whatmodel.sh / stt / Chirp 3
Chirp 3
↗ share
+ contribute
Chirp 3 is a closed-weights speech-to-text model from Google, released March 2025. Licence: proprietary.
Score within the Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026) comparison set only.
$ how it compares
The speech-to-text models ranked either side of Chirp 3, out of 176 with a score, then more from Google.
| # | model | score | where | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 61±3 | api $0.0040/audio min | |||
| 30 | 61±2 | comparison only | |||
| 31 | 61±2 | api price unknown | |||
| 32 | 61±2 | api $0.0040/audio min +local | |||
| 33 | 61±3 | api $0.0090/audio min | |||
| more from Google | |||||
| 11 | 67±6 | api $0.0050/audio min | |||
| 55 | 58±3 | api price unknown | |||
| 110 | 50±4 | comparison only | |||
see all speech-to-text models · find the ones that fit your machine
$ what it's good at
long-form transcription▁▁▄▁·▁▂█▄▁▁▁ #14 of 27 * · 10% of its score · 1 test
Trails Whisper large (v1), Whisper large-v2, Rev AI Machine (Reverb ASR) here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open ASR English long-form WER | 9.6% ✎ | ▁▁▅▁·▃▅█▆▁▂▂ beats 14/30 | 10% |
multilingual transcription▂··▃▄█▆▅▄▃·▂ #4 of 36 * · 4.4% of its score · 1 test
Beats Cohere Transcribe Arabic (07-2026), Cohere Transcribe (03-2026), Nova-3 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SeamlessM4T v2 Large here, though they rank lower overall.
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| mu-bench voice-agent caller utterances · batch UER (5 locales) | 11.9% ✎ | █·····▄····▄ beats 3/3 | 4.4% |
other tests13 not in a task · 84% of its score
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| AfriSpeech-MultiBench · Parliament (legal domain) WER | 28.2% ✎ | ▂▂····▂·▅·▃█ beats 3/12 | 17% |
| Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026) | 6.6% ✎ | ▁▁▁▃··▁▁▂██▆ beats 67/86 | 10% |
| RW-Voice-EQ ASR · 4 real-world English sets, mean WER | 8.7% ✎ | █▃▃▅▃···▃··▃ beats 6/9 | 8.3% |
| VoiceCodeBench · batch canonical token/entity match (CTEM) | 88.8% ✎ | ▄···▄··▄▄▄·█ beats 3/6 | 8.1% |
| GigaSpeechBench · 7 Arabic dialect WER mean | 38.2% ✎ | █··█·██··█·█ beats 5/5 | 6.1% |
| VoiceCodeBench · batch WER (300 English workplace segments) | 5.8% ✎ | ▄·▄·▄·▄█···▄ beats 5/6 | 5.7% |
| GigaSpeechBench · 12 English domains entity B-WER mean | 14.7% ✎ | ▄·······▄·█▄ beats 2/4 | 5.2% |
| Perle code-switching benchmark · 4-pair mean WER | 39.4% ✎ | █··········▄ beats 0/2 | 4.9% |
5 more tests
| test | result | vs the others in its run | counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOTNOI report · FLEURS Thai CER | 10.3% ✎ | █··█·······█ beats 0/2 | 4.8% |
| GigaSpeechBench · 6 English accents WER mean | 17.2% ✎ | ▄······▄··▄█ beats 2/4 | 4.3% |
| BOTNOI Thai telephony · CER | 13.4% ✎ | █·······█··█ beats 2/2 | 4.0% |
| koedesk FLEURS first-200 · 9-language headline error mean | 4.2% ✎ | ▄·····▄··▄█▄ beats 2/5 | 3.5% |
| Quranic ASR Leaderboard · held-out recitation (600 clips) overall WER | 10.3% ✎ | ▃·▅·▅▃▃·▃▃▃█ beats 11/12 | 1.9% |
$ where to run it
Through an API
api · price unknown · cloud.google.com ↗
$ how the score was worked out · Open ASR Leaderboard 21%, AfriSpeech-MultiBench (arXiv:… 17%, GigaSpeechBench: A Real-World… 16% and 7 more
Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works
$ improve this page
Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.
data updated · sources and licences · json