whatmodel.sh / Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B)
Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B)
↗ share
+ contribute
Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B) is an open-weights language model from IBM, released September 2025. Its published size is 6.94B parameters (1B active per token) and a 131k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
IBM Granite-4.0-H-Tiny (ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-tiny @791e0d3, created 2025-09-16, apache-2.0, 6,939,037,248 params; card architecture table '# Parameters 7B', '# Active parameters 1B'): hybrid Mamba-2 MoE instruct model. Lab rows from the h-small card's 'H Tiny MoE' column; independent EuroEval and Vectara rows.
Model information sources
Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗
HF safetensors metadata of ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-tiny @791e0d3; active parameters from the maker card architecture table.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B), out of 828 with a score, then more from IBM.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 460 | 48±1 | local | |||
| 461 | 48±2 | local | |||
| 462 | 48±1 | local | |||
| 463 | 48±1 | local | |||
| 464 | 48±2 | local | |||
| more from IBM | |||||
| 192 | 63±1 | api $0.28/M +local | |||
| 239 | 60±1 | api $0.11/M +local | |||
| 276 | 57±1 | api $0.052/M +local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▄·▄········█ #3 of 4 * · 1.3% of its score · 1 test
Trails Granite 4.0 Micro 3B here, though they rank lower overall.
coding█···▄······▄ #2 of 4 · 33% of its score · 7 tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval lab | 83.0% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅▅█▃▂▁ beats 170/190 | 10% |
| HumanEval+ lab | 76.0% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▂▃▄▄█▅▄▃ beats 98/145 | 8.6% |
| MBPP lab | 80.0% ✎ | ▁▁▁▄▅█▄▅▃▃▂▁ beats 75/81 | 4.0% |
| BigCodeBench lab | 41.1% ✎ | ▅····▃·█▃▅█▃ beats 11/12 | 3.2% |
| MultiPL-E lab | 55.8% ✎ | ▃··▄·▅▅▇▄█▃▄ beats 10/31 | 3.1% |
| MBPP+ lab | 69.0% ✎ | ▁··▁▁▃▄█▆▄▁▁ beats 80/120 | 2.7% |
| CRUXEval-O lab | 39.6% ✎ | ▂▂██▅▂▁·▁·▁▁ beats 23/51 | 1.8% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #235 of 393 * · 4.8% of its score · 2 tests
Beats Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Flan-T5 XXL, LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct, Gemma 3 4B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval instruction-level strict lab | 84.8% ✎ | ▄▄····▄▄█▄·█ beats 4/8 | 2.5% |
| IFEval prompt-level strict lab | 78.1% ✎ | ▁▁··▂··▂▇█▃▃ beats 7/26 | 2.3% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #237 of 398 · 24% of its score · 5 tests
Beats Command A (03-2025), GPT-4o (2024-11-20), GPT-4o (2024-05-13) here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Tulu 2 DPO 70B, OpenThinker 7B, Olmo 3 7B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8K lab | 84.7% ✎ | ▂▂▂▅▅▆▅▇█▇▄▃ beats 101/146 | 7.0% |
| DeepMind Mathematics lab | 49.9% ✎ | ▅····▅·█▃▃·▅ beats 6/10 | 5.5% |
| Minerva MATH lab | 69.6% ✎ | ▄·▂▂·██▆·▆▄▄ beats 18/21 | 5.2% |
| GSM-Symbolic lab | 81.1% ✎ | ▃▃····▃·▅▅█▃ beats 7/10 | 4.4% |
| MGSM, 5 languages (en, es, fr, ja, zh) lab | 45.4% ✎ | █·▄▄██···█·▄ beats 7/10 | 1.8% |
other tests9 not in a task · 36% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard lab | 66.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅█▃▄▁ beats 82/129 | 7.5% |
| GPQA (subset unspecified) lab | 32.6% ✎ | ▂▁▂▂▄▃▆▃▅█▄▃ beats 29/104 | 7.2% |
| MMLU lab | 68.7% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▅█▃▆▃ beats 107/183 | 6.0% |
| MMLU-Pro lab | 44.9% ✎ | ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂▄▅█▁ beats 40/188 | 4.9% |
| INCLUDE lab | 53.1% ✎ | ▂····▂▂▄▄▄█▄ beats 9/36 | 4.4% |
| MMMLU lab | 61.9% ✎ | ▂▁▁▂▃▂▄▄▅██▃ beats 15/46 | 3.7% |
| EuroEval HellaSwag (English), test split, 5-shot generative MC, accuracy | 70.4% ✎ | ▃·▁▁▂▁▂▅█▇▄▁ beats 51/100 | 1.3% |
| EuroEval Life in the UK (English knowledge MC), test split, 5-shot, accuracy | 81.2% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▄▃ beats 71/146 | 0.9% |
1 more test
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vectara hallucination leaderboard, 2025 dataset (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate) | 92.7% ✎ | ▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 41/140 | 0.5% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B) · needs ~4.23 GB · from huggingface.co/ibm-granitechat in the terminal
llama cli -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-tiny-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-tiny-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B) · needs ~4.23 GB · from huggingface.co/ibm-granite
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-tiny-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B) · needs ~4.2 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run granite4:tiny-h
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B) · needs ~3.9 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/lmstudio-communitychat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model lmstudio-community/granite-4.0-h-tiny-MLX-4bit - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model lmstudio-community/granite-4.0-h-tiny-MLX-4bit
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/ibm-granite ↗
$ how the score was worked out · ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-sma… 97%, EuroEval leaderboards (result… 2%, Vectara hallucination leaderb… 1%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | 97% | |
| 2 | 2% | |
| 1 | 1% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 47.7 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json