whatmodel.sh / Olmo 3 7B Instruct
Olmo 3 7B Instruct
↗ share
+ contribute
Olmo 3 7B Instruct is an open-weights language model from Ai2, released November 2025. Its published size is 7.3B parameters and a 66k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Olmo 3 7B Instruct, out of 828 with a score, then more from Ai2.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 517 | 46±1 | comparison only | |||
| 518 | 46±3 | local | |||
| 519 | 46±1 | local | |||
| 520 | 46±2 | local | |||
| 521 | 46±1 | local | |||
| more from Ai2 | |||||
| 259 | 58±1 | local | |||
| 262 | 58±1 | local | |||
| 314 | 55±2 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▆▅▅▅▄▃▁ #288 of 300 · 3.4% of its score · 3 tests
Trails Granite 4.0 350M, Granite 4.0 H 350M, ChatGLM3-6B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BFCL (version not stated) lab | 49.8% ✎ | ▄▆▄▂·█▆·▄··▂ beats 0/17 | 1.3% |
| BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive) | 19.8% ✎ | ▁▁▁▃▇▆▆▆█▂▄▂ beats 6/111 | 1.3% |
| BFCL v3 | 41.9% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅█▆▅▄▁ beats 21/170 | 0.8% |
coding▁▁▁▃▆██▇▆▄▃▁ #340 of 458 · 14% of its score · 5 tests
Beats LFM2.5 2.6B, LFM2.5 8B-A1B, Qwen3-VL 2B Thinking here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct (Apr 2024), DeepSeek LLM 67B Chat, WizardLM 70B V1.0 here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ lab | 77.2% ✎ | ▂·······▃·▂█ beats 1/6 | 4.1% |
| LiveCodeBench v6 (window unspecified) | 28.2% ✎ | ▂▃▄▄▅██▅▄▇▃▆ beats 2/65 | 3.7% |
| MBPP+ lab | 60.2% ✎ | ▄▄····▄·▄··█ beats 0/5 | 2.5% |
| LiveCodeBench v3 lab | 29.5% ✎ | ▃▃·····▃·▃·█ beats 0/6 | 2.3% |
| MultiPL-E | 36.1% ✎ | ▃··▄·▅▅▇▄█▃▄ beats 3/31 | 1.1% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #218 of 393 · 4.4% of its score · 2 tests
Beats Granite 4.2 8B, Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Olmo 3.1 32B Think here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpacaEval 2 length-controlled lab | 40.9% ✎ | █···█·█·█·██ beats 1/5 | 2.9% |
| IFEval (aggregation unspecified) lab +1 | 85.6% ✎ | ▄▄·····█▄▄·▄ beats 2/6 | 1.5% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #200 of 398 · 20% of its score · 4 tests
Beats MiniMax-M2.1, Qwen3 235B-A22B (Apr 2025, hybrid), DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2024 lab | 44.3% ✎ | ▄·····▄··▄██ beats 1/6 | 10% |
| AIME 2025 lab | 32.5% ✎ | ▄··▄····█▄▄▄ beats 1/6 | 8.0% |
| OMEGA (math generalisation) lab | 28.9% ✎ | █···▄·▄·▄··█ beats 5/6 | 1.4% |
| MATH (subset unspecified) lab | 87.3% ✎ | ██····██·███ beats 5/6 | 1.3% |
other tests14 not in a task · 58% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard lab | 71.2% ✎ | ▄·····▄·▄·██ beats 1/6 | 12% |
| Medmarks-V mean win rate (19 verifiable medical benchmarks, 71 configurations) | 0.3503 ✎ | ▁▄▃▃▇▄█▃▅▁▁▁ beats 1/30 | 8.5% |
| GPQA (subset unspecified) lab | 40.4% ✎ | ▃······▃·▅·█ beats 1/6 | 5.9% |
| MMLU lab | 69.1% ✎ | ▄···▄··█··▄█ beats 1/6 | 5.8% |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.9% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅███▄ beats 52/310 | 5.5% |
| MMLU-Redux | 71.8% ✎ | ▁▁▃▁▂▃▄▅▇▅█▄ beats 4/63 | 4.7% |
| AGIEval English lab | 64.4% ✎ | ▄····▄·▄▄··█ beats 0/5 | 4.3% |
| Medmarks-V weighted mean win rate (61 models, 71 configurations) | 35.0% ✎ | ▂▃▅▂▆▃█▅█▅▃▆ beats 1/34 | 3.9% |
6 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZebraLogic lab | 32.9% ✎ | █▄····▄·▄·▄▄ beats 1/6 | 2.3% |
| PopQA lab | 14.1% ✎ | ▄··█···▄···█ beats 0/5 | 1.3% |
| IFBench (aggregation unspecified) lab | 32.3% ✎ | █·██·██····█ beats 1/5 | 1.2% |
| EuroEval HellaSwag (English), test split, 5-shot generative MC, accuracy | 61.3% ✎ | ▃·▁▁▂▁▂▅█▇▄▁ beats 36/100 | 1.0% |
| GSM-Plus | 85.8% ✎ | ▁··▁▁▁·▃▁▄█▁ beats 7/16 | 0.9% |
| EuroEval Life in the UK (English knowledge MC), test split, 5-shot, accuracy | 75.1% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▄▃ beats 49/146 | 0.8% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Olmo 3 7B Instruct · needs ~4.5 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-communitychat in the terminal
llama cli -hf lmstudio-community/Olmo-3-7B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf lmstudio-community/Olmo-3-7B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Olmo 3 7B Instruct · needs ~4.5 GB · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-community
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/lmstudio-community/Olmo-3-7B-Instruct-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Olmo 3 7B Instruct · needs ~4.88 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run olmo-3:7b-instruct
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Olmo 3 7B Instruct · needs ~4.1 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-communitychat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/Olmo-3-7B-Instruct-MLX-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model lmstudio-community/Olmo-3-7B-Instruct-MLX-4bit
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/allenai ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Olmo 3 63%, JetBrains/Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-I… 19%, Medmarks: A Comprehensive Ope… 12% and 2 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 63% | |
| 8 | 19% | |
| 2 | 12% | |
| 3 | 4% | |
| 2 | 2% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 45.5 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json