whatmodel.sh / GPT-5-Codex

GPT-5-Codex is a closed-weights language model from OpenAI, released September 2025.

Catalogue identity notes

Comparison-only, proposed so the WebApp1K-Duo entry 'gpt-5-codex' (webapp1k-duo-react-pass1, 43 catalogue models) counts. Released 2025-09: OpenAI API changelog, Sep 23 (2025): 'Launched special-purpose model gpt-5-codex, built and optimized for use with the Codex CLI'. Undated API alias (no dated snapshot listed). OpenAI deprecations page: gpt-5-codex shut down July 23, 2026 (replacement gpt-5.6-sol). Distinct from gpt-5-1-codex and gpt-5.

67.6±4.8comparison only: no current run option verifiedfrom 1 benchmark result across 1 source* thinly tested, treat the rank as provisional

$ how it compares

The LLMs ranked either side of GPT-5-Codex, out of 1132 with a score, then more from OpenAI.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
138Ornith 1.0 35B (35B-A3B) DeepReinforce68±1local~23GB2026-06
139Hy3 preview (295B-A21B) Tencent68±1local~629GB2026-04
140GPT-5-Codex OpenAI68±5comparison only2025-09
141GPT-5 mini OpenAI67±1api $0.69/M2025-08
142Gemini 2.5 Pro Google67±1api $3.44/M2025-06
more from OpenAI
1GPT-6 Astra OpenAI87±1api $20.00/M2026-09
3GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI85±1api $4.00/M2026-09
7GPT-6 Sol OpenAI83±1api $4.00/M2026-09

see all LLMs · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▂▁ #111 of 549 * · 90% of its score · 1 test

Beats Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), Grok 4.3, Muse Glimmer 30B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B-A3B, MiniMax-M2.1 here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
WebApp1K-Duo-React pass@1 (onekq-ai)75.0% ✎▁··▁·▁▁▁▆█▇█ beats 36/45hard · avg 32%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 90%at its level

$ where to run it

No verified API or download recorded yet · add one

$ how the score was worked out · WebApp1K models leaderboard (… 90%

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
WebApp1K models leaderboard (onekq-ai)1▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 90%MIT
prior · pull toward the middle▇▇▇ 10%
weighted average= 67.6

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json