whatmodel.sh / Granite 4.0 Micro 3B
Granite 4.0 Micro 3B
↗ share
+ contribute
Granite 4.0 Micro 3B is an open-weights language model from IBM, released September 2025. Its published size is 3.4B parameters and a 131k-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Granite 4.0 Micro 3B, out of 828 with a score, then more from IBM.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 498 | 46±3 | local | |||
| 499 | 46±2 | local | |||
| 500 | 46±1 | local | |||
| 501 | 46±1 | api $0.26/M +local | |||
| 502 | 46±1 | comparison only | |||
| more from IBM | |||||
| 192 | 63±1 | api $0.28/M +local | |||
| 239 | 60±1 | api $0.11/M +local | |||
| 276 | 57±1 | api $0.052/M +local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▄·▄········█ #2 of 4 * · 1.2% of its score · 1 test
Beats Granite 4.0 H Tiny (7B-A1B), Granite 4.0 H Micro 3B here, though they rank higher overall.
coding█···▄······▄ #3 of 4 · 32% of its score · 7 tests
Beats Granite 4.0 H Micro 3B here, though they rank higher overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval lab | 80.0% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▃▅▅█▃▂▁ beats 161/190 | 10% |
| HumanEval+ lab | 72.0% ✎ | ▁·▁▁▂▃▄▄█▅▄▃ beats 90/145 | 8.4% |
| MBPP lab | 72.0% ✎ | ▁▁▁▄▅█▄▅▃▁▂▁ beats 68/81 | 3.8% |
| MultiPL-E lab | 49.2% ✎ | ▃··▄·▅▅▇▄█▃▄ beats 5/31 | 2.9% |
| BigCodeBench lab | 39.2% ✎ | ▅····▃·█▃▅█▃ beats 10/12 | 2.9% |
| MBPP+ lab | 64.0% ✎ | ▁··▁▁▃▄█▆▄▁▁ beats 60/120 | 2.6% |
| CRUXEval-O lab | 41.5% ✎ | ▂▂██▅▂▁·▁·▁▁ beats 33/51 | 1.6% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▅▄▅█▆▆▇▃ #222 of 393 * · 4.6% of its score · 2 tests
Beats Granite 4.2 8B, Mistral Small 4 (119B-A6.5B), Olmo 3.1 32B Think here, though they rank higher overall. Trails LFM2.5 1.2B Instruct, Gemma 3 4B, Olmo 3 7B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval instruction-level strict lab | 85.5% ✎ | ▄▄····▄▄█▄·█ beats 5/8 | 2.4% |
| IFEval prompt-level strict lab | 79.1% ✎ | ▁▁··▂··▂▇█▃▃ beats 8/26 | 2.2% |
math▁▂▃▅▆▅▄█▄▁▁▁ #272 of 398 · 24% of its score · 6 tests
Beats Molmo 2 8B, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Instruct (0724), Llama 3.1 70B Instruct here, though they rank higher overall. Trails DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, Mixtral 8x7B v0.1 (base), InternVL2-4B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8K lab | 85.5% ✎ | ▂▂▂▅▅▆▅▇█▇▄▃ beats 105/146 | 7.0% |
| DeepMind Mathematics lab | 44.6% ✎ | ▅····▅·█▃▃·▅ beats 5/10 | 5.0% |
| Minerva MATH lab | 62.1% ✎ | ▄·▂▂·██▆·▆▄▄ beats 15/21 | 4.9% |
| GSM-Symbolic lab | 79.8% ✎ | ▃▃····▃·▅▅█▃ beats 6/10 | 4.3% |
| MGSM, 5 languages (en, es, fr, ja, zh) lab | 28.6% ✎ | █·▄▄██···█·▄ beats 3/10 | 1.6% |
| OTIS mock AIME 2024–2025 | 2.8% ✎ | ▃▃▄▃▃▃▇▇█▃▂▅ beats 23/193 | 1.0% |
other tests11 not in a task · 38% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard lab | 72.5% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅█▃▄▁ beats 101/129 | 7.0% |
| GPQA (subset unspecified) lab | 30.1% ✎ | ▂▁▂▂▄▃▆▃▅█▄▃ beats 22/104 | 5.8% |
| MMLU lab | 66.0% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▅█▃▆▃ beats 92/183 | 5.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▃▂▄▆▄▅▇█▅ beats 14/208 | 5.5% |
| MMLU-Pro lab | 44.5% ✎ | ▁▁·▁▁▁▃▂▄▅█▁ beats 38/188 | 4.3% |
| INCLUDE lab | 51.6% ✎ | ▂····▂▃▄▄▄█▄ beats 6/36 | 3.9% |
| MMMLU lab | 55.1% ✎ | ▂▁▁▂▃▂▄▄▅██▃ beats 11/46 | 3.4% |
| EuroEval HellaSwag (English), test split, 5-shot generative MC, accuracy | 70.8% ✎ | ▃·▁▁▂▁▂▅█▇▄▁ beats 52/100 | 1.2% |
3 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| EuroEval Life in the UK (English knowledge MC), test split, 5-shot, accuracy | 77.3% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▄▃ beats 57/146 | 0.9% |
| Vectara hallucination leaderboard, 2025 dataset (HHEM-2.3, factual consistency rate) | 93.5% ✎ | ▁▁▂▃▄▄█▆▃▂▂▁ beats 47/140 | 0.5% |
| Chess Puzzles (Epoch) | 0.0% ✎ | █▁▁▁▁▂▁▄▂▂▁▁ beats 45/135 | 0.1% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Granite 4.0 Micro 3B · needs ~2.1 GB · from huggingface.co/ibm-granitechat in the terminal
llama cli -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.0-micro-GGUF:Q4_K_M - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf ibm-granite/granite-4.0-micro-GGUF:Q4_K_M
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Granite 4.0 Micro 3B · needs ~2.1 GB · from huggingface.co/ibm-granite
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-micro-GGUF@Q4_K_M -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Granite 4.0 Micro 3B · needs ~2.54 GB · from ollama.comchat in the terminal
ollama run granite4:micro
MLX (Mac)
version
- Install MLX (Mac) · Apple silicon Macs only, text only.with uv
uv tool install mlx-lmorpip install mlx-lm - Run Granite 4.0 Micro 3B · needs ~1.9 GB, Mac only · from huggingface.co/ethicalabschat in the terminal
mlx_lm.chat --model ethicalabs/granite-4.0-micro-MLX - Or start an OpenAI-compatible server at http://localhost:8080/v1
mlx_lm.server --model ethicalabs/granite-4.0-micro-MLX
Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/ibm-granite ↗
$ how the score was worked out · ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-sma… 90%, Epoch AI — internal evaluatio… 7%, EuroEval leaderboards (result… 2% and 1 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | 90% | |
| 3 | 7% | |
| 2 | 2% | |
| 1 | 0% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 46.0 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json