whatmodel.sh / stt / Whisper large (v1)

Whisper large (v1) is an open-weights speech-to-text model from OpenAI, released September 2022. Its published size is 1.55B parameters. Licence: apache-2.0.

Catalogue identity notes

Exact checkpoint openai/whisper-large (openai-whisper name 'large-v1'; the HF repo openai/whisper-large is the original v1 large model, distinct from large-v2 and large-v3). Params from the Whisper README size table. Licence as declared on the HF card.

49.4±2.4#105 of 162 speech-to-text modelsfrom 7 benchmark results across 4 sources

Score within the Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026) comparison set only.

$ how it compares

The speech-to-text models ranked either side of Whisper large (v1), out of 176 with a score, then more from OpenAI.

#modelscorewhereRAMreleased
115Multitalker Parakeet Streaming 0.6B v1 NVIDIA50±4local~0.9GB2025-10
116Omnilingual ASR CTC 1B v2 Meta50±3local~2.9GB2025-12
117Whisper large (v1) OpenAI49±2local~4.2GB2022-09
118OWSM-CTC v3.2 ft 1B ESPnet (CMU WAVLab)49±4local~5.4GB2024-09
119Nemotron Speech Streaming EN 0.6B NVIDIA49±4local~0.7GB2026-03
more from OpenAI
13GPT Transcribe OpenAI64±4api $0.0045/audio min2026-07
48GPT-Realtime-Whisper OpenAI59±3api $0.017/audio min2026-05
61Whisper large-v3-turbo OpenAI57±1api $0.0005/audio min +local~2.4GB2024-10

see all speech-to-text models · find the ones that fit your machine

$ what it's good at

long-form transcription▁▁▄▁·▁▂█▄▁▁▁ #11 of 27 * · 21% of its score · 1 test

Beats Chirp 3, Parakeet TDT 1.1B, Parakeet RNNT 1.1B here, though they rank higher overall.

testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
Open ASR English long-form WER9.4% ✎▁▁▅▁·▃▅█▆▁▂▂ beats 17/30avg 12%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 21%typical
other tests6 not in a task · 77% of its score
testresultvs the others in its rundifficultycountswhy
LibriSpeech test-clean WER2.7% ✎▁···▁▁▂·▄▄██ beats 13/56avg 2.3%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 26%blunt
Open ASR English short-form WER (March 2026)7.9% ✎▁▁▁▃··▁▁▂██▆ beats 37/86avg 8.2%▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 21%blunt
FLEURS English test WER4.5% ✎▁··▁▁▁▁▁▁▃█▁ beats 38/56avg 5.8%▇▇▇▇ 11%blunt
FLEURS Mandarin test error rate19.3% ✎▂▂··▂▄▂▂·▆██ beats 3/17avg 12%▇▇▇▇ 10%typical
Open Universal Arabic ASR Leaderboard · 6-test-set average WER42.6% ✎▃·▂▂▅█▅▃▂▅▂▂ beats 5/22avg 40%▇▇ 6.0%blunt
AfriSpeech-200 test (108 African accents) · WER30.6% ✎███····█████ beats 7/7avg 30%▇ 3.3%blunt

$ where to run it

Other ways to run it

version

  1. Run it as published · needs ~4.22 GB · from github.com/openai (official)
    uvx --from openai-whisper whisper audio.mp3 --model large-v1

Official weights and documentation: huggingface.co/openai ↗

$ how the score was worked out · transcribe.cpp model catalog… 47%, Open ASR Leaderboard 41%, Open Universal Arabic ASR Lea… 6% and 1 more

Each result implies a score on its own, after adjusting for how hard its test is and who ran it. The score is their weighted average, with a small pull toward the middle for thinly tested models. Each test's weight is its counts column above; here it's added up by who ran the tests. How it works

sourceresultsshare of the scorelicence
transcribe.cpp model catalog · LibriSpeech test-clean WER of validated full-precision ports3▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 47%MIT
Open ASR Leaderboard2▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 41%Apache-2.0
Open Universal Arabic ASR Leaderboard (Elm Research Center)1▇▇ 6%Apache-2.0
AfriSpeech-200 (arXiv:2310.00274v1) · zero-shot WER of open ASR models on African-accented English1▇ 3%CC BY 4.0
prior · pull toward the middle▇ 2%
weighted average= 49.4

$ improve this page

Use a short GitHub form or edit the data through a pull request. Every number needs a source; here's which ones we can use.

data updated · sources and licences · json