 ✎▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 357/379avg 1268▇▇▇▇ 11%blunt
vision & documents▁▁▃▂▁▃▄▂▆▇█▄ #50 of 147 * · 7.5% of its score · 1 test

Trails Qwen3.6 Flash, Gemma 4 31B, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Arena vision (style controlled)1245.2 ✎▁▁▂▂▂▂▄▅▅▆██ beats 98/145avg 1068▇▇▇ 7.5%blunt
other tests3 not in a task · 11% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
AutomationBench v1.0.6 lab53.1% ✎▃····▃·▃▃··█ beats 6/6very hard · avg 5.6%▇▇ 4.3%at its level · small run
SEC-Bench Pro (pass@1) lab66.3% ✎▄··▄···▄·▄·█ beats 5/5very hard · avg 6.4%▇ 3.7%at its level · small run
ExploitGym (pass@1) lab17.8% ✎▄···▄··▄▄··█ beats 5/5very hard · avg 0.6%▇ 3.2%noisy · small run

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · Xiaomi MiMo · $0.54/M · $0.435 in / $0.87 out per 1M tokens · 1M context · mimo.mi.com ↗ · price sourceStandard base token rate from models.dev (revision 6b32416, observed 2026-10-07). Provider-specific tiers, long-context surcharges, caching and promotions may differ.

llama.cpp · recommended

version

  1. Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.
    macOS / Linux
    curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | sh
    Windows
    irm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex

    other ways to install ↗

  2. Run MiMo-V2.6-Pro · needs ~420.38 GB · from huggingface.co/ggml-org
    chat in the terminal
    llama cli -hf ggml-org/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL-GGUF:Q2_K
  3. Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
    llama serve -hf ggml-org/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL-GGUF:Q2_K

LM Studio

version

  1. Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.

    download it (macOS / Windows / Linux) ↗

  2. Run MiMo-V2.6-Pro · needs ~420.38 GB · from huggingface.co/ggml-org

    open in LM Studio ↗

  3. Or download it in the terminal
    lms get https://huggingface.co/ggml-org/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL-GGUF@Q2_K -y
  4. Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/XiaomiMiMo ↗

$ how the score was worked out · LMArena leaderboard dataset 60%, Xiaomi MiMo official model ca… 40%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
LMArena leaderboard dataset4▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 60%CC BY 4.0
Xiaomi MiMo official model cards and documentation · lab-reported9▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 40%Factual first-party specification (not licensed content)
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 1%
weighted average= 79.2

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json