whatmodel.sh / stt / Voxtral Small 24B (2507)

Voxtral Small 24B (2507) is an open-weights speech-to-text model from Mistral, released July 2025. Its published size is 24.3B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.

60.8±1.5#27 of 162 speech-to-text modelsfrom 18 benchmark results across 7 sources

Score within the Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026) comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The speech-to-text models ranked either side of Voxtral Small 24B (2507), out of 176 with a score, then more from Mistral.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
30Scribe v1 ElevenLabs61±2comparison only2025-02
31Chirp 3 Google61±2api price unknown2025-03
32Voxtral Small 24B (2507) Mistral61±2api $0.0040/audio min +local~59GB2025-07
33Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live Google61±3api $0.0090/audio min2026-08
34Granite Speech 4.1 2B Plus IBM61±4local~2.4GB2026-04
more from Mistral
46Voxtral Mini Transcribe V2 Mistral59±3api $0.0030/audio min2026-02
52Voxtral Mini 3B (2507) Mistral58±1api $0.0010/audio min +local~12GB2025-07
96Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime (2602) Mistral53±2api $0.0060/audio min +local~3.2GB2026-02

see all speech-to-text models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

multilingual transcription▂··▃▄█▆▅▄▂·▂ #5 of 36 * · 32% of its score · 2 tests

Beats Cohere Transcribe Arabic (07-2026), Cohere Transcribe (03-2026), Nova-3 here, though they rank higher overall. Trails SeamlessM4T v2 Large here, though they rank lower overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Open ASR multilingual WER3.7% ✎▂··▂▃▂█▃█▃▁▁ beats 27/29avg 8.9%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 25%typical
CoSE-E enterprise code-switching · 4 European pairs mean WER6.2% ✎█··██···█··█ beats 1/4avg 13%▇▇▇ 7.0%typical
other tests14 not in a task · 67% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LibriSpeech test-clean WER +11.6% ✎▁···▁▁▂·▄▄██ beats 45/56avg 2.3%▇▇▇▇ 11%blunt · several runs
Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026)6.6% ✎▁▁▁▃··▁▁▂██▆ beats 68/86avg 8.2%▇▇▇ 7.5%blunt
SPGISpeech test WER lab1.9% ✎▄▄··▄██··▄██ beats 11/11avg 5.4%▇▇ 6.2%sharp
SwitchBoard WER lab11.1% ✎▄······▄···█ beats 3/3avg 22%▇▇ 5.7%typical
CHiME-4 WER lab9.6% ✎█··█·█·····█ beats 3/3avg 18%▇▇ 5.3%typical
Earnings-21 10-minute long-form WER lab9.6% ✎█···█·····██ beats 3/3avg 16%▇▇ 4.9%typical
FLEURS English test WER +13.5% ✎▁··▁▁▁▁▁▁▃█▃ beats 55/56avg 5.8%▇▇ 4.9%blunt · several runs
Earnings-22 10-minute long-form WER lab12.5% ✎█····█·█···█ beats 1/3avg 21%▇▇ 4.8%typical
6 more tests
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
GigaSpeech test WER lab10.3% ✎▁····▁··▁▄█▂ beats 5/17avg 19%▇▇ 4.7%typical
LibriSpeech test-other WER lab3.1% ✎▁▁▁▂▅▃▅▄█▂▃▁ beats 51/54avg 6.0%▇▇ 4.1%typical
Danish ASR Leaderboard · mean WER over 5 Danish test sets (RyeAI)20.8% ✎▂▂···▃▂▅█▃▂▂ beats 14/16avg 32%▇ 2.9%blunt
VoxPopuli English test WER lab6.6% ✎█▄▄··████▄██ beats 8/16avg 11%▇ 2.4%typical
Open Universal Arabic ASR Leaderboard · 6-test-set average WER34.5% ✎▃·▂▂▅█▅▃▂▅▂▂ beats 15/22avg 40%▇ 2.2%blunt
Speech Accessibility Project dysarthric speech · zero-shot WER (rated subset, N=11,218)13.9% ✎▂·▂··▂····▆█ beats 8/9avg 18%▇ 0.9%blunt

$ where to run it

Through an API

api · Mistral AI · $0.0040/audio min · docs.mistral.ai ↗ · price sourceUSD per input audio minute: Mistral lists Voxtral Small audio input at $0.004 per minute on /v1/chat/completions; transcript output is billed separately as output tokens ($0.4 / M tokens), text input $0.1 / M. Docs list Voxtral Small v25.07 as the current audio model. Product: Mistral API. API model: voxtral-small (25.07). Settings: standard (non-batch). Price basis: published audio-input component. Exclusions: output/text tokens, regional endpoint surcharge. Currency: USD. Mistral official API pricing page, observed 2026-09-25.

Other ways to run it

  1. Run it as published · needs ~58.82 GB, NVIDIA only · from huggingface.co/mistralai
    vllm serve mistralai/Voxtral-Small-24B-2507 --tokenizer_mode mistral --config_format mistral --load_format mistral --tensor-parallel-size 2 --tool-call-parser mistral --enable-auto-tool-choice

Weights and documentation: huggingface.co/mistralai ↗

$ how the score was worked out · Mistral AI — Voxtral technica… 40%, Open ASR Leaderboard 33%, transcribe.cpp model catalog… 13% and 4 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

$ quantization evidence · 1 measurements

How much of the full-precision result a quantized version kept, measured within one study. Rows from the same study share a table and aren't independent.

precisiontestfull → quantizedkept
FP8 W8A8 dynamic (weights symmetric static per-channel, activations symmetric dynamic per-token; llm-compressor FP8_DYNAMIC)FLEURS English transcription WER0.0345 → 0.0343100.6%source ↗

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json