whatmodel.sh / Spark-X2.6 4B
Spark-X2.6 4B
↗ share
+ contribute
Spark-X2.6 4B is an open-weights language model from iFLYTEK (SparkLLM), released October 2026. Its published size is 4.112B parameters and a 1M-token context window. Licence: apache-2.0.
Catalogue identity notes
Post-trained Spark-X2.6 checkpoint, distinct from X2.5 and Base. Published evaluations use thinking high, temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k -1. Quantized download quality and speed were not measured in this update.
Model information sources
Release date ↗ · Weights licence ↗ · Parameter count ↗
Hugging Face safetensors metadata: 4,112,079,360 parameters.
Score within the LMArena (text) comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The LLMs ranked either side of Spark-X2.6 4B, out of 886 with a score, then more from iFLYTEK (SparkLLM).
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 124 | 67±2 | comparison only | |||
| 125 | 67±1 | local | |||
| 126 | 67±1 | local | |||
| 127 | 67±1 | api $0.29/M +local | |||
| 128 | 67±1 | api $0.15/M +local | |||
| more from iFLYTEK (SparkLLM) | |||||
| 169 | 65±1 | local | |||
| 260 | 59±1 | local | |||
| 347 | 55±1 | local | |||
$ what it's good at
agent tasks▁▁▃▆█▄▅▅▄▄▂▁ #94 of 313 · 31% of its score · 7 tests
Beats Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), GPT-5.1, o3-pro here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Hy3 preview (295B-A21B), MiniMax-M2.7, Step 3.5 Flash (196B-A11B) here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified) lab | 54.3% ✎ | ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃█▇▂▁ beats 32/58 | 10% |
| BrowseComp lab | 53.1% ✎ | ▂·▃▁▂▂▆▅█▂▂▄ beats 22/46 | 4.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified lab | 62.8% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁▁ beats 64/138 | 3.9% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual lab | 64.7% ✎ | ▁··▁▃▁▅██▂▂▁ beats 28/65 | 3.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam with tools lab | 36.9% ✎ | ▁·▁▂▂▁▄▄▇█▄▅ beats 18/62 | 3.4% |
| BFCL V4 (December 2025 archive) lab | 71.8% ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▆▆▅▆█▂▄▃ beats 108/114 | 3.0% |
| τ²-bench aggregate lab | 86.9% ✎ | ▁▁▁·▁▁▃▃▃▄█▁ beats 34/39 | 2.6% |
coding▁▁▁▃▅▇█▇▅▄▃▁ #101 of 469 · 22% of its score · 4 tests
Beats Grok 4.20 (0309 reasoning), Grok 4.3, Muse Glimmer 30B here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1, Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507, o4-mini here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Pro (split unspecified) lab | 54.3% ✎ | ▂·▁▁▁▁▂▃█▇▂▁ beats 32/58 | 10% |
| SciCode (level unspecified) lab | 36.8% ✎ | ▁····▃▃▄▅█▆▂ beats 22/40 | 4.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified lab | 62.8% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▄█▆▁▁ beats 64/138 | 3.9% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual lab | 64.7% ✎ | ▁··▁▃▁▅██▂▂▁ beats 28/65 | 3.5% |
chat & writing▁▁▁▃▆▄▆█▆▇▇▃ #100 of 402 * · 2.1% of its score · 1 test
Beats LongCat 2.0 (1.6T-A48B), Inkling Small (266B-A12B), GPT-5.4 nano here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemma 4 12B, Kimi K2 Instruct (0905), Gemma 4 26B-A4B here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval (aggregation unspecified) lab | 93.6% ✎ | ▁▂▄▂▂▄▆██▅▂▁ beats 135/145 | 2.1% |
math▁▁▃▅█▆▄█▄▂▁▁ #95 of 431 · 18% of its score · 3 tests
Beats Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.5, MiniMax-M3 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails Gemini 2.5 Flash, Granite 4.2 30B, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| HMMT February 2026 lab | 81.3% ✎ | ▃▃▂▅·████▅▃▅ beats 22/35 | 6.6% |
| IMO-AnswerBench lab | 75.2% ✎ | ▁▁·▁▁▁▄▆█▄▂▃ beats 15/44 | 6.2% |
| AIME 2026 lab | 91.2% ✎ | ▁▁▁▂▂▂▆█▆▂·▁ beats 27/52 | 5.4% |
web search▅·▅▅█·▃▃▃·▅▃ #1 of 15 * · 7.5% of its score · 2 tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseComp lab | 53.1% ✎ | ▂·▃▁▂▂▆▅█▂▂▄ beats 22/46 | 4.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam with tools lab | 36.9% ✎ | ▁·▁▂▂▁▄▄▇█▄▅ beats 18/62 | 3.4% |
other tests5 not in a task · 44% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond lab | 77.1% ✎ | ▁▁▁▁▂▄▅▅███▄ beats 190/322 | 14% |
| GPQA (subset unspecified) lab | 69.9% ✎ | ▂▁▂▂▄▃▆▃▅█▃▃ beats 77/106 | 11% |
| Humanity's Last Exam lab | 17.9% ✎ | ▁▁▁▄▆▆▇██▆▁▃ beats 45/111 | 8.3% |
| LongBench v2 lab | 53.3% ✎ | ▂·▁·▂▃▁▄▄▃█▄ beats 19/33 | 7.9% |
| IFBench (aggregation unspecified) lab | 75.8% ✎ | ▂▆▂▄▄▄▂▄▄▆█▇ beats 68/86 | 3.0% |
$ where to run it
llama.cpp · recommended
version
- Install llama.cpp · Homebrew and winget installs name the commands llama-cli and llama-server instead.macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://llama.app/install.sh | shWindowsirm https://llama.app/install.ps1 | iex - Run Spark-X2.6 4B · needs ~3.5434 GB · from huggingface.co/XHTokenchat in the terminal
llama cli -hf XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF - Or start a local server and open the address it prints (http://localhost:9931)
llama serve -hf XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF
LM Studio
version
- Install LM Studio · Open the app once before using the lms command.
- Run Spark-X2.6 4B · needs ~3.5434 GB · from huggingface.co/XHToken
- Or download it in the terminal
lms get https://huggingface.co/XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF -y - Then run lms ls to see its name, and lms chat followed by that name
Ollama
version
- Install Ollama
download it (macOS / Windows) ↗
Linuxcurl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh - Run Spark-X2.6 4B · needs ~3.5434 GB · from huggingface.co/XHTokenchat in the terminal
ollama run hf.co/XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF
Model repository and documentation: huggingface.co/XHToken ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Spark-X2.6 model cards (think… 100%
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
| source | results | share of the score |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | 100% | |
| prior · pull toward the middle | 0% | |
| weighted average | = 67.2 |
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json