whatmodel.sh / Granite 4.1 8B
Granite 4.1 8B
↗ share
+ contribute
Granite 4.1 8B is an open-weights language model from IBM, released April 2026. Its published size is 8.79B parameters and a 131k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Comparison-only. Model card (ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b @1504002): 8B instruct model, Release Date April 29th 2026, Apache 2.0; parameter count 8,791,592,960 from the Hugging Face safetensors metadata (dense, so active = total). Arena entry 'granite-4.1-8b' (ibm, Apache 2.0).
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Granite 4.1 8B, out of 828 with a score, then more from IBM.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 334 | 54±1 | api $0.15/M +local | |||
| 335 | 54±1 | local | |||
| 336 | 54±1 | api $0.11/M +local | |||
| 337 | 54±3 | local | |||
| 338 | 54±3 | local | |||
| more from IBM | |||||
| 192 | 63±1 | api $0.28/M +local | |||
| 239 | 60±1 | api $0.11/M +local | |||
| 276 | 57±1 | api $0.052/M +local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #206 of 300 * · 7.6% of its score · 2 tests
Beats o1 (2024-12-17), o3-mini, DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SmolLM3 3B, Jamba 1.5 Mini, Mellum2 12B-A2.5B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Telecom lab | 17.5% ✎ | ▁·▅█▆▅▂▃▃▂▃▁ beats 10/89 | 6.5% |
| BFCL v3 lab | 68.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅█▆▅▄▁ beats 141/170 | 1.0% |
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #193 of 458 · 36% of its score · 8 tests
Beats Gemini 2.5 Flash, Qwen3.5 4B, Qwen3 30B-A3B Instruct 2507 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails QwQ-32B-Preview, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Instruct (0724), DeepSeek-V2.5 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena WebDev (Code Arena) | 1190.3 ✎ | ▁▃▄▃▅█▄▇▆▄▁▁ beats 4/119 | 13% |
| HumanEval lab | 85.4% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅▅█▃▂▁ beats 174/190 | 6.1% |
| HumanEval+ lab | 79.9% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▂▃▄▄█▅▄▃ beats 109/145 | 5.4% |
| MBPP lab | 87.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▄▅█▄▅▃▁▂▃ beats 80/81 | 2.6% |
| MultiPL-E lab | 60.3% ✎ | ▃··▄·▅▅▇▄█▃▄ beats 13/31 | 2.5% |
| BigCodeBench lab | 35.0% ✎ | ▅····▃·█▃▅█▃ beats 7/12 | 2.5% |
| MBPP+ lab | 73.8% ✎ | ▁··▁▁▃▄█▆▄▁▁ beats 96/120 | 2.1% |
| CRUXEval-O lab | 47.6% ✎ | ▂▂██▅▂▁·▁·▁▁ beats 41/51 | 1.4% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #215 of 393 * · 8.9% of its score · 2 tests
Beats Granite 4.2 8B, Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Gemma 2 9B IT SimPO here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct, Granite 4.0 H Micro 3B, Gemma 3n E4B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena (text) | 1304.1 ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▃▃▃▆▆▇█▃ beats 131/379 | 7.2% |
| IFEval (aggregation unspecified) lab | 87.1% ✎ | ▁▁▃▁▂▄▄▆█▃▂▁ beats 87/141 | 1.7% |
math▄··········█ #1 of 3 · 17% of its score · 5 tests
Beats Granite 4.1 30B here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8K lab | 92.5% ✎ | ▂▂▂▅▅▆▅▇█▇▄▃ beats 130/146 | 5.6% |
| Minerva MATH lab | 80.1% ✎ | ▄·▂▂·██▆·▆▄▄ beats 20/21 | 3.9% |
| DeepMind Mathematics lab | 80.1% ✎ | ▅····▅·█▃▃·▅ beats 9/10 | 3.8% |
| GSM-Symbolic lab | 83.7% ✎ | ▃▃····▃·▅▅█▃ beats 9/10 | 2.0% |
| MGSM, 5 languages (en, es, fr, ja, zh) lab | 82.3% ✎ | █·▄▄██···█·▄ beats 10/10 | 1.6% |
other tests7 not in a task · 31% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA (subset unspecified) lab | 42.0% ✎ | ▂▁▂▂▄▃▆▃▅█▄▃ beats 43/104 | 6.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard lab | 80.5% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅█▃▄▁ beats 110/129 | 6.1% |
| MMLU lab | 73.8% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▅█▃▆▃ beats 124/183 | 4.4% |
| SimpleQA lab | 4.8% ✎ | ▄▄▄▆█▆███·▂█ beats 4/32 | 3.9% |
| MMLU-Pro lab | 56.0% ✎ | ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▃▄▅█▁ beats 55/188 | 3.7% |
| INCLUDE lab | 58.9% ✎ | ▂····▂▂▄▄▄█▄ beats 11/36 | 3.5% |
| MMMLU lab | 64.8% ✎ | ▂▁▁▂▃▂▄▄▅██▃ beats 17/46 | 2.9% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · Replicate · $0.11/M · $0.06 in / $0.25 out per 1M tokens · 131k context · replicate.com ↗ · price sourceUSD per 1M tokens, Replicate official model ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b, billed per input/output token (billing table on the model page: $0.06 per million input tokens, $0.25 per million output tokens; A100 80GB backing hardware not billed separately for this official model). IBM watsonx lists granite-4-1-8b as not available for pay-per-token. Currency: USD. Replicate official model page, observed 2026-09-25.
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Granite 4.1 8B · needs ~5.35 GB · from huggingface.co/ibm-granitechat in the terminal
llama cli -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Granite 4.1 8B · needs ~5.35 GB · from huggingface.co/ibm-granite
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Granite 4.1 8B · needs ~5.35 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run granite4.1:8b
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Granite 4.1 8B · needs ~5.2 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/mlx-communitychat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model mlx-community/granite-4.1-8b-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model mlx-community/granite-4.1-8b-4bit
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/ibm-granite ↗
$ how the score was worked out · ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b mo… 73%, LMArena leaderboard dataset 20%, Synthesize and Reward: Reinfo… 7%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | 73% | |
| 2 | 20% | |
| 1 | 7% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 54.3 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json